Cited by 108Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic function and diabetesChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peptide lipidation stabilizes structure to enhance biological function

Open access
Ward, Brian P., Ottaway, Nickki L., Perez-Tilve, Diego, Ma, Dejian, Gelfanov, Vasily M., Tschöp, Matthias H., DiMarchi, Richard D.·2013·Molecular Metabolism

Abstract

Medicines that decrease body weight and restore nutrient tolerance could improve human diabetes and obesity treatment outcomes. We developed lipid-acylated glucagon analogs that are co-agonists for the glucagon and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptors, and stimulate weight loss and plasma glucose lowering in pre-diabetic obese mice. Our studies identified lipid acylation (lipidation) can increase and balance in vitro potencies of select glucagon analogs for the two aforementioned receptors in a lipidation site-dependent manner. A general capacity for lipidation to enhance the secondary structure of glucagon analogs was recognized, and the energetics of this effect quantified. The molecular structure of a lipid-acylated glucagon analog in water was also characterized. These results support that lipidation can modify biological activity through thermodynamically-favorable intramolecular interactions which stabilize structure. This establishes use of lipidation to achieve specific pharmacology and implicates similar endogenous post-translational modifications as physiological tools capable of refining biological action in means previously underappreciated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molmet.2013.08.008

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Figure 1 In vitro characterization of lipidated Aib2,16a analogs. (A) GCGR activation by lipidated Aib2,16a analogs in engineered HEK293 cells ( N ¼ 2, SD shown). Data are fit to a doseresponse function to provide the EC50 values. N , number of independent data points. SD, standard deviation. (B) The GLP-1R response measured using the same assay format and lipidated peptides as panel (A).
Figure 1 In vitro characterization of lipidated Aib2,16a analogs. (A) GCGR activation by lipidated Aib2,16a analogs in engineered HEK293 cells ( N ¼ 2, SD shown). Data are fit to a doseresponse function to provide the EC50 values. N , number of independent data points. SD, standard deviation. (B) The GLP-1R response measured using the same assay format and lipidated peptides as panel (A).CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Figure 3 CD spectra and thermal denaturation of lipidated Aib2,16a analogs. (A) CD spectra ( N ¼ 3) of lipidated Aib2,16a analogs (10 m M) in water (pH 7.4) at 298 K. [], mean residue ellipticity. (B) CD spectra of Lys13-Glu-Glu-C16 ( 12 ) (10 m M) compared to Aib2,16a ( 2 ) (10 m M) in water (pH 7.4) or 90% TFE/10% 0.01 N NaOH (pH 11) at 298 K. (C) Reversible thermal denaturation of Aib2,16a and lipidated Aib2,16a analogs in water (pH 7.4) ( N ¼ 2 from consecutive experiments using the same sample, SD shown). Data are fit to a two-state folding equilibrium model where for the lipidated peptides the fit was performed as two individual transitions separated at 323 K (denoted by an * on the temperature axis) in each instance [13]. Thermodynamic parameters (Table S3) were obtained from the fit and used to calculate the helical free energy at 310 K ( G (310 K)), which was determined to be  2.8 kcal/mol, 1.9 kcal/mol, 2.5 kcal/mol, 3.5 kcal/mol and 3.8 kcal/mol for peptides 2 , 20 , 21 , 12 and 8 , respectively. These values were used to calculate G Helix relative to 2 in Table 1B. (D) A second view of the data in panel (C) showing only peptides 20 and 21 .
Figure 3 CD spectra and thermal denaturation of lipidated Aib2,16a analogs. (A) CD spectra ( N ¼ 3) of lipidated Aib2,16a analogs (10 m M) in water (pH 7.4) at 298 K. [], mean residue ellipticity. (B) CD spectra of Lys13-Glu-Glu-C16 ( 12 ) (10 m M) compared to Aib2,16a ( 2 ) (10 m M) in water (pH 7.4) or 90% TFE/10% 0.01 N NaOH (pH 11) at 298 K. (C) Reversible thermal denaturation of Aib2,16a and lipidated Aib2,16a analogs in water (pH 7.4) ( N ¼ 2 from consecutive experiments using the same sample, SD shown). Data are fit to a two-state folding equilibrium model where for the lipidated peptides the fit was performed as two individual transitions separated at 323 K (denoted by an * on the temperature axis) in each instance [13]. Thermodynamic parameters (Table S3) were obtained from the fit and used to calculate the helical free energy at 310 K ( G (310 K)), which was determined to be 2.8 kcal/mol, 1.9 kcal/mol, 2.5 kcal/mol, 3.5 kcal/mol and 3.8 kcal/mol for peptides 2 , 20 , 21 , 12 and 8 , respectively. These values were used to calculate G Helix relative to 2 in Table 1B. (D) A second view of the data in panel (C) showing only peptides 20 and 21 .CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Figure 4 1 H NMR-based structural model of Aib2,16a Lys13-Glu-Glu-C16 ( 12 ) in water. (A) Bar graph displaying the number of interresidue NOE connectivities per amino acid residue identified through the water NMR experiments. (B) One of the 10 lowest energy conformers from a 100 structure calculation in xplor-NIH [17] using the NOESY chemical shift resonance assignments as structural distance restraints is shown with the NOE interactions between C16 (H C4 and H C16 , respectively) and residues Gln3 (H N ) or Phe6 (H and H) indicated by dotted lines. *, N-terminus. (C) Structure calculation parameters. Twelve additional hydrogen bond restraints were used for the calculation corresponding to the six helical NOEs assigned (Figure S3A) [17,18]. (D) Overlay of the 10 lowest energy conformers from the calculation. A single conformer is shown in cartoon form and the other nine as ribbons.
Figure 4 1 H NMR-based structural model of Aib2,16a Lys13-Glu-Glu-C16 ( 12 ) in water. (A) Bar graph displaying the number of interresidue NOE connectivities per amino acid residue identified through the water NMR experiments. (B) One of the 10 lowest energy conformers from a 100 structure calculation in xplor-NIH [17] using the NOESY chemical shift resonance assignments as structural distance restraints is shown with the NOE interactions between C16 (H C4 and H C16 , respectively) and residues Gln3 (H N ) or Phe6 (H and H) indicated by dotted lines. *, N-terminus. (C) Structure calculation parameters. Twelve additional hydrogen bond restraints were used for the calculation corresponding to the six helical NOEs assigned (Figure S3A) [17,18]. (D) Overlay of the 10 lowest energy conformers from the calculation. A single conformer is shown in cartoon form and the other nine as ribbons.CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Figure 5 1 H NMR-based structural model of Aib2,16a Lys13-Glu-Glu-C16 ( 12 ) in d -TFE. (A) Bar graph displaying the number of interresidue NOE connectivities per amino acid residue identified through the d -TFE NMR experiments. (B) One of the 10 lowest energy conformers from a 100 structure calculation in xplor-NIH [17] using the NOESY chemical shift resonance assignments as structural distance restraints is shown with the NOE interactions between C16 and residues Leu14 (H C14 -H), Arg17 (H C15 -H) or Arg18 (H C15 -H) indicated by dotted lines. *N-terminus. (C) Structure calculation parameters. (D) Overlay of the 10 lowest energy conformers from the calculation. A single conformer is shown in cartoon form and the other nine as ribbons.
Figure 5 1 H NMR-based structural model of Aib2,16a Lys13-Glu-Glu-C16 ( 12 ) in d -TFE. (A) Bar graph displaying the number of interresidue NOE connectivities per amino acid residue identified through the d -TFE NMR experiments. (B) One of the 10 lowest energy conformers from a 100 structure calculation in xplor-NIH [17] using the NOESY chemical shift resonance assignments as structural distance restraints is shown with the NOE interactions between C16 and residues Leu14 (H C14 -H), Arg17 (H C15 -H) or Arg18 (H C15 -H) indicated by dotted lines. *N-terminus. (C) Structure calculation parameters. (D) Overlay of the 10 lowest energy conformers from the calculation. A single conformer is shown in cartoon form and the other nine as ribbons.CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF
Table 1: Summary of lipidated glucagon-based peptides. (A) Important peptide sequences for this study. The differences of Aib2,16a and GLP-1 with the glucagon sequence are underlined. The N- and C-terminal hydrophobic helical faces in all three peptides consist of residues 6, 10 and 13, and residues 22, 23, 25 and 26, respectively [23]. X, aminoisobutyric acid (Aib). (B) Master table for peptides used in this study. EC50 values were obtained from experiments in Figure 1A and B for peptides 1 , 2 , 3 , 8 , 15 , 20 and 21 . For peptides 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 and 19 , the EC50 values were obtained from Figures S5 and S6, and normalized against standards from Figure 1A and B. As reference, liraglutide ( 9 ) has in vitro potency equal to GLP-1 ( 3 ) at the GLP-1R [2]. G GLP-1R was calculated using Gibbs equation [14]. G Helix was calculated using thermodynamic parameters (Table S3) obtained from the thermal denaturation experiments in Figure 3C. The aqueous and 90% TFE helical content relative to 2 was determined by dividing the 222 nm CD signal for each indicated peptide by the equivalent signal for Aib2,16a ( 2 ) (Figures 4A and S7A-C). PBS solubility was measured by ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy. Self-aggregation tendency was determined by dynamic light scattering experiments in 0.01 N sodium hydroxide (Figure S7D). Peptides were classified as strong if they aggregated immediately after sample preparation, moderate if aggregated after a single 24-h freeze cycle, weak if aggregated after 1 month of freezing or no apparent if they had no detected aggregation throughout these trials. No. peptide number. [], mean residue ellipticity. Calc. pI, calculated isoelectric point. (C) Chemical structure of a Lys-Glu-Glu-C16 side chain at neutral pH.
Table 1: Summary of lipidated glucagon-based peptides. (A) Important peptide sequences for this study. The differences of Aib2,16a and GLP-1 with the glucagon sequence are underlined. The N- and C-terminal hydrophobic helical faces in all three peptides consist of residues 6, 10 and 13, and residues 22, 23, 25 and 26, respectively [23]. X, aminoisobutyric acid (Aib). (B) Master table for peptides used in this study. EC50 values were obtained from experiments in Figure 1A and B for peptides 1 , 2 , 3 , 8 , 15 , 20 and 21 . For peptides 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 and 19 , the EC50 values were obtained from Figures S5 and S6, and normalized against standards from Figure 1A and B. As reference, liraglutide ( 9 ) has in vitro potency equal to GLP-1 ( 3 ) at the GLP-1R [2]. G GLP-1R was calculated using Gibbs equation [14]. G Helix was calculated using thermodynamic parameters (Table S3) obtained from the thermal denaturation experiments in Figure 3C. The aqueous and 90% TFE helical content relative to 2 was determined by dividing the 222 nm CD signal for each indicated peptide by the equivalent signal for Aib2,16a ( 2 ) (Figures 4A and S7A-C). PBS solubility was measured by ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy. Self-aggregation tendency was determined by dynamic light scattering experiments in 0.01 N sodium hydroxide (Figure S7D). Peptides were classified as strong if they aggregated immediately after sample preparation, moderate if aggregated after a single 24-h freeze cycle, weak if aggregated after 1 month of freezing or no apparent if they had no detected aggregation throughout these trials. No. peptide number. [], mean residue ellipticity. Calc. pI, calculated isoelectric point. (C) Chemical structure of a Lys-Glu-Glu-C16 side chain at neutral pH.CC-BY-NC-SA · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ward, B. P., Ottaway, N. L., Perez-Tilve, D., Ma, D., Gelfanov, V. M., Tschöp, M. H., & DiMarchi, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Ward, Brian P.
Venue
Molecular Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
468-479
ISSN
2212-8778 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047944726
Cited by
101
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
glucagon receptor, GLP-1 receptor, weight loss, blood glucose reduction, obesity, diabetes mellitus, prediabetes, intramolecular interactions, post-translational modification, structure-activity relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review