Mechanical and thermal property characterization of poly- l -lactide (PLLA) scaffold developed using pressure-controllable green foaming technology
Abstract
Poly-l-lactide (PLLA) is one of the most promising biological materials used for tissue engineering scaffolds (TES) because of their excellent biodegradability and tenability. Here, microcellular PLLA foams were fabricated by pressure-controllable green foaming technology. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), wide angle X-ray diffraction measurement (WAXRD), thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, reflection-Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis, enzymatic degradation study and MTT assay were used to analyze the scaffolds' morphologies, structures and crystallinities, mechanical and biodegradation properties, as well as their cytotoxicity. The results showed that PLLA foams with pore sizes from 8 to 103μm diameters were produced when the saturation pressure decreased from 7.0 to 4.0MPa. Through a combination of StepScan DSC (SSDSC) and WAXRD approaches, it was observed in PLLA foams that the crystallinity, highly-oriented metastable state and rigid amorphous phase increased with the increasing foaming pressure. It was also found that both the glass transition temperature and apparent enthalpy of PLLA significantly increased after the foaming process, which suggested that the changes of microcellular structure could provide PLLA scaffolds better thermal stability and elasticity. Moreover, MTT assessments suggested that the smaller pore size should benefit cell attachment and growth in the scaffold. The results of current work will give us better understanding of the mechanisms involved in structure and property changes of PLLA at the molecular level, which enables more possibilities for the design of PLLA scaffold to satisfy various requirements in biomedical and green chemical applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With increasing molecular weight of the PLLA block, obvious diffraction peaks appear at 16.5° and 18.7°, assigned to the (200)/(110) and (203) planes of α crystal formed by homo-crystallization of poly(lactide).
“With increasing of the molecular weight of PLLA block, there exhibit the obvious diffraction peaks at 16.5° and 18.7°, assigned to the (200)/(110) and (203) planes of α crystal formed by the homo-crystallization of poly(lactide), respectively.36”
From Crystallization, thermal and mechanical properties of stereocomplexed poly(lactide) with flexible PLLA/PCL multiblock copolymer (2022) · cites this paper as [36]
The sc-PLA blend exhibits obvious diffraction peaks at about 12.0°, 16.9°, 18.9°, 20.7° and 24.0°, with the peaks at 12.0°, 20.7° and 24.0° attributed to stereocomplex crystals and those at 16.9° and 18.9° assigned to homo-crystallization crystals.
“For sc-PLA blend, there exhibits several obvious diffraction peaks at about 12.0°, 16.9°, 18.9°, 20.7° and 24.0°.”
From Crystallization, thermal and mechanical properties of stereocomplexed poly(lactide) with flexible PLLA/PCL multiblock copolymer (2022) · cites this paper as [36]
Cites
Pluta, M. (2004) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.057 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Morphological behaviour of poly(lactic acid) during hydrolytic degradation
Zhang, X., Espiritu, M., Bilyk, A., & Kurniawan, L. (2008) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.06.007 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jing, Z., Huang, X., Liu, X., Liao, M., Zhang, Z., & Li, Y. (2022) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra00461e · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sheng, S.-J., Hu, X., Wang, F., Ma, Q.-Y., & Gu, M.-F.
- Affiliations
- Rowan University (US)
- Nanjing Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Fang
- ORCID
- Venue
- Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 49
- Pages
- 612-622
- ISSN
- 0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060518394
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11274176, 11474166)
- Analysis Method and Technology Guide Project of Science & Technology Department of Jiangsu Province (JKYB201401)
- Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (JSYSXK2014)
- Nanjing Laboratory Platform Foundation (1640703064)
- Nanjing Normal University Visiting Scholarship Foundation of China (NJNU20121217)
- Rowan University (10110-60930-7460-12)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- poly(L-lactic acid), tissue engineering scaffolds, microcellular foams, pore size, crystallinity, metastable amorphous phase, glass transition temperature, thermal stability, mechanical properties, biodegradation, cytotoxicity, cell attachment
- MeSH terms
- Biocompatible Materials, Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Elasticity, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Polyesters, Polymers, Pressure, Temperature, Thermodynamics, Thermogravimetry, X-Ray Diffraction, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review