Cited by 28Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis

Foxp3+ regulatory T cells expression in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Brill, Livnat, Lavon, Iris, Vaknin-Dembinsky, Adi·2019·Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

Abstract

Background Alterations in the frequency or function of regulatory T cells (Tregs), which play a critical role in the maintenance of peripheral immune tolerance, are known to be involved in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are autoimmune inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), of which the etiology and mechanisms underlying its development are not completely understood. Although there is increasing evidence for the involvement of effector T cells in NMOSD, no data are available regarding the role of Tregs in its pathogenesis. Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the mRNA expression level of regulatory T cell genes in NMOSD. Methods We used gene expression array and RT-PCR analysis to study Treg cell genes in NMOSD RESULTS: A distinctive Treg gene signature in the peripheral blood of NMOSD patients is described, as well as significantly decreased FoxP3 mRNA expression in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of the patients vs that in the healthy controls (HCs) (NMOSD,1.8RQ vs HC, 6.8RQ, p = 0.01). Conclusions The present study shows downregulation at the mRNA expression level of a Treg key transcription factor FoxP3, in NMOSD. Exploration of Tregs function and interconnections in the peripheral immune system should advance our understanding of NMOSD pathogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msard.2019.01.047

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brill, L., Lavon, I., & Vaknin-Dembinsky, A.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
30
Pages
114-118
ISSN
2211-0348 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913061624
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2019-05-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Keywords
neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, regulatory T cells, Foxp3, Foxp3 mRNA expression, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, autoimmune disease pathogenesis, immune tolerance, central nervous system autoimmunity
MeSH terms
Adult, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuromyelitis Optica, RNA, Messenger, Cohort Studies, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review