Cited by 70Bone Tissue Engineering Materialsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Improvement of hydrophilicity and cell attachment of polycaprolactone scaffolds using green synthesized carbon dots

Ehtesabi, H., Massah, F.·2021·Materials Today Sustainability

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mtsust.2021.100075

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehtesabi, H., & Massah, F.
Affiliations
Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
Corresponding author
Ehtesabi, H.
Venue
Materials Today Sustainability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
13
Pages
100075
ISSN
2589-2347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3180786523
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Today Sustainability (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
polycaprolactone scaffolds, carbon dots, green synthesis, surface modification, hydrophilicity, cell attachment, mesenchymal cells, cell proliferation, biocompatibility, tissue engineering scaffolds, surface roughness, pore structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review