The alternative pathway is required, but not alone sufficient, for retinal pathology in mouse laser-induced choroidal neovascularization
Open accessAbstract
Human genetic studies have demonstrated that polymorphisms in different complement proteins can increase the risk for developing AMD. There are three pathways of complement activation, classical (CP), alternative (AP), and lectin (LP), which all activate a final common pathway. Proteins encoded by the AMD risk genes participate in the AP (CFB), CP/LP (C2), or in the AP and final common pathway (C3). Here we tested which pathway is essential in mouse laser-induced CNV. CNV was analyzed using single complement pathway knockouts (i.e., eliminating one complement pathway at a time), followed by a double knockout in which only the AP is present, and the CP and LP are disabled, using molecular, histological and electrophysiological outcomes. First, single-gene knockouts were analyzed and compared to wild type mice; C1q(-/-) (no CP), MBL(-/-) (no LP), and CFB(-/-) (no AP). Six days after the laser-induced lesion, mice without a functional AP had reduced CNV progression (P<0.001) and preserved ERG amplitudes, whereas those without a functional CP or LP were indistinguishable from the wild type controls (P>0.3). Second, AP-only mice (C1q(-/-)MBL(-/-)) were as protected from developing CNV as the CFB(-/-) mice. The degree of pathology in each strain correlated with protein levels of the angiogenic and anti-angiogenic protein VEGF and PEDF, respectively, as well as levels of terminal pathway activation product C5a, and C9. The analysis of complement activation pathways in mouse laser-induced CNV allows for the following conclusions. Comparing the single pathway knockouts with those having only a functional AP showed: (1) that AP activation is necessary, but not alone sufficient for injury; and (2) that initial complement activation proceeds via both the LP and CP. Thus, these data indicate an important role for the AP in the generation of complement-dependent injury in the RPE and choroid via amplification of CP- and LP-initiated complement activation. Improving our understanding of the local regulation of this pathway in the eye is essential for developing improved treatment approaches for AMD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies have shown that FB has a pro-angiogenic effect mediated through increased VEGF and VEGFR2 expression by endothelial cells in mouse models of laser-induced CNV and retinal hypoxia.
“Some studies have shown that FB has a pro-angiogenic effect mediated through increased VEGF and VEGFR2 expression by endothelial cells in mouse models of laser-induced CNV and retinal hypoxia [81,153,171].”
From Bruch’s Membrane: A Key Consideration with Complement-Based Therapies for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
Several experiments using mouse models of laser-induced CNV have demonstrated that all complement pathways, particularly the alternative and terminal pathways, play a significant role in angiogenesis.
“Several experiments using mouse models of laser-induced CNV have demonstrated that all complement pathways, particularly the alternative and terminal pathways, play a significant role in angiogenesis [150,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163].”
From Bruch’s Membrane: A Key Consideration with Complement-Based Therapies for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Rohrer, B., Coughlin, B., Kunchithapautham, K., Long, Q., Tomlinson, S., Takahashi, K., & Holers, V. M.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rohrer, Bärbel
- Venue
- Molecular Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6-7
- Pages
- e1-e8
- ISSN
- 0161-5890 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3063365
- OpenAlex
- W2060934800
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Molecular Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 RX000444)
- National Institutes of Health (1c06rr015455-01a1)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL86576, R01HL086576)
- National Eye Institute (R01EY019320, EY019320)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI077081, U01AI074503, AI074503, R21AI077081)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR53749)
- National Center for Research Resources (C06 RR-015455)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Complement system in diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Keywords
- alternative complement pathway, choroidal neovascularization, laser-induced CNV, age-related macular degeneration, C1q, MBL, CFB, complement C3, C5a, C9, retinal pigment epithelium, choroid, vascular endothelial growth factor, pigment epithelium-derived factor, mouse model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Complement System Proteins, Complement Pathway, Alternative, Electroretinography, Gene Expression Regulation, Lasers, Retina, RNA, Messenger, Choroidal Neovascularization, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Angiogenesis Inducing Agents, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review