Cited by 39Ethics in Clinical ResearchBiomedical Ethics and RegulationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Use of human specimens in research: the evolving United States regulatory, policy, and scientific landscape

Open access
Bledsoe, Marianna J., Grizzle, William E.·2013·Diagnostic Histopathology

Abstract

The use of human specimens in research has contributed to significant scientific and medical advancements. However, the development of sophisticated whole genome and informatics technologies and the increase in specimen and data sharing have raised new questions about the identifiability of specimens and the protection of participants in human specimen research. In the US, new regulations and policies are being considered to address these changes. This review discusses the current and proposed regulations as they apply to specimen research, as well as relevant policy discussions. It summarizes the ways that researchers and other stakeholders can provide their input to these discussions and policy development efforts. Input from all the stakeholders in specimen research will be essential for the development of policies that facilitate such research while at the same time protecting the rights and welfare of research participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mpdhp.2013.06.015

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human biospecimens have played a crucial role in scientific and medical advances, and their continued widespread availability for research is vital to realizing the goals of precision medicine.

    “Human biospecimens have played a crucial role in scientific and medical advances.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

25 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [46]Greenberg v Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute 264 F Supp 2d 1064 (SD Fla 2003) 15776537

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bledsoe, M. J., & Grizzle, W. E.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
Diagnostic Histopathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
322-330
ISSN
  • 1876-7621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-2317
OpenAlex
W2064667208
Cited by
39
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diagnostic histopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund
  • National Cancer Institute (P20CA101955, P50CA101955, U01CA044968, P50CA089019, U54CA118623, P30CA013148, U54CA118948)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30AR050948)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (G12MD007585)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
human specimens, research regulation, science policy, research participant protection, identifiability, whole genome sequencing, research ethics, stakeholder feedback, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review