The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activation of a pro‐survival pathway IL‐6/JAK2/STAT3 contributes to glial fibrillary acidic protein induction during the cholera toxin‐induced differentiation of C6 malignant glioma cells
Abstract
Differentiation‐inducing therapy has been proposed to be a novel potential approach to treat malignant gliomas. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a well‐known specific astrocyte biomarker and acts as a tumor suppressor gene (TSG) in glioma pathogenesis. Previously we reported that a traditional biotoxin cholera toxin could induce malignant glioma cell differentiation characterized by morphologic changes and dramatic GFAP expression. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying GFAP induction are still largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that an oncogenic pathway interleukin‐6/janus kinase‐2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (IL‐6/JAK2/STAT3) cascade mediates the cholera toxin‐induced GFAP expression. Cholera toxin dramatically stimulated GFAP expression at the transcriptional level in C6 glioma cells. Meanwhile, phosphorylation of STAT3 and JAK2 was highly induced in a time‐dependent manner after cholera toxin incubation, whereas no changes of STAT3 and JAK2 were observed. Furthermore, the IL‐6 gene was quickly induced by cholera toxin and subsequent IL‐6 protein secretion was stimulated. Importantly, exogenous recombinant rat IL‐6 can also induce phosphorylation of STAT3 concomitant with GFAP expression while JAK2 specific inhibitor AG490 could effectively block both cholera toxin‐ and IL‐6‐induced GFAP expression. Given that the methylation of the STAT3 binding element can suppress GFAP expression, we detected the methylation status of the critical recognition sequence of STAT3 in the promoter of GFAP gene (−1518 ∼ −1510) and found that it was unmethylated in C6 glioma cells. In addition, neither DNA methyltransferase1 (DNMT1) inhibitor 5‐Aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine (5‐AZa‐CdR) nor silencing DNMT1 can stimulate GFAP expression, indicating that the loss of GFAP expression in C6 cells is not caused by its promoter hypermethylation. Taken together, our findings suggest that activation of a pro‐survival IL‐6/JAK2/STAT3 cascade contributes to cholera toxin‐induced GFAP expression, which implies that a survival‐promoting signal may also play a differentiation‐supporting role in malignant gliomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This pattern is consistent with previous reports showing that deleterious stimuli induce GFAP expression in C6 cells (Shu et al. 2011; Chao et al. 2015), supporting the interpretation that LDL triggers a classical astrocytic stress response.”
From LDL Cholesterol Modulates Astrocyte Metabolism, Lipid Handling, and Morphology: Evidence From In Vitro and In Vivo Models (2026) · cites this paper as Shu et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowman, T., Garcia, R., Turkson, J., & Jove, R. (2000) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203527 · Cited by 1,743
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1002/ijc.22006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.22.20.7015-7023.2002 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05236 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90122-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81532-9 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.278.5337.477 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81959-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Costello J.F., 1996, Silencing of p16/CDKN2 expression in human gliomas by methylation and chromatin condensation, Cancer Research, 56, 2405
- 10.1136/jmg.38.5.285 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/85.9.704 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0014-4827(82)90328-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/onc.2009.122 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02258360 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1984.tb09714.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1203551 · DOI
- 10.1002/mc.10165 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood.V72.2.567.567 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.053 · DOI
- 10.3171/2008.12.JNS081284 · DOI
- Kupferman M.E., 2009, Therapeutic suppression of constitutive and inducible JAK\STAT activation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Journal of Experimental Therapeutics & Oncology, 8, 117
- 10.1016/S0163-7258(01)00132-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1427 · DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.25020 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0701990104 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.98.1.22 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00435-5 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.284.5413.479 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.014 · DOI
- 10.1006/cyto.2001.0883 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81656-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-10-03620.1998 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/17.17.4905 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1204341 · DOI
- 10.1093/carcin/21.3.461 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00077.x · DOI
- Rutka J.T., 1994, Effects of antisense glial fibrillary acidic protein complementary DNA on the growth, invasion, and adhesion of human astrocytoma cells, Cancer Research, 54, 3267
- Rutka J.T., 1993, Transfection of human astrocytoma cells with glial fibrillary acidic protein complementary DNA: analysis of expression, proliferation, and tumorigenicity, Cancer Research, 53, 3624
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66020466.x · DOI
- Strelkov I.S., 2002, Ser-10 phosphorylation of histone H3 and immediate early gene expression in oncogene-transformed mouse fibroblasts, Cancer Research, 62, 75
- 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02681.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00101-0 · DOI
- 10.1006/cyto.2000.0831 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0741498.x · DOI
- 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0947 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baumart, G. J., Rodrigues, M. S., Sholl, J. N., de Sousa, A. C., Weber, A. F., Costa‐Beber, L. C., Farias, H. R., Costa, M. V., Peres, A. M., de Camargo, P. R., et al. (2026) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.70403 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Shu, M., Zhou, Y., Zhu, W., Wu, S., Zheng, X., & Yan, G.
- Venue
- Molecular Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-21
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-272
- ISSN
- 1574-7891
- 1878-0261
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation (30830111, 30801408, 8451008901000297)
- Chinese Postdoctoral Science (20100480824)
- Guangzhou Scientific and Technological Programs (2008Z1-E561)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review