Cited by 11Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Gradient induced artifacts in simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Effect of synchronization on spiral and EPI k-space trajectories

Open access
Solana, A.B., Hernández-Tamames, J.A., Manzanedo, E., García-Álvarez, R., Zelaya, F.O., del Pozo, F.·2014·Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

The nature of the gradient induced electroencephalography (EEG) artifact is analyzed and compared for two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) pulse sequences with different k-space trajectories: echo planar imaging (EPI) and spiral. Furthermore, the performance of the average artifact subtraction algorithm (AAS) to remove the gradient artifact for both sequences is evaluated. The results show that the EEG gradient artifact for spiral sequences is one order of magnitude higher than for EPI sequences due to the chirping spectrum of the spiral sequence and the dB/dt of its crusher gradients. However, in the presence of accurate synchronization, the use of AAS yields the same artifact suppression efficiency for both pulse sequences below 80Hz. The quality of EEG signal after AAS is demonstrated for phantom and human data. EEG spectrogram and visual evoked potential (VEP) are compared outside the scanner and use both EPI and spiral pulse sequences. MR related artifact residues affect the spectra over 40Hz (less than 0.2 μV up to 120Hz) and modify the amplitude of P1, N2 and P300 in the VEP. These modifications in the EEG signal have to be taken into account when interpreting EEG data acquired in simultaneous EEG-fMRI experiments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mri.2014.03.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solana, A. B., Hernández-Tamames, J. A., Manzanedo, E., García-Álvarez, R., Zelaya, F. O., & del Pozo, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Solana, A.B.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
684-692
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029210440
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UPM Digital Archive (Technical University of Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
simultaneous EEG-fMRI, spiral k-space trajectories, echo planar imaging, k-space trajectory, synchronization, visual evoked potentials, P300, artifact removal
MeSH terms
Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Artifacts, Echo-Planar Imaging, Phantoms, Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review