Cited by 114Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsCollagen: Extraction and CharacterizationHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Importance of crosslinking strategies in designing smart biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: A systematic review

Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar, Sampath, Sowndarya, Muthusamy, Shalini, John, Mary Arlene·2019·Materials Science and Engineering: C

Abstract

Biomaterials are of significant importance in biomedical applications as these biological macromolecules have moderately replaced classical tissue grafting techniques owing to its beneficial properties. Despite of its favourable advantages, poor mechanical and degradative properties of biomaterials are of great concern. To this regard, crosslinkers have emerged as a smart and promising tool to augment the biological functionality of biopolymers. Different crosslinkers have been extensively used in past decades to develop bone substitutes, but the implications of toxic response and adverse reactions are truly precarious after implantation. Traditional crosslinker like glutaraldehyde has been widely used in numerous bio-implants but the potential toxicity is largely being debated with many disproving views. As alternative, green chemicals, enzymatic and non-enzymatic chemicals, bi-functional epoxies, zero-length crosslinkers and physical crosslinkers have been introduced to achieve the desired properties of a bone substitute. In this review, systematic literature search was performed on PubMed database to identify the most commonly used crosslinkers for developing promising bone like materials. The relevant articles were identified, analysed and reviewed in this paper giving due importance to different crosslinking methodologies and comparing their effectiveness and efficacy in regard to material composition, scaffold production, crosslinker dosage, toxicity and immunogenicity. This review summarizes the recent developments in crosslinking mechanism with an emphasis placed on their ability to link proteins through bonding reactions. Finally, this study also covers the convergent and divergent methodologies of crosslinking strategies also giving special importance in retrieving the current limitations and future opportunities of crosslinking modalities in bone tissue engineering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.081

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 149 · Cited by 114

Authors
Krishnakumar, G. S., Sampath, S., Muthusamy, S., & John, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Bannari Amman Institute of Technology (IN)
  • Central Leather Research Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: C
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
96
Pages
941-954
ISSN
0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904360460
Cited by
114
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Council of Medical Research (2017-2789/CMB-BMS)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
crosslinking, bone tissue engineering, bone substitutes, crosslinking agents, enzymatic crosslinking, physical crosslinking, biopolymer scaffolds, immunogenicity, crosslinking mechanism
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone and Bones, Cross-Linking Reagents, Humans, Bone Substitutes, Tissue Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review