Importance of crosslinking strategies in designing smart biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: A systematic review
Abstract
Biomaterials are of significant importance in biomedical applications as these biological macromolecules have moderately replaced classical tissue grafting techniques owing to its beneficial properties. Despite of its favourable advantages, poor mechanical and degradative properties of biomaterials are of great concern. To this regard, crosslinkers have emerged as a smart and promising tool to augment the biological functionality of biopolymers. Different crosslinkers have been extensively used in past decades to develop bone substitutes, but the implications of toxic response and adverse reactions are truly precarious after implantation. Traditional crosslinker like glutaraldehyde has been widely used in numerous bio-implants but the potential toxicity is largely being debated with many disproving views. As alternative, green chemicals, enzymatic and non-enzymatic chemicals, bi-functional epoxies, zero-length crosslinkers and physical crosslinkers have been introduced to achieve the desired properties of a bone substitute. In this review, systematic literature search was performed on PubMed database to identify the most commonly used crosslinkers for developing promising bone like materials. The relevant articles were identified, analysed and reviewed in this paper giving due importance to different crosslinking methodologies and comparing their effectiveness and efficacy in regard to material composition, scaffold production, crosslinker dosage, toxicity and immunogenicity. This review summarizes the recent developments in crosslinking mechanism with an emphasis placed on their ability to link proteins through bonding reactions. Finally, this study also covers the convergent and divergent methodologies of crosslinking strategies also giving special importance in retrieving the current limitations and future opportunities of crosslinking modalities in bone tissue engineering.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Long-standing leach of GA residues and free aldehyde groups out of GA-treated scaffold prolongs detrimental effects.
“Long-standing leach of GA residues and free aldehyde groups out of GA-treated scaffold prolongs these detrimental effects [197, 199, 201].”
From Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (2023) · cites this paper as [199]
GA application confronts significant hurdles associated with its immunogenicity, cytotoxicity, and calcifying effects.
“Undesirably, GA application per se confronts significant hurdles associated with its immunogenicity, cytotoxicity, and calcifying effects.”
From Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (2023) · cites this paper as [199]
GA increases ECM resistance to chemical and enzymatic degradation and alleviates immunogenicity of biological implants and enhances their longevity via masking immunogenic sites.
“This crosslinker increases ECM resistance to chemical and enzymatic degradation [198, 199] and, most importantly, alleviates the immunogenicity of biological implants and consequently enhances their longevity via masking immunogenic sites [198].”
From Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (2023) · cites this paper as [199]
EDC/NHS crosslinking significantly blocks cell attachment sites, and its treatment concentration needs precise regulation.
“However, EDC/NHS crosslinking significantly blocks cell attachment sites, and its treatment concentration needs precise regulation [199].”
From Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (2023) · cites this paper as [199]
Genipin's cytotoxicity is dose-dependent but time-independent, and in concentrations up to 0.5 mM it has optimal biocompatibility and is considered safe in most tissues.
“Its cytotoxicity is dose-dependent but time-independent, and in concentrations up to 0.5 mM has optimal biocompatibility and is considered safe in most tissues [199, 201].”
From Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (2023) · cites this paper as [199]
EDC crosslinks proteins without being a part of the final scaffold but with less potency than GA and genipin, making cytocompatibility of crosslinked products negligible.
“Despite GA and genipin, EDC crosslinks proteins without being a part of the final scaffold but with less potency, making the cytocompatibility of crosslinked products negligible.”
From Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (2023) · cites this paper as [199]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 149 · Cited by 114
- Authors
- Krishnakumar, G. S., Sampath, S., Muthusamy, S., & John, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Bannari Amman Institute of Technology (IN)
- Central Leather Research Institute (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar
- Venue
- Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 96
- Pages
- 941-954
- ISSN
- 0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904360460
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 149
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Indian Council of Medical Research (2017-2789/CMB-BMS)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Keywords
- crosslinking, bone tissue engineering, bone substitutes, crosslinking agents, enzymatic crosslinking, physical crosslinking, biopolymer scaffolds, immunogenicity, crosslinking mechanism
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bone and Bones, Cross-Linking Reagents, Humans, Bone Substitutes, Tissue Engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review