Cited by 7Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsCollagen: Extraction and CharacterizationSilk-based biomaterials and applications

Engineered dual affinity protein fragments to bind collagen and capture growth factors

Open access
Sarrigiannidis, Stylianos O., Dobre, Oana, Navarro, Alexandre Rodrigo, Dalby, Matthew J., Gonzalez-Garcia, Cristina, Salmeron-Sanchez, Manuel·2023·Materials Today Bio

Abstract

Collagen type I lacks affinity for growth factors (GFs) and yet it is clinically used to deliver bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP-2), a potent osteogenic growth factor. To mitigate this lack of affinity, supra-physiological concentrations of BMP-2 are loaded in collagen sponges leading to uncontrolled BMP-2 leakage out of the material. This has led to important adverse side effects such as carcinogenesis. Here, we design recombinant dual affinity protein fragments, produced in E. Coli, which contain two regions, one that spontaneously binds to collagen and a second one that binds BMP-2. By adding the fragment to collagen sponges, BMP-2 is sequestered enabling solid phase presentation of BMP-2. We demonstrate osteogenesis in vivo with ultra-low doses of BMP-2. Our protein technology enhances the biological activity of collagen without using complex chemistries or changing the manufacturing of the base material and so opens a pathway to clinical translation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100641

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo studies using animal bone defect models demonstrate that PDA-functionalized scaffolds exhibit pronounced bone regeneration capability.

    “In vivo studies using animal bone defect models have demonstrated that such PDA-functionalized scaffolds exhibit pronounced bone regeneration capability, highlighting their potential as alternative therapeutic strategies in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Results section reports bone formation in a mouse forearm defect model, supporting the in vivo bone-regeneration aspect of the claim. But the tested scaffolds were collagen sponges treated with a dual-affinity protein fragment and rhBMP-2, not PDA-functionalized scaffolds; our copy does not establish their use for maxillofacial reconstruction. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Within porous scaffold architectures, PDA deposition improves surface hydrophilicity and cytocompatibility and functions as a mineralization template facilitating apatite nucleation and deposition, and incorporation of PDA nanoparticles into hydrogel matrices markedly enhances their mechanical properties, tissue adhesive strength, and osteogenic activity.

    “Within porous scaffold architectures, PDA deposition not only improves surface hydrophilicity and cytocompatibility but also functions as an effective mineralization template, facilitating apatite nucleation and deposition and thereby establishing a biomimetic microenvironment conducive to bone tissue regeneration.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Martino M.M. Briquez P.S. Güç E. Tortelli F. Kilarski W.W. Metzger S. Rice J.J. Kuhn G.A. Müller R. Swartz M.A. Hubbell J.A. Matrix enhance tissue healing Science 343 2014 1979 885 889 24558160

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarrigiannidis, S. O., Dobre, O., Navarro, A. R., Dalby, M. J., Gonzalez-Garcia, C., & Salmeron-Sanchez, M.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Venue
Materials Today Bio
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
20
Pages
100641
ISSN
2590-0064 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366748226
Cited by
6
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials Today Bio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P001114/1)
  • Medical Research Scotland
  • UK Regenerative Medicine Platform
  • UKRI Medical Research Council (MR/R015651/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Keywords
type I collagen, BMP-2, BMP-2 delivery, growth factor sequestration, collagen-binding protein, collagen sponge, bone formation, recombinant protein engineering, bone tissue engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review