The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/polylactic acid (TPU/PLA) tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by microcellular injection molding
Open accessAbstract
Polylactic acid (PLA) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) are two kinds of biocompatible and biodegradable polymers that can be used in biomedical applications. PLA has rigid mechanical properties while TPU possesses flexible mechanical properties. Blended TPU/PLA tissue engineering scaffolds at different ratios for tunable properties were fabricated via twin screw extrusion and microcellular injection molding techniques for the first time. Multiple test methods were used to characterize these materials. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) confirmed the existence of the two components in the blends; differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) confirmed the immiscibility between the TPU and PLA. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images verified that, at the composition ratios studied, PLA was dispersed as spheres or islands inside the TPU matrix and that this phase morphology further influenced the scaffold’s microstructure and surface roughness. The blends exhibited a large range of mechanical properties that covered several human tissue requirements. 3T3 fibroblast cell culture showed that the scaffolds supported cell proliferation and migration properly. Most importantly, this study demonstrated the feasibility of mass producing biocompatible PLA/TPU scaffolds with tunable microstructures, surface roughnesses, and mechanical properties that have the potential to be used as artificial scaffolds in multiple tissue engineering applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Santerre, J. P., Woodhouse, K., Laroche, G., & Labow, R. S. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.079 · Cited by 718
Cited by
Poly (lactic acid) blends: Processing, properties and applications
Nofar, M., Sacligil, D., Carreau, P. J., Kamal, M. R., & Heuzey, M.-C. (2019) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.002 · Cited by 780
Polylactic acid blends: The future of green, light and tough
Hamad, K., Kaseem, M., Ayyoob, M., Joo, J., & Deri, F. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.07.001 · Cited by 640
Biodegradable and biocompatible polymers for tissue engineering application: A review
Asghari, F., Samiei, M., Adibkia, K., Akbarzadeh, A., & Davaran, S. (2017) · Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/21691401.2016.1146731 · Cited by 482
Fabrication of Biomedical Scaffolds Using Biodegradable Polymers.
Kirillova, A., Yeazel, T. R., Asheghali, D., Petersen, S. R., Dort, S., Gall, K., & Becker, M. L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01200 · Cited by 368
Cai, S., Sun, Y.-C., Ren, J., & Naguib, H. E. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c7tb02068f · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Mi, H.-Y., Salick, M. R., Jing, X., Jacques, B. R., Crone, W. C., Peng, X.-F., & Turng, L.-S.
- Venue
- Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4767-4776
- ISSN
- 0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996515447
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/polylactic acid (TPU/PLA) tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by microcellular injection molding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.037
- The paper
- Mi, H.-Y., Salick, M. R., Jing, X., Jacques, B. R., Crone, W. C., Peng, X.-F., & Turng, L.-S. (2013). Characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/polylactic acid (TPU/PLA) tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by microcellular injection molding. Materials Science and Engineering: C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.