Morphological and mechanical characterization of 3D printed PLA scaffolds with controlled porosity for trabecular bone tissue replacement
Abstract
Bone transplant is still the gold standard approach when dealing with orthopedic trauma or disease. When this solution is not possible, scaffolding is a possibility provided by bone tissue engineering. To support the regeneration process, damaged bone tissue is removed and replaced by porous scaffold structures. In recent years, additive manufacturing has shown huge potential to produce scaffold structures with the required performance. In the current work, PLA scaffolds with different designs were 3D printed, using optimal manufacturing parameters. Scaffolds with three different porosity values were obtained by changing the filament offset from 571 to 1333 μm. A total of twelve designs were tested under monotonic and dynamic compression conditions. Numerical analysis showed good correlation with experimental results, allowing for a better assessment of scaffold mechanical behavior. Stress relaxation was measured on four different strain levels, assessing scaffold's behavior after implantation and consequent static response over time. Overall, orthogonal design provided better performance, due to improved material deposition. With lower porosity scaffolds equilibrium stress reached 24 MPa after 300 s relaxation time under 4% deformation, and the obtained equilibrium modulus was 428 MPa. Overall, attained results show that 3D printing with PLA can be applied in the manufacture of scaffolds for trabecular bone replacement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The choice of pore size depends on the method used to construct the scaffold and may have an impact on its mechanical and dynamic stability.
“The choice of pore size depends on the method used to construct the scaffold and may have an impact on its mechanical and dynamic stability [88].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
Cites
Fischer, E. W., Sterzel, H. J., & Wegner, G. (1973) · Kolloid-Zeitschrift und Zeitschrift für Polymere · doi:10.1007/bf01498927 · Cited by 1,704 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Kiani, P., Sedighi, M., Kasaeian-Naeini, M., & Jabbari, A. H. (2025) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.082 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baptista, R., & Guedes, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Baptista, R.
- Venue
- Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 111528
- ISSN
- 0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3087893877
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Keywords
- polylactic acid scaffolds, 3D printing, porosity control, mechanical behavior, stress relaxation, dynamic compression, numerical analysis, bone tissue engineering, scaffold design
- MeSH terms
- Cancellous Bone, Polyesters, Porosity, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Printing, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review