Cited by 39HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsParticipatory Visual Research MethodsEmpathy and Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Living with and teaching about HIV: Engaging nursing students through body mapping

Maina, Geoffrey, Sutankayo, Lynn, Chorney, Raymond, Caine, Vera·2014·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

Body mapping, an artistic method of narrating experiences alongside people living with HIV/AIDS (PHAs), was used to educate first year nursing students about social and personal aspects of the illness, including stigma. Body mapping creates a safe space where individuals can discuss personal, emotional, cultural, political and socio-economic dimensions of their lives in relation to HIV/AIDS. The aim of this study is to understand how individuals from multiple perspectives experience body mapping as an educational tool, including a nursing student, an expert facilitator, a PHA and a course professor. The stories they live and tell motivate and inform the content of this study. We conducted three individual in-depth interviews with a student, a PHA and an expert facilitator on their experiences of participating in body mapping. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Field and observational notes were also collected and reflections have been incorporated in this paper. Three themes were derived from our analyses: 1) stock taking narratives, where body mapping serves as a mediator for reflecting, accessing and organizing past experiences; 2) transactional narratives where body mapping creates safe spaces within which relationships are created, and experiences are shared, and 3) give and take narratives that connote transformation of self as a result of participating in body mapping. In conclusion, the body mapping exercise as an educational tool is an opportunity to share experiences, and to learn about and to shift attitudes surrounding HIV/AIDS. Thus, body mapping can be a valuable tool for HIV education for first year nursing students.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.004

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maina, G., Sutankayo, L., Chorney, R., & Caine, V.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Caine, Vera
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
643-647
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018862339
Cited by
39
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
body mapping, HIV/AIDS, nursing students, HIV education, people living with HIV, stigma, arts-based education, experiential learning, safe spaces, personal transformation, nursing education
MeSH terms
Adult, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Paintings, Students, Nursing, HIV Infections, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review