Cited by 2,473Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

UALCAN: An update to the integrated cancer data analysis platform

Open access
Chandrashekar, Darshan Shimoga, Karthikeyan, Santhosh Kumar, Korla, Praveen Kumar, Patel, Henalben, Shovon, Ahmedur Rahman, Athar, Mohammad, Netto, George J., Qin, Zhaohui S. +4 more·2022·Neoplasia

Abstract

Cancer genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic profiling has generated extensive data that necessitate the development of tools for its analysis and dissemination. We developed UALCAN to provide a portal for easy exploring, analyzing, and visualizing these data, allowing users to integrate the data to better understand the gene, proteins, and pathways perturbed in cancer and make discoveries. UALCAN web portal enables analyzing and delivering cancer transcriptome, proteomics, and patient survival data to the cancer research community. With data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, UALCAN has enabled users to evaluate protein-coding gene expression and its impact on patient survival across 33 types of cancers. The web portal has been used extensively since its release and received immense popularity, underlined by its usage from cancer researchers in more than 100 countries. The present manuscript highlights the task we have undertaken and updates that we have made to UALCAN since its release in 2017. Extensive user feedback motivated us to expand the resource by including data on a) microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and promoter DNA methylation from TCGA and b) mass spectrometry-based proteomics from the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC). UALCAN provides easy access to pre-computed, tumor subgroup-based gene/protein expression, promoter DNA methylation status, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. It also provides new visualization features to comprehend and integrate observations and aids in generating hypotheses for testing. UALCAN is accessible at http://ualcan.path.uab.edu.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neo.2022.01.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In human HCCs, higher expression of GSTM3 was associated with shorter survival.

    “In human HCCs, higher expression of GSTM3 was associated with shorter survival (fig. S7E) (44, 45).”

    From The origin of hepatocellular carcinoma depends on metabolic zonation (2026) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Methods section (Survival analyses; page not provided) describes how UALCAN compares survival by expression level. Searches for GSTM3 and HCC found no passage in our copy reporting whether higher GSTM3 expression is associated with shorter survival in human HCCs. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]Blackadar CB Historical review of the causes of cancer World J Clin Oncol 7 1 2016 54 86 26862491 PMC4734938
  2. [2]Gan X Wang T Chen ZY Zhang KH Blood-derived molecular signatures as biomarker panels for the early detection of colorectal cancer Mol Biol Rep 47 10 2020 8159 8168 32979165
  3. [3]Sopyllo K Erickson AM Mirtti T Grading Evolution and Contemporary Prognostic Biomarkers of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Cancers (Basel) 13 4 2021 PMC7914622 33562508
  4. [4]Srivastava A Gupta A Patidar S Review of biomarker systems as an alternative for early diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma Clin Transl Oncol 23 10 2021 1967 1978 33840014
  5. [5]Chandrashekar DS Bashel B Balasubramanya SAH Creighton CJ Ponce-Rodriguez I Chakravarthi B UALCAN: A Portal for Facilitating Tumor Subgroup Gene Expression and Survival Analyses Neoplasia 19 8 2017 649 658 28732212 PMC5516091
  6. [6]Zhu Y Qiu P Ji Y TCGA-assembler: open-source software for retrieving and processing TCGA data Nat Methods 11 6 2014 599 600 24874569 PMC4387197
  7. [7]Chen F Chandrashekar DS Varambally S Creighton CJ Pan-cancer molecular subtypes revealed by mass-spectrometry-based proteomic characterization of more than 500 human cancers Nat Commun 10 1 2019 5679 31831737 PMC6908580
  8. [8]Monsivais D Vasquez YM Chen F Zhang Y Chandrashekar DS Faver JC Mass-spectrometry-based proteomic correlates of grade and stage reveal pathways and kinases associated with aggressive human cancers Oncogene 40 11 2021 2081 2095 33627787 PMC7981264
  9. [9]Xu K Wu ZJ Groner AC He HH Cai C Lis RT EZH2 oncogenic activity in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells is Polycomb-independent Science 338 6113 2012 1465 1469 23239736 PMC3625962
  10. [10]Asangani IA Dommeti VL Wang X Malik R Cieslik M Yang R Therapeutic targeting of BET bromodomain proteins in castration-resistant prostate cancer Nature 510 7504 2014 278 282 24759320 PMC4075966
  11. [11]Malinen M Niskanen EA Kaikkonen MU Palvimo JJ Crosstalk between androgen and pro-inflammatory signaling remodels androgen receptor and NF-kappaB cistrome to reprogram the prostate cancer cell transcriptome Nucleic Acids Res 45 2 2017 619 630 27672034 PMC5314794
  12. [12]Kedage V Selvaraj N Nicholas TR Budka JA Plotnik JP Jerde TJ An Interaction with Ewing's Sarcoma Breakpoint Protein EWS Defines a Specific Oncogenic Mechanism of ETS Factors Rearranged in Prostate Cancer Cell Rep 17 5 2016 1289 1301 27783944 PMC5123826
  13. [13]Bose R Karthaus WR Armenia J Abida W Iaquinta PJ Zhang Z ERF mutations reveal a balance of ETS factors controlling prostate oncogenesis Nature 546 7660 2017 671 675 28614298 PMC5576182
  14. [14]Franco HL Nagari A Malladi VS Li W Xi Y Richardson D Enhancer transcription reveals subtype-specific gene expression programs controlling breast cancer pathogenesis Genome Res 28 2 2018 159 170 29273624 PMC5793780
  15. [15]Singh AA Schuurman K Nevedomskaya E Stelloo S Linder S Droog M Optimized ChIP-seq method facilitates transcription factor profiling in human tumors Life Sci Alliance 2 1 2019 e201800115 PMC6311467 30620009
  16. [16]Jain P Ballare C Blanco E Vizan P Di Croce L PHF19 mediated regulation of proliferation and invasiveness in prostate cancer cells Elife 9 2020 PMC7064337 32155117
  17. [17]Agarwal V Bell GW Nam JW Bartel DP Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs Elife 4 2015 PMC4532895 26267216
  18. [18]Betel D Wilson M Gabow A Marks DS Sander C The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression Nucleic Acids Res 36 2008 D149 D153 (Database issue) 18158296 PMC2238905
  19. [19]Wang X miRDB: a microRNA target prediction and functional annotation database with a wiki interface RNA 14 6 2008 1012 1017 18426918 PMC2390791
  20. [20]Zhou Z Shen Y Khan MR Li A LncReg: a reference resource for lncRNA-associated regulatory networks Database (Oxford). 2015 2015 PMC4565966 26363021
  21. [21]Jiang Q Wang J Wu X Ma R Zhang T Jin S LncRNA2Target: a database for differentially expressed genes after lncRNA knockdown or overexpression Nucleic Acids Res 43 2015 D193 D196 (Database issue) 25399422 PMC4383967
  22. [23]Ramirez F Ryan DP Gruning B Bhardwaj V Kilpert F Richter AS deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis Nucleic Acids Res 44 W1 2016 W160 W165 27079975 PMC4987876
  23. [24]Zhang Y Liu T Meyer CA Eeckhoute J Johnson DS Bernstein BE Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biol 9 9 2008 R137 18798982 PMC2592715

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandrashekar, D. S., Karthikeyan, S. K., Korla, P. K., Patel, H., Shovon, A. R., Athar, M., Netto, G. J., Qin, Z. S., Kumar, S., Manne, U., Creighton, C. J., & Varambally, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Chandrashekar, Darshan Shimoga
Venue
Neoplasia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
25
Pages
18-27
ISSN
1476-5586 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206965224
Cited by
2,473
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 439 · 2025: 675 · 2024: 737 · 2023: 495 · 2022: 124
FWCI
170.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neoplasia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-19-1-0588, CA125123)
  • National Institutes of Health (U54 CA118948)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
cancer transcriptomics, cancer proteomics, gene expression, protein expression, promoter methylation, microRNA, long non-coding RNA, TCGA, CPTAC, tumor subtypes, data visualization, web portal
MeSH terms
Data Analysis, Humans, Neoplasms, DNA Methylation, Gene Expression Profiling, Genomics, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review