Cited by 6Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

The AI-personality nexus: How nursing students' traits shape use, learning and adaptation in artificial intelligence-driven education in Saudi Arabia

Ali, Sayed Ibrahim, Shaban, Mostafa·2025·Nurse Education in Practice

Abstract

Aim This study explored how personality traits influence undergraduate nursing students' use, attitudes and satisfaction with artificial intelligence (AI)-based educational tools in Saudi Arabia. It also examined the mediating role of AI use frequency in the relationship between personality and satisfaction.Background With AI increasingly integrated into nursing education, understanding how individual learner traits shape engagement with these tools is essential for optimizing learning experiences.Design A cross-sectional, correlational design was used.Methods A total of 159 undergraduate nursing students from King Faisal University completed an online survey, including the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and the AI in Nursing Education Questionnaire (AINEQ). Descriptive statistics, logistic regression and path analysis were performed to assess associations and mediation.Results Openness and Conscientiousness significantly predicted frequent AI use (p < 0.01), while Neuroticism negatively predicted satisfaction (p = 0.03). AI use frequency significantly mediated the relationship between personality traits (Openness, Conscientiousness) and satisfaction (indirect βs = 0.13 and 0.11, p < 0.01). Extraversion and Agreeableness were not significantly related to AI use. Female students and those in advanced academic levels reported greater AI engagement.Conclusion Personality traits influence AI adoption and satisfaction among nursing students. Personalizing AI-based learning strategies to account for personality differences may enhance student engagement and educational outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104498

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ali, S. I., & Shaban, M.
Affiliations
  • King Faisal University (SA)
  • Cairo University (EG)
Corresponding author
Shaban, Mostafa
Venue
Nurse Education in Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-08
Volume
87
Pages
104498
ISSN
1471-5953 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413053595
Cited by
6
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education in Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deanship of Scientific Research, King Faisal University
  • King Faisal University (KFU252787)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, nursing students, personality traits, Big Five personality traits, AI use frequency, student satisfaction, artificial intelligence adoption, openness to experience, conscientiousness, neuroticism, mediation, personalized learning, Saudi Arabia
MeSH terms
Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saudi Arabia, Students, Nursing, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review