The origin of hepatocellular carcinoma depends on metabolic zonation
Open accessAbstract
The origin of cancer is poorly understood because premalignant cells are rarely followed in their native environments. Although the spatial compartmentalization of metabolic functions is critical for proper liver function, it is unknown whether cancers arise from some zones but not others and whether there are metabolic determinants of cancer risk. Zone-specific, mosaic introduction of Ctnnb1 (catenin beta 1) and Arid2 (AT-rich interaction domain 2) mutations, commonly co-mutated genes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in mouse models showed that position and metabolic context determine clone fates. Ctnnb1 / Arid2 -driven cancers were much more likely to arise in zone 3. The zone 3 genes Gstm2 and Gstm3 were required for efficient HCC initiation, in part through inhibition of ferroptosis. In the liver, the zonal determinants of HCC development can reveal metabolic vulnerabilities of cancer.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Using zone-specific CreER mouse models, this study shows that Ctnnb1/Arid2 mutant hepatocytes are maintained in zone 1 but lost in zone 3, yet hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arises much more often from zone 3. Zone 3–enriched Gstm2/Gstm3 suppress ferroptosis in premalignant hepatocytes, and inhibiting or overexpressing Gstm3 can reduce HCC initiation or shift tumor origin toward zone 1.
Key findings
- Ctnnb1/Arid2 mutant clones were preserved in zone 1 but progressively lost in zone 3 over 6 to 12 months. At 5 months after tamoxifen, single-nuclear genotyping showed zone 1 livers had 63% nonmutant, 8.3% Ctnnb1 single-mutant, 21% Arid2 single-mutant, and 7.3% double-mutant cells; zone 3 livers had 88% nonmutant, 0.62% Ctnnb1 single-mutant, 11% Arid2 single-mutant, and 0.69% double-mutant cells.
- Despite poorer clone maintenance in zone 3, Ctnnb1/Arid2-driven cancers arose more often there: 38/42 zone 3 mice (90%) developed at least one visible surface tumor versus 13/22 zone 1 mice (59%), with mean surface tumors 9.62 versus 3.68 (P = 0.0002). Blinded histology found malignant lesions in 15/25 zone 3 mice (60%) versus 2/16 zone 1 mice (12.5%).
- Zone 3–enriched Gstm2 and Gstm3 were required for efficient HCC initiation. Gstm2 or Gstm3 deletion impaired tumor initiation, and ethacrynic acid reduced microtumor area by 75%. Gstm3 overexpression in zone 1 shifted tumor origin: 52/85 HCCs (61%) were Tomato+ in overexpression mice versus 8/37 (22%) in controls (chi-square P = 0.000059).
- Other HCC models also showed zone 3 bias: DEN-induced tumors and NRAS/shp53-driven tumors arose primarily from zone 3, and Gstm3 deletion increased survival in NRAS/shp53 mice.
Methods
- The study used mouse CreER lines for zone-specific recombination: Gls2-CreERT2 for zone 1, Cyp1a2-CreERT2 for zones 2/3 (more frequently zone 3), ApoC4-CreERT2 for pan-zonal labeling, and Igfbp2-CreER for zone 2. Ctnnb1(ex3)fl/+ and Arid2fl/fl alleles were induced with tamoxifen, with Rosa26LSL-tdTomato lineage tracing and glutamine synthetase (Glul/GS) as a marker of Ctnnb1 activation.
- Analyses included immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence, computational GS image quantification, EdU/Ki-67 proliferation assays, single-nuclear DNA sequencing on the Mission Bio Tapestri platform, 10x Xenium spatial transcriptomics with a custom 440-gene panel, bulk RNA-seq, RT-qPCR, hydrodynamic transfection with Sleeping Beauty plasmids for CTNNB1/MYC HCC and CRISPR deletion of zonated genes, AAV and siRNA-LNP perturbations, ethacrynic acid treatment, and ferroptosis/cell-death assays in HCC53N and HCC53M cells and primary hepatocytes.
- Human co-mutation analysis used cBioPortal and published HCC datasets; statistics used GraphPad Prism with two-tailed Student’s t tests and log-rank tests unless otherwise noted.
Limitations
- The paper does not include a dedicated limitations section. Stated caveats include that ethacrynic acid inhibits tumor initiation but its effect on progression is unknown, that ethacrynic acid likely acts through GSTM2, GSTM3, and other targets, and that the CTNNB1/MYC hydrodynamic model was not identical to the Ctnnb1/Arid2 model.
- The text also notes that CreER recombination was not 100% efficient and occurred less efficiently at the Ctnnb1 locus than at the Rosa26LSL-tdTomato locus, and that tumors from different zones did not segregate transcriptionally, suggesting established tumors may not reveal the original zonal differences.
- Evident from the study design: most mechanistic evidence comes from mouse models and cell lines, with human data limited to mutation co-occurrence and expression comparisons; the authors state that zonal origins of different liver cancer subtypes should be further explored.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
52 of 67 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Previous studies have shown that cells in zone 3 can transform into HCC.
“Previous studies have shown that cells in zone 3 can transform into HCC (22–24), but there has not been a head-to-head comparison to assess cancer formation from different zones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] Adebayo Michael AO Inhibiting glutamine-dependent mTORC1 activation ameliorates liver cancers driven by β-catenin mutations. Cell Metab. 29, 1135– 1150.e6 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.01.002 30713111 PMC6506359 source
The Introduction describes β-catenin activity in zone-3 hepatocytes and β-catenin mutations in some HCCs. The Results localize GS and p-mTOR-S2448 to zone-3 hepatocytes in normal liver, but neither passage establishes that those cells transformed into HCC. Searches for pericentral HCC origin and zone-3 tumor initiation found no passage demonstrating that transition. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] Kurosaki S Cell fate analysis of zone 3 hepatocytes in liver injury and tumorigenesis. JHEP Rep. 3, 100315 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100315 34345813 PMC8319533 source
- cites [24] Ang CH Lgr5+ pericentral hepatocytes are self-maintained in normal liver regeneration and susceptible to hepatocarcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 116, 19530– 19540 (2019). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908099116 31488716 PMC6765306 source
- Premisecitation
The HCC driver genes TP53 and CTNNB1 are not the most frequently observed mutant genes in the cirrhotic liver.
“The HCC driver genes TP53 (tumor protein p53) and CTNNB1 (catenin beta 1) are not the most frequently observed mutant genes in the cirrhotic liver (7–9), suggesting that these mutations do not drive extensive clonal expansion events before tumor initiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Zhu M Somatic mutations increase hepatic clonal fitness and regeneration in chronic liver disease. Cell 177, 608– 621.e12 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.026 30955891 PMC6519461 source
- cites [8] Brunner SF Somatic mutations and clonal dynamics in healthy and cirrhotic human liver. Nature 574, 538– 542 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1670-9 31645727 PMC6837891 source
The driver-mutation analysis (section labelled Abstract; page unavailable) identifies ALB and ACVR2A, rather than TP53 or CTNNB1, as significant among the 30 HCC genes tested. It does not give a gene-frequency ranking specifically for cirrhotic liver; its reported variants combine normal and cirrhotic samples. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] Ng SWK Convergent somatic mutations in metabolism genes in chronic liver disease. Nature 598, 473– 478 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03974-6; 34646017 source
No passage from our copy addresses whether TP53 and CTNNB1 are among the most frequently mutated genes in cirrhotic liver. Searches for both gene names and for mutations in cirrhosis returned only bibliographic material, with no findings or page-level evidence to assess the claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
TP53 and CTNNB1 mutations do not drive extensive clonal expansion events before tumor initiation.
“The HCC driver genes TP53 (tumor protein p53) and CTNNB1 (catenin beta 1) are not the most frequently observed mutant genes in the cirrhotic liver (7–9), suggesting that these mutations do not drive extensive clonal expansion events before tumor initiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Zhu M Somatic mutations increase hepatic clonal fitness and regeneration in chronic liver disease. Cell 177, 608– 621.e12 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.026 30955891 PMC6519461 source
The Results (Ultra-deep targeted sequencing identified recurrent somatic mutations; page unavailable) report TRP53 mutations in 6% of patients and say CTNNB1 was not detected in more than two patients, suggesting different selection pressures in HCC and background liver. These findings support the citing sentence’s observation about mutation frequency, but the paper does not establish that TP53 and CTNNB1 mutations do not drive extensive clonal expansion before tumor initiation. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [8] Brunner SF Somatic mutations and clonal dynamics in healthy and cirrhotic human liver. Nature 574, 538– 542 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1670-9 31645727 PMC6837891 source
The concluding passage (labeled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) says driver mutations in non-malignant liver did not drive large clonal expansions. The driver-screening passage in the same section identifies other genes but does not establish this finding specifically for TP53 or CTNNB1, or show how frequently those two genes were mutated in cirrhotic liver. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] Ng SWK Convergent somatic mutations in metabolism genes in chronic liver disease. Nature 598, 473– 478 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03974-6; 34646017 source
No passage from our copy addresses whether TP53 or CTNNB1 mutations drive extensive clonal expansion before tumor initiation. Searches for both genes and for clonal expansion in cirrhotic liver returned no relevant passage, so the claim cannot be assessed from the available evidence. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Mice with Cre recombinase activity in distinct zonal populations permit induction of HCC mutations in a variety of normal cell types.
“The recent generation of mice with Cre recombinase activity in distinct zonal populations permitted us to induce HCC mutations in a variety of normal cell types (18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Wei Y Liver homeostasis is maintained by midlobular zone 2 hepatocytes. Science 371, eabb1625 (2021). doi: 10.1126/science.abb1625 33632817 PMC8496420 source
- Premisecitation
Activating CTNNB1 mutations on their own may not be sufficient to drive cancer.
“Given that activating CTNNB1 mutations on their own may not be sufficient to drive cancer (26), we sought to co-mutate another gene that would accelerate cancer development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Dong B Activating CAR and β-catenin induces uncontrolled liver growth and tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun 6, 5944 (2015). doi: 10.1038/ncomms6944 25661872 PMC4324535 source
The Introduction and Discussion state that β-catenin activation alone does not induce spontaneous liver tumors in mouse models, indicating that additional hits are needed. The Results likewise report that β-catenin activation alone did not induce liver tumors in the tested mice. This supports the cautious claim for mouse liver cancer, but the paper does not establish it for cancer generally. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The inefficient CreER recombination faithfully modeled the somatic mosaicism seen in human livers before cancer development.
“While this showed that CreER was not 100% efficient, it also faithfully modeled the somatic mosaicism seen in human livers before cancer development (7–9, 33).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [7] Zhu M Somatic mutations increase hepatic clonal fitness and regeneration in chronic liver disease. Cell 177, 608– 621.e12 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.026 30955891 PMC6519461 source
The Introduction reports somatic mutations and evidence of clonal expansion in non-dysplastic human liver tissue, supporting the claim that mosaicism exists before cancer. The paper does not assess inefficient CreER recombination or establish that it faithfully models that mosaicism; its mouse methods describe other approaches. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [8] Brunner SF Somatic mutations and clonal dynamics in healthy and cirrhotic human liver. Nature 574, 538– 542 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1670-9 31645727 PMC6837891 source
The paper describes non-malignant human liver as a “clonal patchwork” and healthy liver as a community of small clones (Abstract; page unavailable), supporting the claim that mosaicism exists before liver cancer. It does not examine CreER recombination or establish that inefficient recombination faithfully models that mosaicism. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] Ng SWK Convergent somatic mutations in metabolism genes in chronic liver disease. Nature 598, 473– 478 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03974-6; 34646017 source
The supplied passage contains only the paper’s title and author information (no section or page). Searches for somatic mosaicism, CreER recombination, and hepatocyte clones found no eligible passage in our copy establishing that inefficient CreER recombination faithfully models mosaicism in human livers before cancer development. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [33] Wang Z Positive selection of somatically mutated clones identifies adaptive pathways in metabolic liver disease. Cell 186, 1968– 1984.e20 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.014 37040760 PMC10321862 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says the authors established MOSAICS to model widespread somatic mosaicism, supporting the general modeling point. The Results describe an AAV-based system using a Cre fusion protein, not inefficient CreER recombination; the paper does not establish that CreER faithfully reproduces mosaicism in human livers before cancer develops. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Ectopic Ctnnb1 activation by itself induces glutamine synthetase (Glul/GS) expression outside the endogenous GS expression normally observed in a two- to three-cell ring of hepatocytes around the central vein.
“In the liver, ectopic Ctnnb1 activation by itself induces glutamine synthetase (gene: Glul; protein: GS) expression outside of the endogenous GS expression normally observed in a two- to three-cell ring of hepatocytes around the central vein (CV) (28–32).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked- cites [28] Gebhardt R, Mecke D, Heterogeneous distribution of glutamine synthetase among rat liver parenchymal cells in situ and in primary culture. EMBO J. 2, 567– 570 (1983). doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01464.x 6138251 PMC555062 source
The Results (page unavailable) report that GS-positive rat liver cells form a narrow zone, usually 1–3 cell layers, directly around terminal hepatic venules. The paper does not address ectopic Ctnnb1 activation or show that it induces GS expression outside that zone. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [29] Hale G Correlation of exon 3 β-catenin mutations with glutamine synthetase staining patterns in hepatocellular adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Mod. Pathol 29, 1370– 1380 (2016). doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.122 27469330 PMC5149418 source
The Introduction (page not available) says that β-catenin activates GLUL transcription, that normal glutamine synthetase expression is confined to hepatocytes around terminal hepatic venules, and that expression extends through much of β-catenin-activated tumors. It does not specify a two- to three-cell ring or establish that ectopic Ctnnb1 activation by itself induces expression outside that ring; the Discussion (page not available) cautions that the relationship between β-catenin activation and glutamine synthetase staining is complex. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [30] Huang W-J, Tsai J-H, Jeng Y-M, Complementary roles of β-catenin and glutamine synthetase immunostaining in diagnosis of chemotherapy-treated and untreated hepatoblastoma. J. Formos. Med. Assoc 116, 549– 553 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.09.013 28277286 source
The Introduction identifies GS as a downstream target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and the Results report diffuse GS staining in hepatoblastoma versus a perivenular pattern in nontumorous liver. But this immunostaining study does not establish that ectopic Ctnnb1 activation by itself induces GS; the Discussion allows for other mechanisms. Nor does it specify a two- to three-cell ring around the central vein. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [31] Loeppen S Overexpression of glutamine synthetase is associated with β-catenin-mutations in mouse liver tumors during promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis by phenobarbital. Cancer Res. 62, 5685– 5688 (2002). 12384525
- cites [32] Sekine S, Lan BY-A, Bedolli M, Feng S, Hebrok M, Liver-specific loss of β-catenin blocks glutamine synthesis pathway activity and cytochrome p450 expression in mice. Hepatology 43, 817– 825 (2006). doi: 10.1002/hep.21131 16557553 source
- Findingcitation
Among 14 frequently mutated or copy number-altered genes in HCC, CTNNB1 mutations were most likely to co-occur with ARID2 mutations.
“Among 14 frequently mutated or copy number–altered genes in HCC (25), CTNNB1 mutations were most likely to co-occur with ARID2 mutations (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Comprehensive and integrative genomic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 169, 1327– 1341.e23 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046 28622513 PMC5680778 source
- Premisecitation
Many GST protein family members act as tumor promoters by influencing reactive oxygen species (ROS).
“Many GST protein family members act as tumor promoters by influencing reactive oxygen species (ROS) (51–56).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 6 sources checked- cites [51] Collino A, Sustained activation of detoxification pathways promotes liver carcinogenesis in response to chronic bile acid-mediated damage. PLOS Genet. 14, e1007380 (2018). doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007380 29734330 PMC5957449 source
The Results sections on hepatocyte gene expression and detoxification enzymes report that several glutathione S-transferases are upregulated in Mdr2-/- livers and place them within detoxification pathways active during tumor development. They also report an oxidative-stress response, but do not show that GST family members themselves act as tumor promoters by influencing ROS. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [52] Townsend DM, Tew KD, The role of glutathione-S-transferase in anti-cancer drug resistance. Oncogene 22, 7369– 7375 (2003). doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206940 14576844 PMC6361125 source
Table 1 (page unavailable) lists products generated by reactive oxygen species as substrates of α and μ GSTs, and the discussion of GSTs as regulators of the MAP kinase pathway links GSTπ and GSTμ to cell-survival signaling. The paper does not say that many GST family members promote tumors by influencing ROS; it describes elevated GST expression in tumors and says GSTπ may be either a cause or an effect of transformation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [53] Chen T, GSTM3 deficiency impedes DNA mismatch repair to promote gastric tumorigenesis via CAND1/NRF2-KEAP1 signaling. Cancer Lett. 538, 215692 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215692 35487311 source
- cites [54] Huang J, Tan PH, Tan BKH, Bay BH, GST-pi expression correlates with oxidative stress and apoptosis in breast cancer. Oncol. Rep 12, 921– 925 (2004). doi: 10.3892/or.12.4.921 15375523 source
- cites [55] Fiander H, Schneider H, Dietary ortho phenols that induce glutathione S-transferase and increase the resistance of cells to hydrogen peroxide are potential cancer chemopreventives that act by two mechanisms: The alleviation of oxidative stress and the detoxification of mutagenic xenobiotics. Cancer Lett. 156, 117– 124 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(00)00368-2 10880760 source
- cites [56] Cederbaum AI, Nrf2 and antioxidant defense against CYP2E1 toxicity. Subcell. Biochem 67, 105– 130 (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5881-0_2 23400918 source
- Findingcitation
In human HCCs, higher expression of GSTM3 was associated with shorter survival.
“In human HCCs, higher expression of GSTM3 was associated with shorter survival (fig. S7E) (44, 45).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [44] Chandrashekar DS, UALCAN: A portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia 19, 649– 658 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002 28732212 PMC5516091 source
The Methods (Data Analyses; page unavailable) describe survival analyses by gene expression, and the Results (Usage of UALCAN; page unavailable) discuss liver hepatocellular carcinoma. Neither reports a GSTM3 survival result or says whether higher GSTM3 expression is associated with shorter survival. Searches for GSTM3 and its full gene name found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [45] Chandrashekar DS, UALCAN: An update to the integrated cancer data analysis platform. Neoplasia 25, 18– 27 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2022.01.001 35078134 PMC8788199 source
The Methods section (Survival analyses; page not provided) describes how UALCAN compares survival by expression level. Searches for GSTM3 and HCC found no passage in our copy reporting whether higher GSTM3 expression is associated with shorter survival in human HCCs. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Human HCCs with CTNNB1 and ARID2 mutations from two independent studies also showed up-regulation of many of the same WNT pathway genes (NOTUM, AQP9, TBX3, ABCB11, GLUL) as observed in mouse models.
“Notably, human HCCs with CTNNB1 and ARID2 mutations from two independent studies (25, 35) also showed up-regulation of many of the same WNT pathway genes (NOTUM, AQP9, TBX3, ABCB11, GLUL) as observed in our mouse models (fig. S6B and table S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Comprehensive and integrative genomic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 169, 1327– 1341.e23 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046 28622513 PMC5680778 source
The Results sections on Somatic Mutations and Other Signaling Pathways (pages unavailable) report CTNNB1 and ARID2 mutations in human HCC and frequent alterations in WNT signaling. They do not report that HCCs with those mutations up-regulate NOTUM, AQP9, TBX3, ABCB11, or GLUL. Searches for the named genes and their expression did not establish that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [35] Chen L, Deep whole-genome analysis of 494 hepatocellular carcinomas. Nature 627, 586– 593 (2024). doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07054-3 38355797 source
- Premisecitation
CTNNB1 or MYC alone was insufficient to drive cancer within 4 weeks.
“CTNNB1 or MYC alone was insufficient to drive cancer within 4 weeks (38), but delivering both led to carcinogenesis within 1 to 2 weeks on the FVB strain background.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Molina-Sánchez P, Cooperation between distinct cancer driver genes underlies intertumor heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 159, 2203– 2220. e14 (2020). doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.015 32814112 PMC7726023 source
The Results section (‘In vivo screen identifies cooperating driver genes in HCC’; page unavailable) reports that individual genetic alterations were not associated with mortality within eight months and that two drivers were required for efficient liver tumorigenesis in C57BL/6 mice. It does not establish that CTNNB1 or MYC alone failed to produce cancer specifically within four weeks; mortality is not the same measure as tumor formation. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Gstm2 has been shown to increase liver tumorigenesis through inactivation of ASK1, a kinase that promotes apoptosis.
“Gstm2 has been shown to increase liver tumorigenesis through the inactivation of ASK1, a kinase that promotes apoptosis (49, 50).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [49] Lan T, Hepatocyte glutathione S-transferase mu 2 prevents non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by suppressing ASK1 signaling. J. Hepatol 76, 407– 419 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.040 34656650 source
- cites [50] Nakagawa H, Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 inhibits hepatocarcinogenesis by controlling the tumor-suppressing function of stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase. Hepatology 54, 185– 195 (2011). doi: 10.1002/hep.24357; 21488081 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) concludes that ASK1 acts as a tumor suppressor in hepatocarcinogenesis, and the apoptosis results report fewer apoptotic tumor cells in ASK1-deficient mice. The paper supports the ASK1 portion of the claim, but searches for Gstm2 and its proposed inactivation of ASK1 found no passage supporting that mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
At 5 months after tamoxifen, the zone 1 mutant mouse had 63% nonmutant, 8.3% Ctnnb1 single-mutant, 21% Arid2 single-mutant, and 7.3% double-mutant cells.
“At 5 months after tamoxifen, which preceded any cancer development, the zone 1 mutant mouse had 63% nonmutant, 8.3% Ctnnb1 single-mutant, 21% Arid2 single-mutant, and 7.3% double-mutant cells (Fig. 2, E and F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No mice from any of the mutant models developed macroscopic tumors before the 6-month time point.
“No mice from any of the mutant models developed macroscopic tumors before the 6-month time point, so we performed cancer analysis 6 months after tamoxifen (Fig. 3, A and B, and table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Tumors from both zones did not segregate according to zone of origin in RNA-seq expression.
“We transcriptionally profiled tumors from both zones using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and found that the tumor expression did not segregate according to zone of origin (Fig. 3P and fig. S6A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mutant clones in zones 1 and 3 had high expression of zone 3 genes such as Glul and Cyp1a2.
“Mutant clones in zones 1 and 3 had high expression of zone 3 genes such as Glul and Cyp1a2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the zone 1 mutant liver, GS+ hepatocytes were ectopically located in zone 1.
“In the zone 1 mutant liver, GS+ hepatocytes were ectopically located in zone 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In zone 3 mutant mice, there was a similar absolute number of proliferating hepatocytes in comparison to WT mice.
“In zone 3 mutant mice, there was a similar absolute number of proliferating hepatocytes in comparison to WT mice (fig. S4, A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When considering only 8- to 10-month post-tamoxifen mice, there were still more surface tumors in zone 3 mice (mean 10.3 versus 3.67; P = 0.0253).
“When considering only 8- to 10-month post-tamoxifen mice, there were still more surface tumors in zone 3 mice (mean: 10.3 versus 3.67; P = 0.0253) (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The fractional GS+ area showed a reduction of mutant clone abundance in zone 3 mice compared with zone 1 mice.
“The fractional GS+ area (GS+ area/total tissue area) also showed a reduction of mutant clone abundance in zone 3 mice compared with zone 1 mice (Fig. 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 5 months after tamoxifen, the zone 3 mutant mouse had 88% nonmutant, 0.62% Ctnnb1 single-mutant, 11% Arid2 single-mutant, and 0.69% double-mutant cells.
“In the zone 3 mutant mouse, there were 88% nonmutant, 0.62% Ctnnb1 singlemutant, 11% Arid2 single-mutant, and 0.69% double-mutant cells (Fig. 2, E and G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After 6 months, the GS+ mutant population decreased in size in zone 3 mutant mice.
“After 6 months, the Tomato+ population remained stable (fig. S5, A and B), whereas the GS+ mutant population decreased in size (Fig. 2C and fig. S5C), suggesting that WT cells from within zone 3 expanded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Blinded histologic analyses showed that 15 of 25 zone 3 mice (60%) and 2 of 16 zone 1 mice (12.5%) harbored malignant lesions, defined as dysplastic nodules, early HCC, or HCC.
“Blinded histologic analyses showed that 15 of 25 zone 3 mice (60%) and 2 of 16 zone 1 mice (12.5%) harbored malignant lesions, defined as dysplastic nodules, early HCC, or HCC (Fig. 3, E to H, and table S2; subcategories defined by the most common lesion type in the section).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In either zone, only 2 of all 58 (3.4%) Arid2 single mutant mice developed lesions by 14 months.
“In either zone, only 2 of all 58 (3.4%) Arid2 single mutant mice developed lesions by 14 months, indicating that Arid2 mutations alone were insufficient for carcinogenesis (Fig. 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Zone 3 livers harbored a much higher number of surface tumors than zone 1 livers (mean 9.62 versus 3.68; P = 0.0002).
“Also, zone 3 livers harbored a much higher number of surface tumors (mean: 9.62 versus 3.68; P = 0.0002) (Fig. 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In livers containing mutant hepatocytes, Ctnnb1/Arid2 mutant cells took on a zone 3 identity regardless of their location.
“In livers containing mutant hepatocytes, Ctnnb1/Arid2 mutant cells took on a zone 3 identity regardless of their location.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After a 10-day EdU pulse chase, there was an increased absolute number of proliferating hepatocytes in zone 1 mutant versus WT livers.
“After a 10-day 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) pulse chase, we observed an increased absolute number of proliferating hepatocytes in zone 1 mutant versus WT livers (fig. S4, A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After 6 months, the Tomato+ population remained stable in zone 3 mutant mice.
“After 6 months, the Tomato+ population remained stable (fig. S5, A and B), whereas the GS+ mutant population decreased in size (Fig. 2C and fig. S5C), suggesting that WT cells from within zone 3 expanded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
51/64 (80%) double-mutant mice with mutations in either zone developed cancers, usually in a multifocal pattern.
“In contrast, 51/64 (80%) double-mutant mice with mutations in either zone developed cancers, usually in a multifocal pattern (Fig. 3, A to C, and table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mutant clones in zone 3 appeared to have a hybrid pattern of expression that included zone 2 genes in addition to zone 3 genes.
“Mutant clones in zone 3 appeared to have a hybrid pattern of expression that included zone 2 genes in addition to zone 3 genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The relative GS+ area in zone 3 mutant livers decreased at 2 and 6 months.
“In contrast, the relative GS+ area in zone 3 mutant livers decreased at 2 and 6 months (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mutant clones in zone 1 appeared to have a hybrid pattern of expression that included zone 2 and 3 genes in addition to zone 1 genes.
“Mutant clones in zone 1 appeared to have a hybrid pattern of expression that included zone 2 and 3 genes in addition to zone 1 genes (fig. S3D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More Ki-67+ nuclei were observed in zone 1 mutant livers at the 6 month time point.
“In agreement with EdU tracing, we also observed more Ki-67+ nuclei in the zone 1 mutant livers at the 6 month time point (compare Fig. 2J and fig. S4, C and D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The frequency of GS+ mutant hepatocytes in zone 1 mutant mice was stable over time.
“The frequency of GS+ mutant hepatocytes in zone 1 mutant mice was stable over time (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Ctnnb1 heterozygous;Arid2 heterozygous model, zone 3 livers harbored a much higher number of surface tumors than zone 1 livers (mean 18.64 versus 0.94; P < 0.0001).
“In addition, zone 3 livers harbored a much higher number of surface tumors (mean: 18.64 versus 0.94; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The frequency of mutant hepatocytes in zone 3 mutant mice decreased over time.
“In contrast, the frequency of mutant hepatocytes in zone 3 mutant mice decreased over time (Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Expression of Glul and Cyp1a2 in mutant clones was higher than in zone 1 hepatocytes.
“In all cases, the expression of these genes was higher than in zone 1 hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among EdU+ hepatocytes in zone 1 mutant mice, a majority (65%) were also GS+ Ctnnb1 mutants.
“Among the EdU+ hepatocytes in zone 1 mutant mice, a majority (65%) were also GS+ Ctnnb1 mutants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Zone 1 mutant clones had higher expression of Ccnd1, Ccnb2, Cdk1, and Anln than did surrounding WT hepatocytes and zone 3 mutant clones.
“As for proliferation, zone 1 mutant clones had higher expression of Ccnd1, Ccnb2, Cdk1, and Anln than did surrounding WT hepatocytes and zone 3 mutant clones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In all examined mutant cells from ApoC4-CreERT2;Arid2fl/fl;Ctnnb1(ex3)fl/+ mice with nuclear and/or cytoplasmic CTNNB1, high GS staining was also observed.
“In all examined mutant cells from ApoC4-CreERT2;Arid2fl/fl; Ctnnb1(ex3)fl/+ mice, which had nuclear and/or cytoplasmic CTNNB1, high GS staining was also observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The relative GS+ cell area normalized to the 1-month time point in zone 1 mutant livers was largely unchanged over time, with the exception of an increase at 3 months.
“The relative GS+ cell area, normalized to the 1-month time point (set at 100% for each zonal mouse model), in the zone 1 mutant livers was largely unchanged over time, with the exception of an increase at 3 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the zone 3 mutant liver, GS+ hepatocytes were ectopically located in zones 2 and 3 but were farther from the CV than would be expected for a normal zone 3 hepatocyte.
“In the zone 3 mutant liver, GS+ hepatocytes were ectopically located in zones 2 and 3 but were farther from the CV than would be expected for a normal zone 3 hepatocyte (Fig. 2I).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No additive reductions in gross or microtumor burden were observed in the combination group of ethacrynic acid plus CRISPR-mediated Gstm3 deletion.
“No additive reductions in gross or microtumor burden in the combination group were observed, suggesting that ethacrynic acid was acting through GSTM3 (Fig. 5H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared with vehicle, ethacrynic acid resulted in a 75% reduction in microtumor area.
“Compared with vehicle, ethacrynic acid did not affect HDT efficiency (fig. S9A) but did result in a lower LW/BW and a 75% reduction in microtumor area (Fig. 5, B to D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ethacrynic acid led to increased peroxide levels compared with vehicle treatment.
“Ethacrynic acid led to increased peroxide levels compared with vehicle treatment, suggesting successful inhibition of GSTM activity (Fig. 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two doses of Gstm3 siRNA before CTNNB1/MYC HDT reduced LW/BW ratios and microtumor burden compared with nontargeting control siRNA.
“We gave two doses of Gstm3 siRNA before CTNNB1/MYC HDT, which reduced LW/BW ratios and microtumor burden compared with the nontargeting control siRNA (Fig. 4, M to O).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One week after introduction of oncogenes, sgGstm3 and sgGstm2 KO livers showed a decrease in the number and area of microscopic tumors.
“One week after the introduction of oncogenes, sgGstm3 and sgGstm2 knockout (KO) livers showed a clear decrease in the number and area of microscopic tumors, indicating a block in tumor initiation (Fig. 4, E and F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference in the total number of tumors between control and Gstm3 overexpression groups (6.2 versus 14.2 tumors per WT or overexpression liver, P = 0.1518).
“There was no significant difference in the total number of tumors between groups (6.2 versus 14.2 tumors per WT or overexpression liver, P = 0.1518) (fig. S8D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant increase in the mean number of Tomato+ HCCs originating from zone 1 in GSTM3 overexpression versus control (1.3 versus 8.7 HCC per mouse, P = 0.0453).
“There was a significant increase in the mean number of Tomato+ HCCs that originated from zone 1 (1.3 versus 8.7 HCC per mouse in control versus overexpression, P = 0.0453; Fig. 4S).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cre-driven Ctnnb1/Arid2 tumors were phenotypically and transcriptionally similar regardless of zone of origin.
“The fact that Cre-driven Ctnnb1/Arid2 tumors were phenotypically and transcriptionally similar regardless of zone of origin (Fig. 3P and fig. S6A) supported the idea that Gstm2/3 in hepatocytes, rather than in established tumors, was responsible for differences in tumor initiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared with vehicle, ethacrynic acid did not affect HDT efficiency.
“Compared with vehicle, ethacrynic acid did not affect HDT efficiency (fig. S9A) but did result in a lower LW/BW and a 75% reduction in microtumor area (Fig. 5, B to D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ethacrynic acid-treated WT FVB mice (2 days before and 2 days after HDT) showed decreased LW/BW five days after the last injection.
“Five days after the last injection, the ethacrynic acid–treated mice showed a decreased LW/BW, further supporting the observation that baseline levels of Gstm3 are important in initiation (Fig. 5F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ethacrynic acid prevented Ctnnb1-driven HCC initiation by increasing ferroptosis in premalignant cells.
“Genetic deletion of Gstm2 or Gstm3 impaired HCC initiation, and ethacrynic acid, a loop diuretic known to inhibit GSTM2 and GSTM3, also prevented Ctnnb1-driven HCC initiation by increasing ferroptosis in premalignant cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Ethacrynic acid inhibits GSTM2 and GSTM3.
- Findingown data
Five of seven murine Gstm family members had increased expression in zone 3 compared with zone 1.
“Examination of all seven murine Gstm family members showed that five had increased expression in zone 3 compared with zone 1, suggesting that Gstm2 and Gstm3 may be representatives of a family-wide effect (fig. S7F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Whole-body Gstm3 KO mice developed less CTNNB1/MYC tumors than WT mice.
“KO mice developed less CTNNB1/MYC tumors than did WT mice (Fig. 4, G and H, and fig. S7H), supporting the concept that Gstm3 within zone 3 hepatocytes was required for tumor initiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no difference in the mean number of Tomato− HCCs originating from zone 3 between control and GSTM3 overexpression (4.8 versus 5.5 HCC per mouse, P = 0.8765).
“As expected, there was no difference in the mean number of Tomato− HCCs that originate from zone 3 (4.8 versus 5.5 HCC per mouse in control versus overexpression, P = 0.8765; Fig. 4R).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Delivering both CTNNB1 and MYC led to carcinogenesis within 1 to 2 weeks on the FVB strain background.
“CTNNB1 or MYC alone was insufficient to drive cancer within 4 weeks (38), but delivering both led to carcinogenesis within 1 to 2 weeks on the FVB strain background.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Alternative liver cancer models, driven by either mutagens or other oncogenes, also arose in zone 3.
“Alternative liver cancer models, driven by either mutagens or other oncogenes, also arose in zone 3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In HCC53N, liproxstatin-1 abrogated RSL3-induced cell death.
“In HCC53N, ferroptosis induction with a small-molecule inhibitor of GPX4 (RSL3) killed cells, and the ferroptosis inhibitor liproxstatin-1 abrogated RSL3-induced cell death (Fig. 5I, left panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
- Findingown data
Tumors driven by NRAS/shp53 came primarily from zone 3.
“Similarly, tumors driven by NRAS/shp53 came primarily from zone 3, demonstrated by a higher proportion of Tomato+ tumors in the zone 3–labeled mice and Tomato− tumors in the zone 1–labeled mice (fig. S15, B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gls2-CreERT2 and Cyp1a2-CreERT2 lines specifically label zone 1 and zone 3 hepatocytes, respectively.
- Rests on an assumption: Tomato expression is a reliable lineage-tracing marker that persists in labeled hepatocytes and their progeny.
- Findingown data
Gstm3 deletion increased 4HNE in NRAS/shp53 context.
“Gstm3 deletion also increased 4HNE in this context (fig. S16B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fsp1 overexpression did not affect the CTNNB1/MYC model in the control setting.
“Fsp1 overexpression did not affect the CTNNB1/MYC model in the control setting but did eliminate the LW/BW suppressing effects of Gstm3 deletion (Fig. 5R).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Fsp1 overexpression does not have off-target effects that affect tumorigenesis.
- Findingown data
Other zone 3 genes promote tumorigenesis.
“We also identified other zone 3 genes that promote tumorigenesis, suggesting that GSTMs are not alone in their protumor functions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Liproxstatin-1 reversed ethacrynic acid-induced sensitization to RSL3-mediated cell death.
“This effect was reversed by liproxstatin-1, demonstrating that ethacrynic acid–induced sensitization to RSL3-mediated cell death acts through ferroptosis (Fig. 5I, right panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
- Findingown data
Transient knockdown with a single dose of siRNA before HDT reduced LW/BW ratios.
“Gstm3 deletion increased survival in NRAS/shp53 mice (fig. S15D), and transient knockdown with a single dose of siRNA before HDT reduced LW/BW ratios (fig. S15E), indicating that basal Gstm3 expression in zone 3 hepatocytes is necessary for NRAS/shp53-driven HCC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NRAS/shp53 livers showed decreased GSH/GSSG ratios in mice receiving sgGstm3 or sgNrf2.
“Additionally, NRAS/shp53 livers showed decreased GSH/GSSG ratios in mice receiving sgGstm3 or sgNrf2, indicating that loss of Gstm3 increases oxidative stress (fig. S16A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gstm2 KO HCC53N and HCC53M cells did not show significantly increased sensitivity to ferroptosis.
“Gstm2 KO HCC53N and HCC53M cells did not show significantly increased sensitivity to ferroptosis (fig. S13, A and B, and Fig. 5N).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell death in Gstm3 KO HCC53N cells was reversed by liproxstatin-1.
“As expected, RSL3 caused more cell death in KO cells than in WT cells (Fig. 5J), and cell death was reversed by liproxstatin-1 (fig. S10B and Fig. 5K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
- Findingown data
GSH was reduced after ethacrynic acid treatment.
“GSH was increased after Gstm3 overexpression (fig. S12A); GSH was reduced after ethacrynic acid treatment and after Gstm3 deletion (fig. S12B), collectively indicating that this is one mechanism by which ferroptosis occurs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: GSH is a critical cofactor for GPX4-mediated protection against ferroptosis.
- Findingown data
Gstm3 deletion led to an increase in hepatocyte cell death measured by TUNEL.
“Concurrently, Gstm3 deletion led to an increase in hepatocyte cell death measured by TUNEL (fig. S9D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GSH was increased after Gstm3 overexpression.
“GSH was increased after Gstm3 overexpression (fig. S12A); GSH was reduced after ethacrynic acid treatment and after Gstm3 deletion (fig. S12B), collectively indicating that this is one mechanism by which ferroptosis occurs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: GSH is a critical cofactor for GPX4-mediated protection against ferroptosis.
- Findingown data
Tumors caused by DEN came primarily from zone 3.
“Indeed, we found that tumors caused by DEN came primarily from zone 3 (fig. S15A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gls2-CreERT2 and Cyp1a2-CreERT2 lines specifically label zone 1 and zone 3 hepatocytes, respectively.
- Rests on an assumption: Tomato expression is a reliable lineage-tracing marker that persists in labeled hepatocytes and their progeny.
- Findingown data
Ethacrynic acid had a stronger suppressive effect on GSH than Gstm3 deletion.
“However, ethacrynic acid had a stronger suppressive effect on GSH than Gstm3 deletion (fig. S12B), suggesting that other GSTs or GSH regulators might be inhibited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ethacrynic acid sensitized HCC53N cells to ferroptosis.
“Consistent with an antiferroptotic role for GSTM3, ethacrynic acid sensitized cells to ferroptosis (Fig. 5I, middle panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
- Findingown data
In all cell lines, ethacrynic acid promoted RSL3-induced cell death to a greater degree in WT cells than in Gstm3 KO cells.
“In all cell lines, ethacrynic acid promoted RSL3-induced cell death to a greater degree in WT cells than in Gstm3 KO cells (Fig. 5, J and N, and fig. S11, A to D), and similarly, ethacrynic acid abrogated the protective effects of overexpression (fig. S11E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In sgGstm3-treated livers, superoxide and peroxide levels were increased.
“In sgGstm3-treated livers, superoxide and peroxide levels were increased, suggesting increased oxidative stress (fig. S9, B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fsp1 overexpression eliminated the LW/BW suppressing effects of Gstm3 deletion.
“Fsp1 overexpression did not affect the CTNNB1/MYC model in the control setting but did eliminate the LW/BW suppressing effects of Gstm3 deletion (Fig. 5R).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Fsp1 overexpression does not have off-target effects that affect tumorigenesis.
- Findingown data
Mutant clones in different locations in the liver lobule have divergent fates.
“Perhaps the most unexpected result was that mutant clones in different locations in the liver lobule have divergent fates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gstm3 was sufficient to protect against RSL-induced ferroptosis.
“Gain-of-function experiments showed that Gstm3 was sufficient to protect against RSL-induced ferroptosis (fig. S10, A and B, and Fig. 5, L and M).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
- Findingown data
In livers injected with CTNNB1/MYC, Gstm3 deletion resulted in increased 4HNE.
“In livers injected with CTNNB1/MYC, Gstm3 deletion resulted in increased 4HNE (fig. S14A), supporting a role for GSTM3 in regulating lipid peroxidation in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GSH was reduced after Gstm3 deletion.
“GSH was increased after Gstm3 overexpression (fig. S12A); GSH was reduced after ethacrynic acid treatment and after Gstm3 deletion (fig. S12B), collectively indicating that this is one mechanism by which ferroptosis occurs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: GSH is a critical cofactor for GPX4-mediated protection against ferroptosis.
- Findingown data
Mice with zone 3 mutations developed HCC more frequently than those with zone 1 mutations.
“Notably, mice with zone 3 mutations developed HCC more frequently than those with zone 1 mutations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ethacrynic acid increased lipid peroxidation in cells treated with RSL3.
“Furthermore, ethacrynic acid increased lipid peroxidation in cells treated with RSL3 (fig. S9E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gstm3 deletion increased survival in NRAS/shp53 mice.
“Gstm3 deletion increased survival in NRAS/shp53 mice (fig. S15D), and transient knockdown with a single dose of siRNA before HDT reduced LW/BW ratios (fig. S15E), indicating that basal Gstm3 expression in zone 3 hepatocytes is necessary for NRAS/shp53-driven HCC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
DKO induced a stronger ferroptotic response than either single KO.
“DKO induced a stronger ferroptotic response than either single KO, indicating that Gstm2 and Gstm3 both inhibit ferroptosis (Fig. 5N).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fsp1 overexpression rescued tumor initiation when Gstm3 was deleted.
“As indicated by microtumor quantification, Fsp1 overexpression rescued tumor initiation when Gstm3 was deleted (Fig. 5, S and T).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Fsp1 overexpression does not have off-target effects that affect tumorigenesis.
- Findingown data
RSL3 caused more cell death in Gstm3 KO HCC53N cells than in WT cells.
“As expected, RSL3 caused more cell death in KO cells than in WT cells (Fig. 5J), and cell death was reversed by liproxstatin-1 (fig. S10B and Fig. 5K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
- Findingown data
Ethacrynic acid abrogated the protective effects of Gstm3 overexpression.
“In all cell lines, ethacrynic acid promoted RSL3-induced cell death to a greater degree in WT cells than in Gstm3 KO cells (Fig. 5, J and N, and fig. S11, A to D), and similarly, ethacrynic acid abrogated the protective effects of overexpression (fig. S11E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In HCC53N, ferroptosis induction with RSL3 killed cells.
“In HCC53N, ferroptosis induction with a small-molecule inhibitor of GPX4 (RSL3) killed cells, and the ferroptosis inhibitor liproxstatin-1 abrogated RSL3-induced cell death (Fig. 5I, left panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
- Interpretationown data
Arid2 mutations alone were insufficient for carcinogenesis.
“In either zone, only 2 of all 58 (3.4%) Arid2 single mutant mice developed lesions by 14 months, indicating that Arid2 mutations alone were insufficient for carcinogenesis (Fig. 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In zone 1 mutant mice, Tomato reporter expression confirmed that CreER recombination was restricted to hepatocytes around portal triads.
“In zone 1 mutant mice, Tomato reporter expression confirmed that CreER recombination was restricted to hepatocytes around portal triads (PTs) (Fig. 1G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Co-mutating Ctnnb1 and Arid2 resulted in frequent liver tumor formation.
“As predicted by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (Fig. 1A), co-mutating Ctnnb1 and Arid2 resulted in frequent liver tumor formation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In zone 1, mutant GS+ hepatocytes were more competitive than WT hepatocytes owing to increased proliferation.
“These data suggested that in zone 1, mutant GS+ hepatocytes were more competitive than WT hepatocytes owing to increased proliferation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The relative fitness of mutant hepatocytes before cancer development depended on the zone of origin.
“Taken together, the relative fitness of mutant hepatocytes before cancer development depended on the zone of origin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In zone 3 mutant mice, Tomato expression centered around central veins and extended into zone 2.
“In zone 3 mutant mice, Tomato expression centered around CVs and extended into zone 2 (Fig. 1H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The degree of premalignant clone expansion in different zones did not predict tumorigenic potential.
“The above results showed that (i) the degree of premalignant clone expansion in different zones did not predict tumorigenic potential and (ii) the lack of profound gene expression differences in tumors from distinct zones suggested that, once established, the tumors were phenotypically similar and may not have revealed the differences that originally influenced tumor emergence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Ectopic GS expression allowed lineage tracing of Ctnnb1 mutant hepatocytes.
“Thus, ectopic GS expression allowed us to lineage trace Ctnnb1 mutant hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Tumors from both zone 1 and zone 3 groups stained strongly for GS, showing that these tumors were driven by oncogenic CTNNB1.
“Tumors from both groups stained strongly for GS, showing that these tumors were driven by oncogenic CTNNB1 (Fig. 3, I and J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
WT cells from within zone 3 expanded.
“After 6 months, the Tomato+ population remained stable (fig. S5, A and B), whereas the GS+ mutant population decreased in size (Fig. 2C and fig. S5C), suggesting that WT cells from within zone 3 expanded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Serial staining for CTNNB1 and GS supported a 1:1 relationship between Ctnnb1 activation and ectopic GS expression.
“Serial staining for CTNNB1 and GS supported a 1:1 relationship between Ctnnb1 activation and ectopic GS expression (fig. S1, B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Gstm3 overexpression was associated with a shift in tumor origin from zone 3 to zone 1 (chi-square P = 0.000059).
“This indicated that Gstm3 overexpression was associated with a shift in tumor origin from zone 3 to zone 1 (chi-square analysis, P = 0.000059).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Baseline levels of Gstm3 are important in initiation.
“Five days after the last injection, the ethacrynic acid–treated mice showed a decreased LW/BW, further supporting the observation that baseline levels of Gstm3 are important in initiation (Fig. 5F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Gstm2/3 in hepatocytes, rather than in established tumors, was responsible for differences in tumor initiation.
“The fact that Cre-driven Ctnnb1/Arid2 tumors were phenotypically and transcriptionally similar regardless of zone of origin (Fig. 3P and fig. S6A) supported the idea that Gstm2/3 in hepatocytes, rather than in established tumors, was responsible for differences in tumor initiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Expression of GSTM3 in zone 1 was sufficient to shift the zone of origin from zone 3 to zone 1.
“These data indicated that the expression of GSTM3 in zone 1 was sufficient to shift the zone of origin from zone 3 to zone 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gls2-CreERT2 and Cyp1a2-CreERT2 lines specifically label zone 1 and zone 3 hepatocytes, respectively.
- Rests on an assumption: Tomato expression is a reliable lineage-tracing marker that persists in labeled hepatocytes and their progeny.
- Interpretationown data
Ethacrynic acid was acting through GSTM3.
“No additive reductions in gross or microtumor burden in the combination group were observed, suggesting that ethacrynic acid was acting through GSTM3 (Fig. 5H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Gstm2 and Gstm3 may be representatives of a family-wide effect.
“Examination of all seven murine Gstm family members showed that five had increased expression in zone 3 compared with zone 1, suggesting that Gstm2 and Gstm3 may be representatives of a family-wide effect (fig. S7F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These findings reveal how spatial context shapes tumor development.
“These findings reveal how spatial context shapes tumor development and highlight ferroptosis regulation as a potential target for liver cancer prevention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Reductions of the targeted mRNAs and proteins were observed in the normal liver as well as in isolated liver tumors.
“Reductions of the targeted mRNAs and proteins were observed in the normal liver as well as in isolated liver tumors (fig. S7, A to D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Zonation influences the clonal dynamics and transformation potential of premalignant cells in the liver.
“Zonation influences the clonal dynamics and transformation potential of premalignant cells in the liver.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Lineage tracing with Tomato allowed determination of the zone of origin.
“Lineage tracing with Tomato allowed us to determine the zone of origin (Fig. 4, P and Q).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Different levels of Gstm3 in hepatocytes before transformation could influence the initiation of HCCs.
“These results showed that different levels of Gstm3 in hepatocytes before transformation could influence the initiation of HCCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In Gls2-CreER;RosaLSL-tdTomato control and Gls2-CreER;RosaLSL-tdTomato;RosaLSL-Gstm3-V5 mice, tamoxifen-induced Tomato and/or GSTM3-V5 expression was restricted to zone 1.
“In Gls2-CreER;RosaLSL-tdTomato (control) and Gls2-CreER; RosaLSL-tdTomato;RosaLSL-Gstm3-V5 mice, tamoxifen-induced Tomato and/ or GSTM3-V5 expression was restricted to zone 1 (fig. S8B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Increased peroxide levels suggest successful inhibition of GSTM activity.
“Ethacrynic acid led to increased peroxide levels compared with vehicle treatment, suggesting successful inhibition of GSTM activity (Fig. 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Gstm3 and Gstm2 deletion blocks tumor initiation.
“One week after the introduction of oncogenes, sgGstm3 and sgGstm2 knockout (KO) livers showed a clear decrease in the number and area of microscopic tumors, indicating a block in tumor initiation (Fig. 4, E and F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Gstm3 within zone 3 hepatocytes was required for tumor initiation.
“KO mice developed less CTNNB1/MYC tumors than did WT mice (Fig. 4, G and H, and fig. S7H), supporting the concept that Gstm3 within zone 3 hepatocytes was required for tumor initiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Chemical inhibition of GSTMs recapitulated the HCC inhibitory effects of Gstm3 deletion.
“Therefore, chemical inhibition of GSTMs recapitulated the HCC inhibitory effects of Gstm3 deletion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
GSTM2/3, antioxidant phase II detoxification enzymes that perform glutathione conjugation of xenobiotics, are contributors to increased zone 3 transformation in part by inhibiting ferroptosis.
“GSTM2/3, antioxidant phase II detoxification enzymes that perform glutathione conjugation of xenobiotics, are contributors to increased zone 3 transformation in part by inhibiting ferroptosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
As a consequence of oxidative stress, mutations may accumulate more frequently in cells within zone 3.
“As a consequence of oxidative stress, mutations may accumulate more frequently in cells within zone 3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The existence of antioxidant and antiferroptotic mechanisms in zone 3, including GST-related enzymes, allows these enzymes to be co-opted for tumor cell survival.
“However, the existence of antioxidant and antiferroptotic mechanisms in zone 3, including GST-related enzymes, allows these enzymes to be co-opted for tumor cell survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Basal Gstm3 expression in zone 3 hepatocytes is necessary for NRAS/shp53-driven HCC.
“Gstm3 deletion increased survival in NRAS/shp53 mice (fig. S15D), and transient knockdown with a single dose of siRNA before HDT reduced LW/BW ratios (fig. S15E), indicating that basal Gstm3 expression in zone 3 hepatocytes is necessary for NRAS/shp53-driven HCC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Gstm3 is more highly expressed in zone 3 than in zone 1.
- Study design and conductown data
Fsp1 overexpression was confirmed on the mRNA and protein levels.
“Fsp1 overexpression was confirmed on the mRNA and protein levels (fig. S14, B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Loss of Gstm3 increases oxidative stress.
“Additionally, NRAS/shp53 livers showed decreased GSH/GSSG ratios in mice receiving sgGstm3 or sgNrf2, indicating that loss of Gstm3 increases oxidative stress (fig. S16A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ethacrynic acid-induced sensitization to RSL3-mediated cell death acts through ferroptosis.
“This effect was reversed by liproxstatin-1, demonstrating that ethacrynic acid–induced sensitization to RSL3-mediated cell death acts through ferroptosis (Fig. 5I, right panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
- Interpretationreasoning
Clone expansion immediately after establishment of truncal Ctnnb1 mutations is unlikely to be a feature of hepatic premalignancy.
“Clone expansion immediately after establishment of truncal Ctnnb1 mutations is unlikely to be a feature of hepatic premalignancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
GSTMs are not alone in their protumor functions.
“We also identified other zone 3 genes that promote tumorigenesis, suggesting that GSTMs are not alone in their protumor functions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
This is one mechanism by which ferroptosis occurs.
“GSH was increased after Gstm3 overexpression (fig. S12A); GSH was reduced after ethacrynic acid treatment and after Gstm3 deletion (fig. S12B), collectively indicating that this is one mechanism by which ferroptosis occurs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: GSH is a critical cofactor for GPX4-mediated protection against ferroptosis.
- Interpretationown data
GSTM3 promotes tumorigenesis in zone 3-biased models of HCC.
“Consistent with our prediction, these data suggest that GSTM3 promotes tumorigenesis in zone 3–biased models of HCC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Gstm3 is more highly expressed in zone 3 than in zone 1.
- Interpretationown data
Increased superoxide and peroxide levels in sgGstm3-treated livers suggest increased oxidative stress.
“In sgGstm3-treated livers, superoxide and peroxide levels were increased, suggesting increased oxidative stress (fig. S9, B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
One mechanism by which GSTM3 promotes tumorigenesis in zone 3 is through ferroptosis inhibition in premalignant hepatocytes.
“Thus, one mechanism by which GSTM3 promotes tumorigenesis in zone 3 is through ferroptosis inhibition in premalignant hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
- Rests on an assumption: GSH is a critical cofactor for GPX4-mediated protection against ferroptosis.
- Rests on an assumption: Fsp1 overexpression does not have off-target effects that affect tumorigenesis.
- Interpretationown data
The existence of a zonal bias was not specific to HCCs driven by Ctnnb1/Arid2 but may be a more general phenomenon.
“These data suggested that the existence of a zonal bias was not specific to HCCs driven by Ctnnb1/Arid2 but rather may be a more general phenomenon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gls2-CreERT2 and Cyp1a2-CreERT2 lines specifically label zone 1 and zone 3 hepatocytes, respectively.
- Rests on an assumption: Tomato expression is a reliable lineage-tracing marker that persists in labeled hepatocytes and their progeny.
- Interpretationown data
GSTM3 regulates lipid peroxidation in vivo.
“In livers injected with CTNNB1/MYC, Gstm3 deletion resulted in increased 4HNE (fig. S14A), supporting a role for GSTM3 in regulating lipid peroxidation in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Other GSTs or GSH regulators might be inhibited by ethacrynic acid.
“However, ethacrynic acid had a stronger suppressive effect on GSH than Gstm3 deletion (fig. S12B), suggesting that other GSTs or GSH regulators might be inhibited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The degree of clonal expansion of mutant hepatocytes did not necessarily predict their tumorigenic potential.
“Overall, our study demonstrated that the degree of clonal expansion of mutant hepatocytes did not necessarily predict their tumorigenic potential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 48
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn zone 3, there is a well-known histologic pattern of liver damage in diseases that culminate in HCC, and zone 3 is frequently associated with oxidative stress.
“In zone 3, there is a well-known histologic pattern of liver damage in diseases that culminate in HCC (61, 62), and zone 3 is frequently associated with oxidative stress (63, 64).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [61] Steinman JB, Salomao MA, Pajvani UB, Zonation in NASH - A key paradigm for understanding pathophysiology and clinical outcomes. Liver Int. 41, 2534– 2546 (2021). doi: 10.1111/liv.15025 34328687 source
The Figure 2 caption shows a pericentral histologic pattern of NASH, but the copy does not link that pattern to HCC. More decisively, §4.2.1 (Vitamin E) places the highest oxidative stress in the periportal region, not zone 3; §4.3 likewise describes greater oxidative stress in the periportal area. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [62] Annunziato S, Sun T, Tchorz JS, The RSPO-LGR4/5-ZNRF3/RNF43 module in liver homeostasis, regeneration, and disease. Hepatology 76, 888– 899 (2022). doi: 10.1002/hep.32328 35006616 source
- cites [63] Kietzmann T, Liver zonation in health and disease: Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible transcription factors as concert masters. Int. J. Mol. Sci 20, 2347 (2019). doi: 10.3390/ijms20092347 31083568 PMC6540308 source
Section 2 identifies zone 3 as the perivenous zone, and Section 9.1 says hepatocellular injury in NASH is mainly perivenous and discusses ROS-mediated lipid oxidation in disease progression. Section 10 links NAFLD and ALD to progression toward HCC. The paper does not establish a general histologic pattern across diseases that culminate in HCC or state that zone 3 is frequently associated with oxidative stress. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [64] Cappel DA, Pyruvate-carboxylase-mediated anaplerosis promotes antioxidant capacity by sustaining TCA cycle and redox metabolism in liver. Cell Metab. 29, 1291– 1305.e8 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.03.014 31006591 PMC6585968 source
The Results section reports increased oxidative stress in the livers of high-fat-diet-fed mice lacking hepatic pyruvate carboxylase, but does not locate it in zone 3. Searches for “zone 3 oxidative stress” and “pericentral centrilobular zonation oxidative stress” found no passage addressing whether zone 3 is frequently associated with oxidative stress. The histologic-damage clause is attached to other citations. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChronic liver injury from viruses, alcohol, or overnutrition leads to cell death, regeneration, inflammation, fibrosis, and ultimately hepatocellular carcinoma.
“In the liver, chronic injury from viruses, alcohol, or overnutrition leads to cell death, regeneration, inflammation, fibrosis, and ultimately hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (5, 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] Schuppan D, Afdhal NH, Liver cirrhosis. Lancet 371, 838– 851 (2008). doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60383-9 18328931 PMC2271178 source
The Introduction identifies viral hepatitis, alcohol-related disease, and obesity-associated NASH as causes or risk factors for cirrhosis. Its fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma passages describe fibrogenesis after chronic injury, regenerative nodules, and cirrhosis as a major risk factor for HCC. They do not establish the claimed sequence beginning with cell death or imply that chronic injury inevitably ends in HCC. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [6] Diehl AM, Day C, Cause, pathogenesis, and treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med 377, 2063– 2072 (2017). doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1503519 29166236 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany murine liver cancer models enforce oncogene or tumor suppressor perturbations in all hepatocytes or use mutagens that humans are rarely exposed to.
“Because many murine liver cancer models enforce oncogene or tumor suppressor perturbations in all hepatocytes or use mutagens that humans are rarely exposed to (20, 21), one cannot solely depend on these models to identify the cell of origin or to track the evolution of HCCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] Shachaf CM MYC inactivation uncovers pluripotent differentiation and tumour dormancy in hepatocellular cancer. Nature 431, 1112– 1117 (2004). doi: 10.1038/nature03043 15475948 source
- cites [21] Chung AS Immune checkpoint inhibition is safe and effective for liver cancer prevention in a mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 13, 911– 922 (2020). doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0200 32839204 PMC8284815 source
The Discussion (page not available) says that commonly used mouse models rely on tumor-suppressor deletion or oncogene activation, while the Results describe a model using DEN to induce mutagenesis. The paper does not say that the genetic perturbations occur in all hepatocytes or that humans are rarely exposed to the mutagens used. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAfter decades of injury, cirrhotic livers consist of millions of nodules, most of which harbor somatic mutations.
“After decades of injury, cirrhotic livers consist of millions of nodules, most of which harbor somatic mutations (7–9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Zhu M Somatic mutations increase hepatic clonal fitness and regeneration in chronic liver disease. Cell 177, 608– 621.e12 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.026 30955891 PMC6519461 source
The Introduction (page not available) identifies regenerative nodules as a defining feature of cirrhosis, and the Discussion says decades of liver damage can lead to cirrhosis and that mutations in cirrhosis are common. The paper does not state that a cirrhotic liver contains millions of nodules or establish that most nodules harbor somatic mutations; the Results say the authors could not assign mutations to individual nodules. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [8] Brunner SF Somatic mutations and clonal dynamics in healthy and cirrhotic human liver. Nature 574, 538– 542 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1670-9 31645727 PMC6837891 source
The paper’s Abstract (page unavailable) reports somatic mutations in cirrhotic liver and describes mutated clones within nodules separated by fibrotic bands. It does not establish that cirrhotic livers contain millions of nodules, that most nodules harbor mutations, or a specific duration of decades of injury. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] Ng SWK Convergent somatic mutations in metabolism genes in chronic liver disease. Nature 598, 473– 478 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03974-6; 34646017 source
No passage from our copy addresses whether cirrhotic livers contain millions of nodules or whether most nodules harbor somatic mutations. Searches for nodules, millions, cirrhosis, and somatic mutations found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCTNNB1 is among the most frequently mutated genes in HCC, with mutation frequencies TERT promoter 44%, TP53 31%, and CTNNB1 27%.
“We focused on CTNNB1 because it is among the most frequently mutated genes in HCC [mutation frequency: TERT promoter (44%), TP53 (31%), CTNNB1 (27%)] (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Comprehensive and integrative genomic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 169, 1327– 1341.e23 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046 28622513 PMC5680778 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCyp1a2-CreER mice recombine loci in zones 2 and 3, but more frequently in zone 3.
“Cyp1a2-CreER mice recombine loci in zones 2 and 3, but more frequently in zone 3 (18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Wei Y Liver homeostasis is maintained by midlobular zone 2 hepatocytes. Science 371, eabb1625 (2021). doi: 10.1126/science.abb1625 33632817 PMC8496420 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationARID2 is a tumor suppressor and a component of the PBAF complex within the SWI/SNF family of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling genes.
“ARID2, a tumor suppressor, is a component of the PBAF complex within the SWI/SNF family of adenosine triphosphate–dependent chromatin remodeling genes (27).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Duan Y Chromatin remodeling gene ARID2 targets cyclin D1 and cyclin E1 to suppress hepatoma cell progression. Oncotarget 7, 45863– 45875 (2016). doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10244 27351279 PMC5216766 source
The Introduction identifies ARID2 as a tumor-suppressor component of the SWI/SNF complexes and says those complexes mediate ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Our copy does not identify ARID2 specifically as a component of the PBAF complex (searched: PBAF), so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome GST family members have been shown to inhibit ferroptosis in lung, pancreatic, and gastric cancers.
“Some GST family members have been shown to inhibit ferroptosis in lung, pancreatic, and gastric cancers (57–59).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [57] Tan X, Targeting GSTP1-dependent ferroptosis in lung cancer radiotherapy: Existing evidence and future directions. Front. Mol. Biosci 9, 1102158 (2022). doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1102158 36589232 PMC9800622 source
The Perspective (page unavailable) reports that GSTM1 inhibits ferroptosis in brain metastases from lung cancer. It presents GSTP1’s role in lung cancer as a hypothesis, however, and the passages addressing pancreatic and gastric cancer do not establish GST-mediated inhibition of ferroptosis in either. Thus the source supports the lung-cancer portion, but not the full three-cancer claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [58] Kuang F, Liu J, Xie Y, Tang D, Kang R, MGST1 is a redox-sensitive repressor of ferroptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Cell Chem. Biol 28, 765– 775.e5 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.01.006 33539732 source
- cites [59] Zhang W, SMURF2 predisposes cancer cell toward ferroptosis in GPX4-independent manners by promoting GSTP1 degradation. Mol. Cell 83, 4352– 4369.e8 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.10.042 38016474 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEthacrynic acid is a loop diuretic that inhibits GSTM-subfamily proteins, in part by acting as an alternative substrate for glutathione conjugation.
“Ethacrynic acid is a loop diuretic that inhibits GSTM-subfamily proteins, in part by acting as an alternative substrate for glutathione conjugation (47, 48).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] Ploemen JH, van Ommen B, Bogaards JJ, van Bladeren PJ, Ethacrynic acid and its glutathione conjugate as inhibitors of glutathione S-transferases. Xenobiotica 23, 913– 923 (1993). doi: 10.3109/00498259309059418 8284946 source
- cites [48] Allocati N, Masulli M, Di Ilio C, Federici L, Glutathione transferases: Substrates, inihibitors and pro-drugs in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Oncogenesis 7, 8 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41389-017-0025-3 29362397 PMC5833873 source
The “Ethacrynic acid and analogues” section describes ethacrynic acid as a diuretic and a substrate/inhibitor of several GSTs; its Fig. 5 caption shows GST-catalyzed conjugation of ethacrynic acid. The copy does not identify it as a loop diuretic or specify GSTM-subfamily inhibition, instead naming GSTP1-1 as an inhibitory target. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGlul deletion was previously shown to increase HCC, validating the HDT approach.
“Glul deletion was previously shown to increase HCC, further validating this HDT approach (39).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Dai W, Glutamine synthetase limits β-catenin-mutated liver cancer growth by maintaining nitrogen homeostasis and suppressing mTORC1. J. Clin. Invest 132, e161408 (2022). doi: 10.1172/JCI161408 36256480 PMC9754002 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCdk1 or Pten were used as controls with predictable influences on cancer.
“Cdk1 or Pten were used as controls with predictable influences on cancer (36, 37).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] Diril MK, Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is essential for cell division and suppression of DNA re-replication but not for liver regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 109, 3826– 3831 (2012). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115201109 22355113 PMC3309725 source
- cites [37] Xue W, CRISPR-mediated direct mutation of cancer genes in the mouse liver. Nature 514, 380– 384 (2014). doi: 10.1038/nature13589 25119044 PMC4199937 source
The paper’s study description (section labeled Abstract; no page given) identifies Pten as a tumor-suppressor target and reports that its CRISPR-mediated mutation produced effects resembling known Pten deletion. It does not describe Pten as a control: sgGFP served as the control, while Pten-knockout mice provided a comparison. The cited paper does not address Cdk1. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAn in vivo Keap1 siRNA positive control led to increased LW/BW ratios and microtumor burden.
“An in vivo Keap1 siRNA, used as a positive control known to increase HCC through up-regulation of NRF2 (46), led to increased LW/BW ratios and microtumor burden (Fig. 4, M to O).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Tao J, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 and β-catenin coactivation in hepatocellular cancer: Biological and therapeutic implications. Hepatology 74, 741– 759 (2021). doi: 10.1002/hep.31730 33529367 PMC8326305 source
The Results section links KEAP1 loss of function to NRF2 activation, and the Discussion reports HCC development when mutant NRF2 and β-catenin were co-expressed. But the Discussion explicitly says KEAP1 silencing was not directly tested. The cited paper therefore supports the rationale for the positive control, not an established effect of Keap1 siRNA; the LW/BW and microtumor results are attributed to the citing paper’s Figure 4. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGSTMs are glutathione S-transferase family members within the mu subfamily that are activated upon WNT and NRF2 signaling.
“GSTMs are glutathione S-transferase family members within the mu subfamily that are activated upon WNT and NRF2 signaling (40–43).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [40] Chanas SA, Loss of the Nrf2 transcription factor causes a marked reduction in constitutive and inducible expression of the glutathione S-transferase Gsta1, Gsta2, Gstm1, Gstm2, Gstm3 and Gstm4 genes in the livers of male and female mice. Biochem. J 365, 405– 416 (2002). doi: 10.1042/bj20020320 11991805 PMC1222698 source
The paper (pp. 405–416) identifies Gstm genes as Mu-class glutathione S-transferases and reports that their expression in mouse liver is reduced when Nrf2 is absent. It does not address activation by WNT signaling, so that part of the citing sentence is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [41] Giera S, Wnt/β-catenin signaling activates and determines hepatic zonal expression of glutathione S-transferases in mouse liver. Toxicol. Sci 115, 22– 33 (2010). doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq033 20118494 source
- cites [42] Tan X, β-catenin deletion in hepatoblasts disrupts hepatic morphogenesis and survival during mouse development. Hepatology 47, 1667– 1679 (2008). doi: 10.1002/hep.22225 18393386 PMC4449338 source
The Results report that GST-mu1 expression decreased in β-catenin-deficient fetal mouse livers, supporting an association with Wnt/β-catenin signaling in that setting. The paper does not establish that Wnt directly activates GSTMs, and the passages found do not address NRF2 signaling. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [43] Balogun O, Loss of β-catenin reveals a role for glutathione in regulating oxidative stress during cholestatic liver disease. Hepatol. Commun 8, e0485 (2024). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000485 38967587 PMC11227358 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationClusters were annotated by zone and cell type using known marker genes, including markers for hepatic zones, bile duct cells, Kupffer cells, endothelial cells, hepatic stellate cells, and lymphocytes.
“To annotate clusters by zone and cell type, known marker genes were used (18), including markers for hepatic zones (zone-specific genes), bile duct cells, Kupffer cells, endothelial cells, hepatic stellate cells, and lymphocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Wei Y Liver homeostasis is maintained by midlobular zone 2 hepatocytes. Science 371, eabb1625 (2021). doi: 10.1126/science.abb1625 33632817 PMC8496420 source
In “Zone 2 proliferation is driven by the IGFBP2-mTOR-CCND1 axis” (page unavailable), the paper describes clustering hepatocytes by zone and identifies zone-specific genes. The available passages do not describe using marker genes to annotate clusters of bile duct, Kupffer, endothelial, hepatic stellate, or lymphocyte cells. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCTNNB1 transcriptionally activates NRF2, which in turn transcriptionally activates GSTMs.
“Because CTNNB1 transcriptionally activates NRF2, which in turn transcriptionally activates GSTMs (40), antioxidant functions might be central to GSTM-induced carcinogenesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Chanas SA, Loss of the Nrf2 transcription factor causes a marked reduction in constitutive and inducible expression of the glutathione S-transferase Gsta1, Gsta2, Gstm1, Gstm2, Gstm3 and Gstm4 genes in the livers of male and female mice. Biochem. J 365, 405– 416 (2002). doi: 10.1042/bj20020320 11991805 PMC1222698 source
The paper’s opening summary reports that Nrf2 knockout reduces hepatic Gstm gene expression and attenuates induction of transferase mRNA, supporting the Nrf2-to-GSTM part of the claim. The passages do not address CTNNB1 or show that it transcriptionally activates NRF2; the paper’s results also establish an effect on GSTM expression rather than direct transcriptional activation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFSP1 resides in the plasma membrane, where it uses NADH or NADPH to reduce ubiquinone to ubiquinol, which subsequently quenches lipid radicals that drive ferroptosis.
“FSP1 resides in the plasma membrane, where it uses NADH or NADPH to reduce ubiquinone to ubiquinol, which subsequently quenches lipid radicals that drive ferroptosis (60).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Doll S, FSP1 is a glutathione-independent ferroptosis suppressor. Nature 575, 693– 698 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1707-0 31634899 source
The Abstract states that FSP1 uses NAD(P)H to regenerate ubiquinol, which traps lipid peroxyl radicals. But the N-myristoylation section (page unavailable) reports FSP1-GFP at a perinuclear membrane compartment with partial ER and Golgi overlap; it refers to another study for the role of plasma membrane-targeted FSP1. Thus, this paper does not establish the unqualified claim that FSP1 resides in the plasma membrane. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSomatic mutations are common in nonmalignant liver tissues, but mutations in cancer drivers are observed less frequently than anticipated.
“Somatic mutations are common in nonmalignant liver tissues, but mutations in cancer drivers are observed less frequently than anticipated (7–9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Zhu M Somatic mutations increase hepatic clonal fitness and regeneration in chronic liver disease. Cell 177, 608– 621.e12 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.026 30955891 PMC6519461 source
- cites [8] Brunner SF Somatic mutations and clonal dynamics in healthy and cirrhotic human liver. Nature 574, 538– 542 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1670-9 31645727 PMC6837891 source
- cites [9] Ng SWK Convergent somatic mutations in metabolism genes in chronic liver disease. Nature 598, 473– 478 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03974-6; 34646017 source
The supplied passage is bibliographic metadata (no section or page), not study text. Searches for cancer-driver mutations and somatic mutations in nonmalignant liver tissue returned no substantive passage, so our available copy does not establish either part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGS image analysis and single nuclear genotyping were concordant and showed a greater decline and reduced absolute number of mutant clones in zone 3 compared with zone 1.
“Thus, GS image analysis and single nuclear genotyping were concordant and showed a greater decline and reduced absolute number of mutant clones in zone 3 compared with zone 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 8-month post-tamoxifen mice with gross tumors, the background livers of zone 1 mice showed maintenance of GS+ mutant clones, whereas zone 3 mice had almost no ectopic GS+ clones, despite increased tumor burden.
“In 8-month post-tamoxifen mice with gross tumors, the background livers of zone 1 mice showed the maintenance of GS+ mutant clones (Fig. 3I), whereas zone 3 mice had almost no ectopic GS+ clones, despite increased tumor burden (Fig. 3J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong EdU+ hepatocytes in zone 3 mutant mice, only 30% were GS+, thus most proliferating cells were WT.
“However, among the EdU+ hepatocytes in zone 3 mutant mice, only 30% were GS+, thus, most proliferating cells were WT (Fig. 2, J and L).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Ctnnb1 single mutant model, 10 of 18 mice (56%) with Ctnnb1 mutant clones in zone 3 developed tumors, whereas only 1 of 13 mice (8%) with Ctnnb1 mutant clones in zone 1 developed tumors.
“Ten of eighteen mice (56%) with Ctnnb1 mutant clones in zone 3 developed tumors, whereas only 1 of 13 mice (8%) with Ctnnb1 mutant clones in zone 1 developed tumors (Fig. 3, M to O).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no differences in cell death genes such as Casp3/7/8/9, Ripk1, or Mlk1; tumor suppressor genes such as Arid1a, Tp53, or Rb1; or senescence genes such as Cdkn1a, Cdkn2a, Mif, or Saa4.
“In addition, there were no differences in cell death genes such as Casp3/7/8/9, Ripk1, or Mlk1; tumor suppressor genes such as Arid1a, Tp53, or Rb1; or senescence genes such as Cdkn1a, Cdkn2a, Mif, or Saa4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data38 of 42 zone 3 mice (90%) developed at least one visible surface tumor, whereas only 13 of 22 zone 1 mice (59%) developed tumors.
“Notably, 38 of 42 zone 3 mice (90%) developed at least one visible surface tumor, whereas only 13 of 22 zone 1 mice (59%) developed tumors (ratio of mice with tumors/all mice for each genotype, taken from Fig. 3C and table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn both zone 1 and zone 3 mutant mice, only a subset of Tomato+ hepatocytes were also GS+, indicating recombination occurred less efficiently at the Ctnnb1 locus than at the Rosa26LSL-tdTomato locus.
“In both types of mutant mice, only a subset of Tomato+ hepatocytes were also GS+, indicating that recombination occurred less efficiently at the Ctnnb1 locus than at the Rosa26LSL-tdTomato locus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn zone 2-specific Igfbp2-CreER;Ctnnb1(ex3)fl/+;Arid2fl/+ mice, some zone 2 mice developed tumors, but there was no significant difference in the number of tumors in zone 2 mutant mice compared with zone 1 mutant mice.
“Eight to nine months after tamoxifen, some zone 2 mice developed tumors, but there was no significant difference in the number of tumors in zone 2 mutant mice compared with zone 1 mutant mice (Fig. 3L).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSix months after tamoxifen, zone 1 mutant mice harbored GS+ cells clustered around portal tracts, whereas zone 3 mutant mice had very few ectopic GS+ cells, and most remaining GS+ cells were pericentral hepatocytes that normally express GS.
“Six months after tamoxifen administration, zone 1 mutant mice harbored GS+ cells clustered around portal tracts, whereas zone 3 mutant mice had very few ectopic GS+ cells, and most remaining GS+ cells were pericentral hepatocytes that normally express GS (Fig. 2, A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Ctnnb1 heterozygous;Arid2 heterozygous model, 10 of 11 mice (91%) with mutant clones in zone 3 developed tumors, whereas only 5 of 16 mice (31%) with mutant clones in zone 1 developed tumors.
“Ten of eleven mice (91%) with Ctnnb1 heterozygous;Arid2 heterozygous mutant clones in zone 3 developed tumors, whereas only 5 of 16 mice (31%) with mutant clones in zone 1 developed tumors (Fig. 3K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGSEA detected higher cell cycle and lower metabolic gene expression in zone 3 tumors.
“Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) detected higher cell cycle and lower metabolic gene expression in zone 3 tumors (table S3), which was corroborated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for cell cycle genes (Fig. 3Q).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were usually two clusters of mutant clones per mutant liver, suggesting heterogeneity within the mutant population.
“There were usually two clusters of mutant clones per mutant liver, suggesting heterogeneity within the mutant population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn WT mice, CTNNB1 protein was universally localized to hepatocyte membranes, and GS was not expressed outside pericentral hepatocytes.
“In WT mice, CTNNB1 protein was universally localized to hepatocyte membranes, and GS was not expressed outside of pericentral hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAAV-Gstm3 transient overexpression increased LW/BW ratios, but not microtumor area, 1 week after HDT.
“Gstm3 overexpression increased LW/BW ratios, but not microtumor area, 1 week after HDT (Fig. 4, I to K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCompared with vehicle, ethacrynic acid resulted in a lower LW/BW.
“Compared with vehicle, ethacrynic acid did not affect HDT efficiency (fig. S9A) but did result in a lower LW/BW and a 75% reduction in microtumor area (Fig. 5, B to D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwenty-nine of thirty-seven HCCs from all six control mice (78%) did not exhibit Tomato expression, and 8 of 37 (22%) did.
“Twenty-nine of thirty-seven HCCs from all six control mice (78%) did not exhibit Tomato expression, and 8 of 37 (22%) did (table S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRepeating deletion experiments in C57BL/6J found that both Gstm3 and Gstm2 deletion increased survival.
“To assess cancer-specific survival, we repeated the deletion experiments in a less cancer-prone strain background (C57BL/6J) and again found that both Gstm3 and Gstm2 deletion increased survival (Fig. 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne week after HDT confirmed the 2-week results and demonstrated that Cyp2a5, Lpl, Gstm2, Gstm3, and Cdk1 deletion impaired HCC development.
“This confirmed the 2-week results and demonstrated that Cyp2a5, Lpl, Gstm2, Gstm3, and Cdk1 deletion impaired HCC development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThirty-three of eighty-five HCCs from all 6 Gstm3 overexpressing mice (39%) did not express Tomato, and 52 of 85 (61%) did.
“Thirty-three of eighty-five HCCs from all 6 Gstm3 overexpressing mice (39%) did not express Tomato, and 52 of 85 (61%) did (table S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInitial analysis using liver to body weight ratios 2 weeks after HDT confirmed that Cdk1 deletion decreased, whereas Pten deletion increased tumor burden.
“Initial analysis using liver to body weight ratios (LW/BW) 2 weeks after HDT, a proxy for tumor burden, confirmed that Cdk1 deletion decreased, whereas Pten deletion increased tumor burden (Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCtnnb1/Arid2 mutant clones adjacent to portal tracts expanded to maintain a GS+ population in zone 1, whereas mutant clones in zones 3 disappeared.
“Ctnnb1/Arid2 mutant clones adjacent to portal tracts expanded to maintain a GS+ population in zone 1, whereas mutant clones in zones 3 disappeared.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEdU+ cells were more frequently located in zone 1 because the GS+ clones were predominantly in zone 1.
“Thus, EdU+ cells were more frequently located in zone 1 because the GS+ clones were predominantly in zone 1 (Fig. 2, J and K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoth Arid2 heterozygous and homozygous loss accelerated HCC development, but Ctnnb1 activation caused liver tumorigenesis in zone 3 more efficiently than in zone 1, regardless of Arid2 mutation status.
“While both Arid2 heterozygous and homozygous loss accelerated HCC development, Ctnnb1 activation caused liver tumorigenesis in zone 3 more efficiently than in zone 1, regardless of Arid2 mutation status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough tumors could arise from zone 2, many more came from zone 3.
“Although tumors could arise from zone 2, many more came from zone 3 (compare Fig. 3K and Fig. 3L).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn zone 3, mutant GS+ hepatocytes were less competitive than WT hepatocytes, at least in part because of reduced proliferation.
“In zone 3, mutant GS+ hepatocytes were less competitive than WT hepatocytes, at least in part because of reduced proliferation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMost control HCCs originated from zone 3, consistent with Ctnnb1/Arid2 HCC origins.
“This indicated that most control HCCs originated from zone 3, which is consistent with Ctnnb1/Arid2 HCC origins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAlthough the CTNNB1/MYC HCC model was not identical to the Ctnnb1/Arid2 model, its rapid tumorigenesis provided a tractable system for the functional evaluation of zonated genes.
“Although this CTNNB1/MYC HCC model was not identical to the Ctnnb1/Arid2 model, its rapid tumorigenesis provided a tractable system for the functional evaluation of zonated genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataZone 3 hepatocytes were more prone to tumor initiation because glutathione transferases in that zone blocked ferroptosis, promoting the survival and transformation of mutant Ctnnb1 clones.
“This study demonstrated that zone 3 hepatocytes were more prone to tumor initiation because glutathione transferases in that zone blocked ferroptosis, promoting the survival and transformation of mutant Ctnnb1 clones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Ferroptosis is a lipid peroxidation–dependent mechanism of cell death.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese enzymes suppressed ferroptosis, allowing zone 3 mutant hepatocytes to survive and form tumors.
“These enzymes suppressed ferroptosis, a lipid peroxidation–dependent mechanism of cell death, allowing zone 3 mutant hepatocytes to survive and form tumors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Ferroptosis is a lipid peroxidation–dependent mechanism of cell death.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataGstm3-V5 overexpression occurred when the Lox-Stop-Lox was recombined with Cre.
“Gstm3-V5 overexpression occurred when the Lox-Stop-Lox was recombined with Cre (Fig. 4P).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataMice were randomized to receive vehicle control or ethacrynic acid.
“Mice were randomized to receive vehicle control or ethacrynic acid starting 2 days before all mice receiving CTNNB1/MYC HDT then were continued on vehicle or ethacrynic acid for 1 week (Fig. 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOnce established, tumors from distinct zones were phenotypically similar and may not have revealed the differences that originally influenced tumor emergence.
“The above results showed that (i) the degree of premalignant clone expansion in different zones did not predict tumorigenic potential and (ii) the lack of profound gene expression differences in tumors from distinct zones suggested that, once established, the tumors were phenotypically similar and may not have revealed the differences that originally influenced tumor emergence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenZone-defining factors within normal hepatocytes may be more influential determinants of cancer initiation.
“We reasoned that zone-defining factors within normal hepatocytes may be more influential determinants of cancer initiation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe background hepatocytes, but not microtumors, exhibited ectopic V5-tagged GSTM3, confirming that transient overexpression was restricted to hepatocytes.
“The background hepatocytes, but not microtumors, exhibited ectopic V5-tagged GSTM3, confirming that transient overexpression was restricted to hepatocytes (Fig. 4K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe performance of the QuPath pixel classifier on unseen sections was evaluated, and additional annotations were added until microtumors were highlighted as specifically as possible.
“Once the classifier was trained, its performance on unseen sections was evaluated, and more annotations for each class were added until microtumors were highlighted as specifically as possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGstm2 and Gstm3 both inhibit ferroptosis.
“DKO induced a stronger ferroptotic response than either single KO, indicating that Gstm2 and Gstm3 both inhibit ferroptosis (Fig. 5N).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAntioxidant enzymes are needed to protect WT zone 3 cells from dying in a harsh environment.
“It stands to reason that antioxidant enzymes are needed to protect WT zone 3 cells from dying in a harsh environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningClones containing cancer drivers do not necessarily progress to cancer, and the ones that do may not always demonstrate stepwise clonal expansion.
“This suggests that clones containing cancer drivers do not necessarily progress to cancer, and the ones that do may not always demonstrate stepwise clonal expansion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe Leiden clustering resolution of 1.0 was selected for final analyses on the basis of cluster interpretability and marker expression.
“resolution = 1.0 was selected for final analyses on the basis of cluster interpretability and marker expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGstm3 was necessary and sufficient for the suppression of ferroptosis in cancer and noncancer contexts.
“The results were similar, demonstrating that Gstm3 was necessary and sufficient for the suppression of ferroptosis in cancer and noncancer contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
The paper relies on this without support.
The degree to which nontransformed cells harboring oncogenic driver mutations ultimately develop into cancer, or even clonally expand, is unknown.
“Altogether, the degree to which nontransformed cells harboring oncogenic driver mutations ultimately develop into cancer, or even clonally expand, is unknown.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There has not been a head-to-head comparison to assess cancer formation from different zones.
“Previous studies have shown that cells in zone 3 can transform into HCC (22–24), but there has not been a head-to-head comparison to assess cancer formation from different zones.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ferroptosis is a lipid peroxidation–dependent mechanism of cell death.
“These enzymes suppressed ferroptosis, a lipid peroxidation–dependent mechanism of cell death, allowing zone 3 mutant hepatocytes to survive and form tumors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ethacrynic acid inhibits GSTM2 and GSTM3.
“ethacrynic acid, a loop diuretic known to inhibit GSTM2 and GSTM3, also prevented Ctnnb1-driven HCC initiation by increasing ferroptosis in premalignant cells.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Gls2-CreERT2 and Cyp1a2-CreERT2 lines specifically label zone 1 and zone 3 hepatocytes, respectively.
“We first labeled zone 1 hepatocytes in Gls2-CreERT2;Rosa26LSL-tdTomato/+ mice or zone 3 in Cyp1a2-CreERT2;Rosa26LSLtdTomato/+ mice with Tomato.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Tomato expression is a reliable lineage-tracing marker that persists in labeled hepatocytes and their progeny.
“Tomato was used as the lineage-tracing marker.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Gstm3 is more highly expressed in zone 3 than in zone 1.
“We predicted that tumors with a zone 3 bias would be more dependent on Gstm3, because it is more highly expressed in zone 3.”
The paper relies on this without support.
RSL3 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4, and liproxstatin-1 inhibits ferroptosis.
“In HCC53N, ferroptosis induction with a small-molecule inhibitor of GPX4 (RSL3) killed cells, and the ferroptosis inhibitor liproxstatin-1 abrogated RSL3-induced cell death (Fig. 5I, left panel).”
The paper relies on this without support.
GSH is a critical cofactor for GPX4-mediated protection against ferroptosis.
“Next, we measured glutathione (GSH), a critical cofactor for GPX4-mediated protection against ferroptosis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fsp1 overexpression does not have off-target effects that affect tumorigenesis.
“Fsp1 overexpression was confirmed on the mRNA and protein levels (fig. S14, B and C).”
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106 · see citing works
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625 · see citing works
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
Wickham, H. (2016) · Use R! · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 · Cited by 33,612 · see citing works
featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K., & Shi, W. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · Cited by 27,219 · see citing works
Cerami, E., Gao, J., Dogrusoz, U., Gross, B. E., Sumer, S. O., Aksoy, B. A., Jacobsen, A., Byrne, C. J., Heuer, M. L., Larsson, E., et al. (2012) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0095 · Cited by 17,455 · see citing works
Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools
Danecek, P., Bonfield, J., Liddle, J., Marshall, J., Ohan, V., Pollard, M., Whitwham, A., Keane, T., McCarthy, S., Davies, R. M., et al. (2021) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giab008 · Cited by 15,314 · see citing works
Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal
Gao, J., Aksoy, B. A., Dogrusoz, U., Dresdner, G., Gross, B., Sumer, S. O., Sun, Y., Jacobsen, A., Sinha, R., Larsson, E., et al. (2013) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2004088 · Cited by 15,160 · see citing works
SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P., & Theis, F. J. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0 · Cited by 8,881 · see citing works
UALCAN: A Portal for Facilitating Tumor Subgroup Gene Expression and Survival Analyses
Chandrashekar, D. S., Bashel, B., Balasubramanya, S. A. H., Creighton, C. J., Ponce-Rodriguez, I., Chakravarthi, B. V. S. K., & Varambally, S. (2017) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002 · Cited by 6,086 · see citing works
Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9
Doench, J. G., Fusi, N., Sullender, M., Hegde, M., Vaimberg, E. W., Donovan, K. F., Smith, I., Tothova, Z., Wilen, C., Orchard, R., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3437 · Cited by 4,637 · see citing works
Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation
Sezgin, M., & Sankur, B. (2004) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.1631315 · Cited by 4,630 · see citing works
FSP1 is a glutathione-independent ferroptosis suppressor
Doll, S., Freitas, F. P., Shah, R., Aldrovandi, M., da Silva, M. C., Ingold, I., Goya Grocin, A., Xavier da Silva, T. N., Panzilius, E., Scheel, C. H., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1707-0 · Cited by 3,341 · see citing works
Comprehensive and Integrative Genomic Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ally, A., Balasundaram, M., Carlsen, R., Chuah, E., Clarke, A., Dhalla, N., Holt, R. A., Jones, S. J. M., Lee, D., Ma, Y., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046 · Cited by 2,490 · see citing works
Self-citationUALCAN: An update to the integrated cancer data analysis platform
Chandrashekar, D. S., Karthikeyan, S. K., Korla, P. K., Patel, H., Shovon, A. R., Athar, M., Netto, G. J., Qin, Z. S., Kumar, S., Manne, U., et al. (2022) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/j.neo.2022.01.001 · Cited by 2,473 · see citing works
Cheng, Q., Wei, T., Farbiak, L., Johnson, L. T., Dilliard, S. A., & Siegwart, D. J. (2020) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0669-6 · Cited by 2,383 · see citing works
Self-citationSchuppan, D., & Afdhal, N. H. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60383-9 · Cited by 2,089 · see citing works
Schulze, K., Imbeaud, S., Letouzé, E., Alexandrov, L. B., Calderaro, J., Rebouissou, S., Couchy, G., Meiller, C., Shinde, J., Soysouvanh, F., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3252 · Cited by 1,803 · see citing works
High burden and pervasive positive selection of somatic mutations in normal human skin
Martincorena, I., Roshan, A., Gerstung, M., Ellis, P., Van Loo, P., McLaren, S., Wedge, D. C., Fullam, A., Alexandrov, L. B., Tubio, J. M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa6806 · Cited by 1,770 · see citing works
A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function
Skarnes, W. C., Rosen, B., West, A. P., Koutsourakis, M., Bushell, W., Iyer, V., Mujica, A. O., Thomas, M., Harrow, J., Cox, T., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10163 · Cited by 1,708 · see citing works
Visvader, J. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09781 · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
The role of glutathione-S-transferase in anti-cancer drug resistance
Townsend, D. M., & Tew, K. D. (2003) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206940 · Cited by 1,353 · see citing works
Cause, Pathogenesis, and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Diehl, A. M., & Day, C. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1503519 · Cited by 1,283 · see citing works
Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the β‐catenin gene
Harada, N., Tamai, Y., Ishikawa, T., Sauer, B., Takaku, K., Oshima, M., & Taketo, M. M. (1999) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/18.21.5931 · Cited by 1,198 · see citing works
Somatic mutant clones colonize the human esophagus with age
Martincorena, I., Fowler, J. C., Wabik, A., Lawson, A. R. J., Abascal, F., Hall, M. W. J., Cagan, A., Murai, K., Mahbubani, K., Stratton, M. R., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau3879 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver
Halpern, K. B., Shenhav, R., Matcovitch-Natan, O., Tóth, B., Lemze, D., Golan, M., Massasa, E. E., Baydatch, S., Landen, S., Moor, A. E., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21065 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities
Sanson, K. R., Hanna, R. E., Hegde, M., Donovan, K. F., Strand, C., Sullender, M. E., Vaimberg, E. W., Goodale, A., Root, D. E., Piccioni, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07901-8 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
MYC inactivation uncovers pluripotent differentiation and tumour dormancy in hepatocellular cancer
Shachaf, C. M., Kopelman, A. M., Arvanitis, C., Karlsson, Å., Beer, S., Mandl, S., Bachmann, M. H., Borowsky, A. D., Ruebner, B., Cardiff, R. D., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03043 · Cited by 874 · see citing works
CRISPR-mediated direct mutation of cancer genes in the mouse liver
Xue, W., Chen, S., Yin, H., Tammela, T., Papagiannakopoulos, T., Joshi, N. S., Cai, W., Yang, G., Bronson, R., Crowley, D. G., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13589 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Allocati, N., Masulli, M., Di Ilio, C., & Federici, L. (2018) · Oncogenesis · doi:10.1038/s41389-017-0025-3 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Harding, J. J., Nandakumar, S., Armenia, J., Khalil, D. N., Albano, M., Ly, M., Shia, J., Hechtman, J. F., Kundra, R., El Dika, I., et al. (2019) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2293 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Wang, X., Liu, S., Sun, Y., Yu, X., Lee, S. M., Cheng, Q., Wei, T., Gong, J., Robinson, J. J., Zhang, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-022-00755-x · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Self-citationTobacco smoking and somatic mutations in human bronchial epithelium
Yoshida, K., Gowers, K. H. C., Lee-Six, H., Chandrasekharan, D. P., Coorens, T. H. H., Maughan, E. F., Beal, K. M., Menzies, A. H., Millar, F. R., Anderson, E. L., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1961-1 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Single-cell mutation analysis of clonal evolution in myeloid malignancies
Miles, L. A., Bowman, R. L., Merlinsky, T. R., Csete, I. S., Ooi, A. T., Durruthy-Durruthy, R., Bowman, M., Famulare, C. A., Patel, M. A., Méndez, P., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2864-x · Cited by 506 · see citing works
The mutational landscape of normal human endometrial epithelium
Moore, L., Leongamornlert, D., Coorens, T. H. H., Sanders, M. A., Ellis, P., Dentro, S. C., Dawson, K. J., Butler, T., Rahbari, R., Mitchell, T. J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2214-z · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Spatial heterogeneity in the mammalian liver
Ben-Moshe, S., & Itzkovitz, S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0134-x · Cited by 485 · see citing works
CHANAS, S. A., JIANG, Q., McMAHON, M., McWALTER, G. K., McLELLAN, L. I., ELCOMBE, C. R., HENDERSON, C. J., WOLF, C. R., MOFFAT, G. J., ITOH, K., et al. (2002) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20020320 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Protocol for Primary Mouse Hepatocyte Isolation
Charni‐Natan, M., & Goldstein, I. (2020) · STAR Protocols · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100086 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Ahn, S., Jang, S. J., Shim, J. H., Kim, D., Hong, S., Sung, C. O., Baek, D., Haq, F., Ansari, A. A., Lee, S. Y., et al. (2014) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.27198 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Somatic mutations and clonal dynamics in healthy and cirrhotic human liver
Brunner, S. F., Roberts, N. D., Wylie, L. A., Moore, L., Aitken, S. J., Davies, S. E., Sanders, M. A., Ellis, P., Alder, C., Hooks, Y., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1670-9 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Diril, M. K., Ratnacaram, C. K., Padmakumar, V. C., Du, T., Wasser, M., Coppola, V., Tessarollo, L., & Kaldis, P. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1115201109 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Gebhardt, R., & Mecke, D. (1983) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01464.x · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Sekine, S., Lan, B. Y., Bedolli, M., Feng, S., & Hebrok, M. (2006) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.21131 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Liver homeostasis is maintained by midlobular zone 2 hepatocytes
Wei, Y., Wang, Y. G., Jia, Y., Li, L., Yoon, J., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhu, M., Sharma, T., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb1625 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Self-citationProliferation tracing reveals regional hepatocyte generation in liver homeostasis and repair
He, L., Pu, W., Liu, X., Zhang, Z., Han, M., Li, Y., Huang, X., Han, X., Li, Y., Liu, K., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc4346 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Arid1a Has Context-Dependent Oncogenic and Tumor Suppressor Functions in Liver Cancer
Sun, X., Wang, S. C., Wei, Y., Luo, X., Jia, Y., Li, L., Gopal, P., Zhu, M., Nassour, I., Chuang, J.-C., et al. (2017) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.10.007 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-citationSomatic Mutations Increase Hepatic Clonal Fitness and Regeneration in Chronic Liver Disease
Zhu, M., Lu, T., Jia, Y., Luo, X., Gopal, P., Li, L., Odewole, M., Renteria, V., Singal, A. G., Jang, Y., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.026 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Self-citationCappel, D. A., Deja, S., Duarte, J. A. G., Kucejova, B., Iñigo, M., Fletcher, J. A., Fu, X., Berglund, E. D., Liu, T., Elmquist, J. K., et al. (2019) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.03.014 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Broad Distribution of Hepatocyte Proliferation in Liver Homeostasis and Regeneration
Chen, F., Jimenez, R. J., Sharma, K., Luu, H. Y., Hsu, B. Y., Ravindranathan, A., Stohr, B. A., & Willenbring, H. (2020) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.11.001 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
SpatialData: an open and universal data framework for spatial omics
Marconato, L., Palla, G., Yamauchi, K. A., Virshup, I., Heidari, E., Treis, T., Vierdag, W.-M., Toth, M., Stockhaus, S., Shrestha, R., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02212-x · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Emerging mechanisms of cell competition
Baker, N. E. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0262-8 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Spatial sorting enables comprehensive characterization of liver zonation
Ben-Moshe, S., Shapira, Y., Moor, A. E., Manco, R., Veg, T., Bahar Halpern, K., & Itzkovitz, S. (2019) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-019-0109-9 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Spatial sorting enables comprehensive characterization of liver zonation
Ben-Moshe, S., Shapira, Y., Moor, A. E., Halpern, K. B., & Itzkovitz, S. (2019) · doi:10.1101/529784 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Tan, X., Yuan, Y., Zeng, G., Apte, U., Thompson, M. D., Cieply, B., Stolz, D. B., Michalopoulos, G. K., Kaestner, K. H., & Monga, S. P. S. (2008) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.22225 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
MGST1 is a redox-sensitive repressor of ferroptosis in pancreatic cancer cells
Kuang, F., Liu, J., Xie, Y., Tang, D., & Kang, R. (2021) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.01.006 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Convergent somatic mutations in metabolism genes in chronic liver disease
Ng, S. W. K., Rouhani, F. J., Brunner, S. F., Brzozowska, N., Aitken, S. J., Yang, M., Abascal, F., Moore, L., Nikitopoulou, E., Chappell, L., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03974-6 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Adebayo Michael, A. O., Ko, S., Tao, J., Moghe, A., Yang, H., Xu, M., Russell, J. O., Pradhan-Sundd, T., Liu, S., Singh, S., et al. (2019) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.01.002 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Deep whole-genome analysis of 494 hepatocellular carcinomas
Chen, L., Zhang, C., Xue, R., Liu, M., Bai, J., Bao, J., Wang, Y., Jiang, N., Li, Z., Wang, W., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07054-3 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, W., Dai, J., Hou, G., Liu, H., Zheng, S., Wang, X., Lin, Q., Zhang, Y., Lu, M., Gong, Y., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.10.042 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Kumar, S., Sharife, H., Kreisel, T., Mogilevsky, M., Bar-Lev, L., Grunewald, M., Aizenshtein, E., Karni, R., Paldor, I., Shlomi, T., et al. (2019) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.04.003 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
(2002) · PubMed · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Molina-Sánchez, P., Ruiz de Galarreta, M., Yao, M. A., Lindblad, K. E., Bresnahan, E., Bitterman, E., Martin, T. C., Rubenstein, T., Nie, K., Golas, J., et al. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.015 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Ang, C. H., Hsu, S. H., Guo, F., Tan, C. T., Yu, V. C., Visvader, J. E., Chow, P. K. H., & Fu, N. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1908099116 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Zonation of Ribosomal DNA Transcription Defines a Stem Cell Hierarchy in Colorectal Cancer
Morral, C., Stanisavljević, J., Hernando‐Momblona, X., Mereu, E., Álvarez-Varela, A., Cortina, C., Stork, D., Slebe, F., Turón, G., Whissell, G., et al. (2020) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.04.012 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Activating CAR and β-catenin induces uncontrolled liver growth and tumorigenesis
Dong, B., Lee, J.-S., Park, Y.-Y., Yang, F., Xu, G., Huang, W., Finegold, M. J., & Moore, D. D. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6944 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Fiander, H. (2000) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3835(00)00368-2 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Ethacrynic acid and its glutathione conjugate as inhibitors of glutathione<i>S</i>-transferases
Ploemen, J. H. T. M., Ommen, B. V., Bogaards, J. J. P., & Van Bladeren, P. J. (1993) · Xenobiotica · doi:10.3109/00498259309059418 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Kietzmann, T. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20092347 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Nakagawa, H., Hirata, Y., Takeda, K., Hayakawa, Y., Sato, T., Kinoshita, H., Sakamoto, K., Nakata, W., Hikiba, Y., Omata, M., et al. (2011) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.24357 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Lan, T., Hu, Y., Hu, F., Li, H., Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Yu, Y., Jiang, S., Weng, Q., Tian, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.040 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationHale, G., Liu, X., Hu, J., Xu, Z., Che, L., Solomon, D., Tsokos, C., Shafizadeh, N., Chen, X., Gill, R., et al. (2016) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2016.122 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Wang, Z., Zhu, S., Jia, Y., Wang, Y., Kubota, N., Fujiwara, N., Gordillo, R., Lewis, C., Zhu, M., Sharma, T., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.014 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationDai, W., Shen, J., Yan, J., Bott, A. J., Maimouni, S., Daguplo, H. Q., Wang, Y., Khayati, K., Guo, J. Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci161408 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationGiera, S., Braeuning, A., Köhle, C., Bursch, W., Metzger, U., Buchmann, A., & Schwarz, M. (2010) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq033 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Tao, J., Krutsenko, Y., Moghe, A., Singh, S., Poddar, M., Bell, A., Oertel, M., Singhi, A. D., Geller, D., Chen, X., et al. (2021) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.31730 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
BAF200 Is Required for Heart Morphogenesis and Coronary Artery Development
He, L., Tian, X., Zhang, H., Hu, T., Huang, X., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., & Zhou, B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109493 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationDuan, Y., Tian, L., Gao, Q., Liang, L., Zhang, W., Yang, Y., Zheng, Y., Pan, E., Li, S., & Tang, N. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.10244 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Zonation in NASH – A key paradigm for understanding pathophysiology and clinical outcomes
Steinman, J. B., Salomao, M. A., & Pajvani, U. B. (2021) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.15025 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Nrf2 and Antioxidant Defense Against CYP2E1 Toxicity
Cederbaum, A. I. (2013) · Subcellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5881-0_2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The RSPO‐LGR4/5‐ZNRF3/RNF43 module in liver homeostasis, regeneration, and disease
Annunziato, S., Sun, T., & Tchorz, J. S. (2022) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.32328 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Tan, X., Huang, X., Niu, B., Guo, X., Lei, X., & Qu, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.1102158 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
GST-pi expression correlates with oxidative stress and apoptosis in breast cancer
Huang, J., Tan, P., Tan, B., & Bay, B. (2004) · Oncology Reports · doi:10.3892/or.12.4.921 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Huang, W.-J., Tsai, J.-H., & Jeng, Y.-M. (2017) · Journal of the Formosan Medical Association · doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2016.09.013 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Cell fate analysis of zone 3 hepatocytes in liver injury and tumorigenesis
Kurosaki, S., Nakagawa, H., Hayata, Y., Kawamura, S., Matsushita, Y., Yamada, T., Uchino, K., Hayakawa, Y., Suzuki, N., Hata, M., et al. (2021) · JHEP Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100315 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Lin, Y.-H., Wei, Y., Zeng, Q., Wang, Y., Pagani, C. A., Li, L., Zhu, M., Wang, Z., Hsieh, M.-H., Corbitt, N., et al. (2023) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.007 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationChung, A. S., Mettlen, M., Ganguly, D., Lu, T., Wang, T., Brekken, R. A., Hsiehchen, D., & Zhu, H. (2020) · Cancer Prevention Research · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0200 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, T., Jinlin, D., Wang, F., Yuan, Z., Xue, J., Lu, T., Huang, W., Liu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215692 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Collino, A., Termanini, A., Nicoli, P., Diaferia, G., Polletti, S., Recordati, C., Castiglioni, V., Caruso, D., Mitro, N., Natoli, G., et al. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007380 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Balogun, O., Shao, D., Carson, M., King, T., Kosar, K., Zhang, R., Zeng, G., Cornuet, P., Goel, C., Lee, E., et al. (2024) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000485 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The origin of hepatocellular carcinoma is regulated by metabolic zonation
Guo, J. (2025) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17149330
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hallmarks of liver cancer: Therapeutic implications
Llovet, J. M., Pinyol, R., Affò, S., Yarchoan, M. M., Gores, G. J., Kelley, R. K., Lowe, S. W., Sia, D., & Villanueva, A. (2026) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2026.03.001 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Global Advances in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research and Therapy in 2025
Hu, B., & Gao, Q. (2026) · Cancer Innovation · doi:10.1002/cai2.70059 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Hot Zones for Liver Cancer: Metabolic Zonation, Ferroptosis, and the Origins of HCC
Barrows, K. M., & Porat‐Shliom, N. (2026) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-25-5839 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Metabolic permissiveness: how tissue context shapes cancerPreprint
Moschandrea, C., & Frezza, C. (2026) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.353516.125 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…drivers ( Ctnnb1 and Arid2 ), HCC originated predominantly from pericen-tral (zone 3) hepatocytes despite mutant clones expanding more robustly in periportal (zone 1) regions, demonstrating that spatially encoded metabolic programs define oncogenic competence within the tissue (Guo et al. 2025).”
Unraveling the tapestry: Lessons from multi-omics and spatial biology in hepatocellular cancer
Massoudi, D., Srivastava, A., & Dhanasekaran, R. (2026) · Hepatology · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000001716 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Yang, Q., Lin, Y., Lin, Y., et al. (2026) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2026.117693 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, J., Dai, Y.-H., Zhu, Y., et al. (2026) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6c02580 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Senft, D. (2025) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-025-00899-4
Liver Zonation Disruption Fuels Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Liver DiseasePreprint
Yang, S. B., Tullio, F. D., Yang, L., Cogliati, B., Schnidrig, D., Benjak, A., Roshan, S., Almeida, J. I., Li, L. Y., Ma, S., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.06.692782
Self-citationMetabolic borders shape immune resistance
Savas, A. C., & Grivennikov, S. I. (2026) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-025-01858-9
RNF126 is a peroxisomal fate switch enabling redifferentiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma
Su, Q., Yang, Y., Ren, J., Zhang, Y., Wu, Q., Wu, Q., Han, X., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2535777123
An, Z., Wang, X., & Jia, Y. (2026) · Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej · doi:10.2478/ahem-2026-0007
“However, mounting epidemiological and experimental evidence has raised concerns about its potential long-term health risks [3], particularly in relation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [4] – one of the most common and lethal malignancies worldwide with a complex pathogenesis [5].”
Self-citationLiver endothelial zonation orchestrates hepatic steatosis onset through retinoic acid–regulated FGF1
Fang, Z., Che, B., Ling, Y., Liu, P., Liu, J., Song, P., Yue, Z. H., Ruan, B., Lin, Z., Xu, H. X., et al. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aed4384 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Notably, recent work has shown that hepatocellular carcinoma preferentially develops in the PC zone relying on PC metabolic genes ( 37 ), whose expression levels are increased and expanded following MASLD ( 16 ).”
Late-stage dedifferentiation and epigenetic memory of cancer stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma
Hu, Y., Tan, K., Feng, N., Li, J., Chen, L., Lin, Y., Wang, H., & He, Y.-F. (2026) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-026-08494-3
“Notably, the COO analysis results are highly consistent with the recent observation of Zone 3 hepatocyte-derived tumours in murine liver lineage-tracing studies [54].”
Targeting amino acid metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma
Wu, Y., & Wong, C. C.-L. (2026) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2026.06.002
Tertiary lymphoid structures and hepatocellular carcinoma: Guardian and executioner
Zong, Q., Liu, C., Lv, H., et al. (2026) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2026.218720
Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Reprograms the Hepatic Metastatic Niche
Karabicici, M., & Seki, E. (2026) · Seminars in Liver Disease · doi:10.1055/a-2921-0092
Adaptive oncogenesis of β-catenin emerges from declining liver tissue integrity
Illendula, A., Hewett, C. K., Hayata, Y., Strathearn, L. S., He, G., Carballo-Botinas, L., Navas-Sanz, S., Niqui-Capdevila, M., Garcia-Santos, A., Bernabé-Pérez, R., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76373-y · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…this model by showing that mutant β -catenin combined with Arid2 loss or Myc overexpression produces different outcomes depending on hepatic zonation, establishing that genetic alterations interact with intrinsic hepatocyte subpopulation features in the normal liver to drive oncogenicity 19,20 .”
Tian, T., Xue, Y., Sun, C., Yang, L., Wang, J., Jin-Smith, B., Barkin, J., Nzegwu, M., Jia, L., Zhou, H., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-77089-9
“Zonation has appeared as a determinant of malignancy origin, with perivenous genes such as Glutathione S-transferase mu 2 ( GSTM2 ) and GSTM3 supporting cancer initiation 6 .”
Self-citationDong, Z., Gong, M., Wang, G., & Wang, H. (2026) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox15091053
“We acknowledge that oncogenic mutations (e.g., initiating HCC) represent a critical context in which Zone 3 hepatocytes can mount robust antioxidant programs to resist ferroptosis [73].”
Spatial immune dysregulation in MASLD: integration of lobular zoning, metabolism and immune function
Gao, D., Wang, X., Mu, S., Sun, Y., & Wu, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1922207 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Concentric zones of high and low metabolic activity and blood fl ow have formed in the liver lobules; therefore, these areas show structural polarity and, as a result, provide different conditions for the development, activation, and function of immune cells (34).”
InfluentialMulti-organelle signatures map cell-state diversity and metabolic adaptation in tissues
Adhikari, R., Hillsley, A. V., Johnson, A. D., Gao, S. M., Espinosa-Medina, I., Funke, J., & Feliciano, D. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ady6372 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cuproptosis and ferroptosis: signal pathways, diseases and therapeutic targets
Li, Y.-Y., & Tay, F. R. (2026) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-026-03043-2
Spatial metabolism uncouples clonal fitness from liver cancer initiation
Wan, K., Tang, K., Tian, Q., et al. (2026) · Journal of Translational Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.20517/jtgg.2026.103
- Authors
- Guo, J., Liang, R., Chung, A., Li, Z., Li, B., Chen, E., Li, L., Wang, J., Hsieh, M.-H., Fang, I. X., Kroger, B., Wang, Y., Zhu, M., Ren, X., Mannino, G., Jia, Y., Wei, Y., Moore, S., Siegwart, D. J., Chung, S. S., Wang, Z., Sharma, T., Komjeti, S., Han, Y., Gopal, P., Xiao, G., Wang, T., & Zhu, H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Children’s Research Institute and Children’s Research Institute Mouse Genome Engineering Core, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Corresponding author
- Guo, Jason
- Liang, Roger
- Chung, Andrew
- Li, Zhijie
- Zhu, Hao
- ORCID
- Guo, Jason
- Liang, Roger
- Chung, Andrew
- Li, Zhijie
- Li, Boyuan
- Chen, Eric
- Li, Lin
- Hsieh, Meng-Hsiung
- Fang, Ivy Xiangyi
- Kroger, Benjamin
- Wang, Yunguan
- Zhu, Min
- Mannino, Greg
- Jia, Yuemeng
- Wei, Yonglong
- Moore, Stephen
- Siegwart, Daniel J.
- Chung, Stephen S.
- Wang, Zixi
- Sharma, Tripti
- Han, Yi
- Gopal, Purva
- Xiao, Guanghua
- Wang, Tao
- Zhu, Hao
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2026-01-29
- Volume
- 391
- Issue
- 6784
- Pages
- eadv7129-eadv7129
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC12999168
- OpenAlex
- W4415970816
- Semantic Scholar
- 69b47552b9eba80646c881bba6507c7ed380c1ac
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society
- Mark Foundation For Cancer Research (21-003-ELA)
- NIH NCI (CA251928)
- NIH NIDDK (DK125396)
- NIH NIAAA (AA028791)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Keywords
- hepatocellular carcinoma, tumor origin, CTNNB1, ARID2, GSTM2, GSTM3, ferroptosis, mouse model, cancer metabolism
- MeSH terms
- Ferroptosis, Animals, Glutathione Transferase, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver, Liver Neoplasms, Mutation, Transcription Factors, beta Catenin, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-22.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-22.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review