Cited by 21biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Investigation of mechanical integrity and high-cycle fatigue behavior of 3D-printed PLA/PCL blend after exposure to a physiological environment

Open access
Kiani, P., Sedighi, M., Kasaeian-Naeini, M., Jabbari, A.H.·2025·Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Abstract

Polylactic-Acid/Polycaprolactone blends are promising biopolymers to be used in bioabsorbable implants, offering a range of mechanical properties which could be tailored according to their final applications. This study investigates the corrosion behavior, tensile properties, and high cycle fatigue performance of 3D-printed PLA/20 %PCL specimens after immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF), a solution that mimics the ionic composition of human plasma to simulate in vivo degradation, for different durations including 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. After 8 weeks of immersion in SBF, pure PLA and PLA/20 %PCL respectively exhibited a weight loss of 1.68 % and 4.33 %, a pH decreases of 18.9 % and 24.3 %, and a water uptake increase of 12.2 % and 16.7 %. Furthermore, ultimate tensile strength (UTS), which represents the maximum stress a material can withstand before failure, decreased by 41 % and 36 %, and Young's Modulus reduced by 45 % and 20 % in the pure PLA and PLA/20 %PCL specimens, respectively. After 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks of immersion, the fatigue limit of the pure PLA respectively decreased by 3 %, 3.8 %, 6.2 %, and 10 %. However, after similar immersion times, PLA/20 %PCL blend showed larger reductions of 3.7 %, 10.3 %, 15.4 %, and 31.8 %, respectively. Despite the steeper decline in fatigue performance, of the PLA/20 %PCL blend, still exhibited a higher fatigue limit after 8 weeks of immersion, compared with that of the corroded pure PLA. This improved fatigue behavior of the PLA/PCL blend could be attributed to its superior toughness and, higher maximum elongation, suggesting its potential as a promising candidate for temporary orthopedic implants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.082

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiani, P., Sedighi, M., Kasaeian-Naeini, M., & Jabbari, A. H.
Affiliations
Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Sedighi, M.
Venue
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
36
Pages
3671-3683
ISSN
  • 2214-0697 (ISSN-L)
  • 2238-7854
OpenAlex
W4409284225
Cited by
21
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Materials Research and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Keywords
polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, PLA/PCL blends, 3D printing, high cycle fatigue, simulated body fluid, biodegradation, bioabsorbable implants, tensile properties, fatigue limit, water absorption, weight loss, orthopedic implants, biopolymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review