Cited by 40Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCognitive Functions and MemoryDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Do Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients benefit from computer- based cognitive neurorehabilitation? A randomized sham controlled trial

Messinis, Lambros, Kosmidis, Mary H, Nasios, Grigorios, Konitsiotis, Spyridon, Ntoskou, Aikaterini, Bakirtzis, Christos, Grigoriadis, Nikolaos, Patrikelis, Panayiotis +4 more·2020·Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

Abstract

Background Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), but deficits tend to be more pronounced in progressive MS, negatively impacting daily functional capacity. Despite this, most cognitive rehabilitation (CR) interventions to date have focused on relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Moreover, information on the efficacy of CR in progressive MS is limited and controversial. The present study investigated the efficacy of a home based, computer assisted cognitive rehabilitation (HBCACR) intervention (RehaCom TM software) exclusively in a Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) sample.Methods This was a randomized, multi site, sham controlled trial. Thirty six (36) individuals with SPMS, naïve to the RehaCom software, with cognitive deficits were randomized to the treatment (IG; n= 19) or control group condition (CG; n=17). Treatment with the RehaCom modules consisted of 24 domain and task specific, 45 minute session's over an 8-week period, three sessions per week, applied by each patient at home. The CG completed non specific computer based activities at home with the same frequency and duration. Primary cognitive outcome measures included the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) battery, and secondary outcome measures for depression (BDI-FS), fatigue (MFIS), and quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D) visual analogue scale (VAS).Results The two groups were well matched on demographic and clinical characteristics, cognitive reserve and severity of cognitive deficits at baseline assessment. At post treatment assessment the IG group showed significant improvements with large effect sizes; in verbal learning [z = -4.759, p <.0005, g = 2.898], visuospatial memory [z = -3.940, p <.0005, g = 1.699] and information processing speed [z= -4.792, p <.0005, g = 2.980], compared with the sham control group. We also found significant between group differences on physical [z=-3.308, p = .001, g= -.604], cognitive [z = -4.011, p <.0005, g = -1.654], psychosocial [z= 3.308, p = .010, g = -.940], and general fatigue impact [z= -2.623, p = .008, g = -.519], depression severity [z = -2.730, p = .006, g = -.519], and quality of life [z= -4.239, p <.0005, g = -1.885] in favor of the treated group.Conclusion These data provide the first evidence supporting the efficacy of computer based restorative cognitive rehabilitation applied at home exclusively in SPMS patients, suggesting that adaptive neuroplasticity may occur after functional cognitive training in progressive MS. Improved cognitive functioning in combination with mood augmentation appear to have ameliorated fatigue, which impacted daily functioning activity and culminated in improved health related quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msard.2020.101932

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Messinis, L., Kosmidis, M. H., Nasios, G., Konitsiotis, S., Ntoskou, A., Bakirtzis, C., Grigoriadis, N., Patrikelis, P., Panagiotopoulos, E., Gourzis, P., Malefaki, S., & Papathanasopoulos, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Patras (GR)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • University of Ioannina (GR)
  • AHEPA University Hospital (GR)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Messinis, Lambros
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
39
Pages
101932
ISSN
2211-0348 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999572799
Cited by
40
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, cognitive impairment, computer-based cognitive rehabilitation, home-based intervention, verbal learning, visuospatial memory, processing speed, fatigue, depression, quality of life, BICAMS, cognitive reserve, medication adherence, relapse rate, disease-modifying therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review