Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: RNAi, TALEN, or CRISPR

Open access
Boettcher, Michael, McManus, Michael T.·2015·Molecular Cell

Abstract

The most widely used approach for defining a genes’ function is to reduce or completely disrupt its normal expression. For over a decade, RNAi has ruled the lab, offering a magic bullet to disrupt gene expression in many organisms. However, new biotechnological tools - specifically CRISPR-based technologies - have become available and are squeezing out RNAi dominance in mammalian cell studies. These seemingly competing technologies leave research investigators with the question: ‘Which technology should I use in my experiment?’ This review offers a practical resource to compare and contrast these technologies, guiding the investigator when and where to use this fantastic array of powerful tools.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.028

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 516

Metadata

Authors
Boettcher, M., & McManus, M. T.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
575-585
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1486227004
Cited by
516
References
28
FWCI
17.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: RNAi, TALEN, or CRISPR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.028
The paper
Boettcher, M., & McManus, M. T. (2015). Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: RNAi, TALEN, or CRISPR. Molecular Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.