Cited by 248Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice

Orthodoxy vs. Power: The Defining Traits of Grounded Theory

Hood, Jane C.·2007·The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781848607941.n7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CGGT, SGT, and CGT are the most extensively developed and used grounded theory approaches.

    “Three of the resultant approaches, CGGT, SGT, and CGT, will be analyzed here as they are the most extensively developed and used (Hood, 2007; Polit & Beck, 2017).”

    From Discriminating among grounded theory approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Hood, 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hood, J. C.
Corresponding author
Hood, Jane C.
Venue
The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory
Published
2007
Pages
151-164
OpenAlex
W2475455765
Cited by
248
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 22
FWCI
38.18
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Keywords
grounded theory, orthodoxy, power, research methodology, epistemology of research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review