Cited by 16Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationProtein Structure and Dynamics

A disordered linker in the Polycomb protein Polyhomeotic tunes phase separation and oligomerization

Open access
Gemeinhardt, Tim M., Regy, Roshan M., Phan, Tien M., Pal, Nanu, Sharma, Jyoti, Senkovich, Olga, Mendiola, Andrea J., Ledterman, Heather J. +11 more·2025·Molecular Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Biomolecular condensates are increasingly recognized as key regulators of chromatin organization, yet how their formation and properties arise from protein sequences remains incompletely understood. Cross-species comparisons can reveal both conserved functions and significant evolutionary differences. Here, we integrate in vitro reconstitution, molecular dynamics simulations, and cell-based assays to examine how Drosophila and human variants of Polyhomeotic (Ph)-a subunit of the PRC1 chromatin regulatory complex-drive condensate formation through their sterile alpha motif (SAM) oligomerization domains. We identify divergent interactions between SAM and the disordered linker connecting it to the rest of Ph. These interactions enhance oligomerization and modulate both the formation and properties of reconstituted condensates. Oligomerization influences condensate dynamics but minimally impacts condensate formation. Linker-SAM interactions also affect condensate formation in Drosophila and human cells and growth in Drosophila imaginal discs. Our findings show how evolutionary changes in disordered linkers can fine-tune condensate properties, providing insights into sequence-function relationships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.05.008

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gemeinhardt, T. M., Regy, R. M., Phan, T. M., Pal, N., Sharma, J., Senkovich, O., Mendiola, A. J., Ledterman, H. J., Henrickson, A., Lopes, D., Kapoor, U., Bihani, A., Sihou, D., Kim, Y. C., Jeruzalmi, D., Demeler, B., Kim, C. A., Mittal, J., & Francis, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Montreal Clinical Research Institute (CA)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Midwestern University (US)
  • University of Lethbridge (CA)
  • City College of New York (US)
  • University of Wyoming (US)
  • United States Naval Research Laboratory (US)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
Corresponding author
  • Mittal, Jeetain
  • Francis, Nicole J.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-06
Volume
85
Issue
11
Pages
2128-2146.e15
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410816879
Cited by
16
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM114338)
  • Université de Montréal (SCR_022303)
  • Welch Foundation (A-2113-20220331)
  • Canada Research Chairs Program (C150-2017-00015)
  • Quebec Health Research Fund
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • U.S. Naval Research Laboratory
  • High Performance Research Computing, Texas A and M University
  • Office of Naval Research
  • Institute of Genetics (469023)
  • National Institutes of Health (1R01GM120600, R15CA26780, R35GM153388)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (DG-RGPIN-2019-05040, DG-RGPIN-2019-05637)
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI-37589, 30574)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
polyhomeotic, Polycomb group proteins, biomolecular condensates, phase separation, sterile alpha motif, protein oligomerization, sequence-function relationships, evolutionary divergence, Drosophila, chromatin organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review