Student nurses' attitudes to illicit drugs: A grounded theory study
Abstract
The aim of this research was to identify the factors that influence the attitudes of student nurses towards illicit drugs. This insight is important in providing a foundation for the development of educational approaches aimed at challenging what appear to be negative attitudes to illicit drug users within nursing. The absence of a testable hypothesis prior to the investigation led to the generation of theory from the data (inductive enquiry) with a constructivist approach to grounded theory (Charmaz, 2006), being employed. Data generation involved informal conversational interviews (n=12), semi-structured interviews (n=9), four focus groups and an audit of the education received by students (n=61) around substance misuse issues. The final grounded theory indicated that: Student nurses enter training with a wide range of personal experiences relating to illicit drug use. The influences of society's negative views and the image of drug use presented in the press appeared to be significant factors in developing their attitudes on the subject. In the absence of effective approaches to education, and given that many professionals in the practice environment appear to view illicit substance users in a negative way, it is likely that interventions with identified drug users will be influenced by negative attitudes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In CGT, the use of extant theories can develop theoretical sensitivity.
“Also, in contrast to CGGT, the use of extant theories can develop theoretical sensitivity, a literature search orients the researcher, and a research question is developed before the research commences (Charmaz, 2014; Harling & Turner, 2012).”
From Discriminating among grounded theory approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Harling & Turner, 2012
In CGT, a research question is developed before the research commences.
“Also, in contrast to CGGT, the use of extant theories can develop theoretical sensitivity, a literature search orients the researcher, and a research question is developed before the research commences (Charmaz, 2014; Harling & Turner, 2012).”
From Discriminating among grounded theory approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Harling & Turner, 2012
In CGT, a literature search orients the researcher.
“Also, in contrast to CGGT, the use of extant theories can develop theoretical sensitivity, a literature search orients the researcher, and a research question is developed before the research commences (Charmaz, 2014; Harling & Turner, 2012).”
From Discriminating among grounded theory approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Harling & Turner, 2012
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,636 · see citing works
The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781848607941 · Cited by 2,798 · see citing works
Orthodoxy vs. Power: The Defining Traits of Grounded Theory
Hood, J. C. (2007) · The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory · doi:10.4135/9781848607941.n7 · Cited by 248 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This occurred when new data collection activities ceased to add further insights to the enquiry (Charmaz, 2006; Hood, 2007).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Discriminating among grounded theory approaches
Rieger, K. L. (2019) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.12261 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Cultural competence of internationally educated nurses: assessing problems and finding solutions
Neiterman, E., & Bourgeault, I. L. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/084456211304500408 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Smyth, D., Wilson, C., & Searby, A. (2021) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.12923 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harling, M. R., & Turner, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Derby (GB)
- London South Bank University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Harling, Martyn R.
- ORCID
- Harling, Martyn R.
- Venue
- Nurse Education Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-240
- ISSN
- 0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010933495
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Keywords
- nursing students, drug use, nursing education, stigma, professional attitudes, grounded theory
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Theory, Illicit Drugs, Students, Nursing, Nursing Education Research, Nursing Methodology Research, Focus Groups, Substance-Related Disorders, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review