The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linkage-Specific Avidity Defines the Lysine 63-Linked Polyubiquitin-Binding Preference of Rap80
Open accessAbstract
Summary Linkage-specific polyubiquitin recognition is thought to make possible the diverse set of functional outcomes associated with ubiquitination. Thus far, mechanistic insight into this selectivity has been largely limited to single domains that preferentially bind to lysine 48-linked polyubiquitin (K48-polyUb) in isolation. Here we propose a mechanism, linkage-specific avidity, in which multiple ubiquitin binding domains are arranged in space so that simultaneous, high-affinity interactions are optimum with one polyUb linkage, but unfavorable or impossible with other polyUb topologies and monoUb. Our model is human Rap80, which contains tandem ubiquitin interacting motifs (UIMs) that bind to K63-polyUb at DNA double-strand breaks. We show how the sequence between the Rap80 UIMs positions the domains for efficient, avid binding across a single K63 linkage, thus defining selectivity. We also demonstrate K48-specific avidity in a different protein, ataxin-3. Using tandem UIMs, we establish the general principles governing polyUb linkage selectivity and affinity in multivalent ubiquitin receptors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abraxas and RAP80 Form a BRCA1 Protein Complex Required for the DNA Damage Response
Wang, B., Matsuoka, S., Ballif, B. A., Zhang, D., Smogorzewska, A., Gygi, S. P., & Elledge, S. J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139476 · Cited by 695
Cited by
Komander, D., & Rape, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328 · Cited by 3,679
Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications
Polo, S. E., & Jackson, S. P. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.2021311 · Cited by 1,092
Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work
Ye, Y., & Rape, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2780 · Cited by 989
The emerging complexity of protein ubiquitination
Komander, D. (2009) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0370937 · Cited by 821
Thompson, L. H. (2012) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.06.002 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Sims, J. J., & Cohen, R. E.
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 775-783
- ISSN
- 1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023853131
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linkage-Specific Avidity Defines the Lysine 63-Linked Polyubiquitin-Binding Preference of Rap80. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.011
- The paper
- Sims, J. J., & Cohen, R. E. (2009). Linkage-Specific Avidity Defines the Lysine 63-Linked Polyubiquitin-Binding Preference of Rap80. Molecular Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.