A holistic approach to remote patient monitoring, fueled by ChatGPT and Metaverse technology: the future of nursing education
Abstract
ChatGPT and Metaverse are contemporary artificial intelligence tools that are increasingly being used in healthcare professional training, particularly for remote patient monitoring. These technologies offer immersive and personalized learning experiences for nurses, improving their skills and confidence in managing remote patient care. ChatGPT can create simulated patient interactions that mimic real-life scenarios, while the Metaverse can provide virtual reality simulations and scenarios for nurses to practice and learn in a safe and controlled environment. The unification of ChatGPT and Metaverse technology in nursing education can enrich the learning experience and equip nurses with the necessary skills for remote patient monitoring, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and quality of care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Benefits of GenAI-enhanced simulation are particularly evident in mental health and paediatric scenarios, where communication skills are paramount.
“These benefits are particularly evident in mental health and paediatric scenarios, where communication skills are paramount (Cox et al., 2023; Jung, 2023; Sharma and Sharma, 2023; Sharpnack, 2024).”
From Patterns, advances, and gaps in using ChatGPT and similar technologies in nursing education: A PAGER scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as Sharma and Sharma, 2023
Cites
What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x · Cited by 2,003 · see citing works
Choi, E. P. H., Lee, J. J., Ho, M.-H., Kwok, J. Y. Y., & Lok, K. Y. W. (2023) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105796 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gunawan, J., Aungsuroch, Y., & Montayre, J. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106323 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Summers, A., Haddad, M. E., Prichard, R., Clarke, K.-A., Lee, J., & Oprescu, F. (2024) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104062 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Durmuş Sarıkahya, S., Özbay, Ö., Torpuş, K., Usta, G., & Çınar Özbay, S. (2025) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106755 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Embracing the future: Integrating ChatGPT into China’s nursing education system
Ni, Z., Peng, R., Zheng, X., & Xie, P. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.006 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Amankwaa, I., Ekpor, E., Cudjoe, D., Kobiah, E., Fuseini, A.-K. J., Diebieri, M., Gyamfi, S., & Brownie, S. (2025) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106822 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Generative artificial intelligence in healthcare simulation-based education: A scoping review
Neo, N. W. S., Gunawan, J., Levett-Jones, T., Khoo, E. T., Chua, W. L., & Liaw, S. Y. (2025) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101819 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Kim, J., Won, J., & Lee, Y. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104536 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sharma, M., & Sharma, S.
- Affiliations
- DAV University (IN)
- Guru Nanak Dev University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sharma, Manik
- Venue
- Nurse Education Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 131
- Pages
- 105972
- ISSN
- 0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386645372
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- remote patient monitoring, ChatGPT, metaverse, nursing education, virtual reality simulation, remote patient care
- MeSH terms
- Virtual Reality, Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Education, Nursing, Humans, Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
