The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: A systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that epigenetic alterations play an important role in chemically-induced carcinogenesis. Although the epigenome and genome may be equally important in carcinogenicity, the genotoxicity of chemical agents and exposure-related transcriptomic responses have been more thoroughly studied and characterized. To better understand the evidence for epigenetic alterations of human carcinogens, and the potential association with genotoxic endpoints, we conducted a systematic review of published studies of genotoxic carcinogens that reported epigenetic endpoints. Specifically, we searched for publications reporting epigenetic effects for the 28 agents and occupations included in Monograph Volume 100F of the International Agency for the Research on Cancer (IARC) that were classified as “carcinogenic to humans” (Group 1) with strong evidence of genotoxic mechanisms of carcinogenesis. We identified a total of 158 studies that evaluated epigenetic alterations for 12 of these 28 carcinogenic agents and occupations (1,3-butadiene, 4-aminobiphenyl, aflatoxins, benzene, benzidine, benzo[a]pyrene, coke production, formaldehyde, occupational exposure as a painter, sulfur mustard, and vinyl chloride). Aberrant DNA methylation was most commonly studied, followed by altered expression of non-coding RNAs and histone changes (totaling 85, 59 and 25 studies, respectively). For 3 carcinogens (aflatoxins, benzene and benzo[a]pyrene), 10 or more studies reported epigenetic effects. However, epigenetic studies were sparse for the remaining 9 carcinogens; for 4 agents, only 1 or 2 published reports were identified. While further research is needed to better identify carcinogenesis-associated epigenetic perturbations for many potential carcinogens, published reports on specific epigenetic endpoints can be systematically identified and increasingly incorporated in cancer hazard assessments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications
Bannister, A. J., & Kouzarides, T. (2011) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2011.22 · Cited by 6,012
Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases
Rea, S., Eisenhaber, F., O'Carroll, D., Strahl, B. D., Sun, Z.-W., Schmid, M., Opravil, S., Mechtler, K., Ponting, C. P., Allis, C. D., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35020506 · Cited by 2,845 · cited 1×
“Loss of these histone modifications is known to impair the maintenance of proper chromatin structure, diminish cellular maintenance and regulation of the cell cycle, disrupt the balance between cell proliferation and differentiation, and severely reduce cell viability [163, 164].”
Function and information content of DNA methylation
Schübeler, D. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14192 · Cited by 2,060
Induction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation
Gaudet, F., Hodgson, J. G., Eden, A., Jackson-Grusby, L., Dausman, J., Gray, J. W., Leonhardt, H., & Jaenisch, R. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083558 · Cited by 1,499 · cited 1×
“For example, several studies have demonstrated a mechanistic link between DNA hypomethylation (the most highly reported, and thus assumed best-characterized, epigenetic alteration among the studies included in this review) and genetic changes, and established the role of this epigenetic alteration in carcinogenesis [2…”
Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions
Shlyueva, D., Stampfel, G., & Stark, A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3682 · Cited by 1,356
IARC Monographs: 40 years of evaluating carcinogenic hazards to humans
Pearce, N., Blair, A., Vineis, P., Ahrens, W., Andersen, A., Anto, J. M., Armstrong, B. K., Baccarelli, A. A., Beland, F. A., Berrington, A., et al. (2015) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1409149 · Cited by 146
Self-citation
Cited by
Kus-Liśkiewicz, M., Fickers, P., & Ben Tahar, I. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222010952 · Cited by 404
Stading, R., Gastelum, G., Chu, C., Jiang, W., & Moorthy, B. (2021) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.07.001 · Cited by 253
Woodward, N. C., Haghani, A., Johnson, R. G., Hsu, T. M., Saffari, A., Sioutas, C., Kanoski, S. E., Finch, C. E., & Morgan, T. E. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0317-1 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Chappell, G., Pogribny, I. P., Guyton, K. Z., & Rusyn, I.
- Venue
- Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 768
- Pages
- 27-45
- ISSN
- 1383-5742 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2326278212
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: A systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.03.004
- The paper
- Chappell, G., Pogribny, I. P., Guyton, K. Z., & Rusyn, I. (2016). Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: A systematic literature review. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.03.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.