Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Zirconia surface modifications for implant dentistry

Open access
Schünemann, Fernanda H., Galárraga-Vinueza, María E., Magini, Ricardo, Fredel, Márcio, Silva, Filipe, Souza, Júlio C.M., Zhang, Yu, Henriques, Bruno·2019·Materials Science and Engineering: C

Abstract

Background: Zirconia has emerged as a versatile dental material due to its excellent aesthetic outcomes such as color and opacity, unique mechanical properties that can mimic the appearance of natural teeth and decrease peri-implant inflammatory reactions. Objective: The aim of this review was to critically explore the state of art of zirconia surface treatment to enhance its biological and osseointegration behavior in implant dentistry. Materials and Methods: An electronic search in PubMed database was carried out until May 2018 using the following combination of key words and MeSH terms without time periods: “zirconia surface treatment” or “zirconia surface modification” or “zirconia coating” and “osseointegration” or “biological properties” or “bioactivity” or “functionally graded properties”. Results: Previous studies have reported the influence of zirconia-based implant surface on the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblast and fibroblasts at the implant to bone interface during the osseointegration process. A large number of physicochemical methods have been used to change the implant surfaces to improve the early and late bone-to-implant integration, namely: acid etching, gritblasting, laser treatment, UV light, CVD, and PVD. The development of coatings composed of silica, magnesium, graphene, dopamine, and bioactive molecules has been assessed although the development of a functionally graded material for implants has shown encouraging mechanical and biological behavior. Conclusion: Modified zirconia surfaces clearly demonstrate faster osseointegration than that on untreated surfaces. However, there is no consensus regarding the surface treatment and consequent morphological aspects of the surfaces to enhance osseointegration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.062

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Schünemann, F. H., Galárraga-Vinueza, M. E., Magini, R., Fredel, M., Silva, F., Souza, J. C. M., Zhang, Y., & Henriques, B.
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: C
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
98
Pages
1294-1305
ISSN
0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2908805298
Cited by
309
References
2
FWCI
35.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zirconia surface modifications for implant dentistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.062
The paper
Schünemann, F. H., Galárraga-Vinueza, M. E., Magini, R., Fredel, M., Silva, F., Souza, J. C. M., Zhang, Y., & Henriques, B. (2019). Zirconia surface modifications for implant dentistry. Materials Science and Engineering: C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.062

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.