Cited by 4Innovations in Medical EducationNursing education and managementAnatomy and Medical Technology

Fostering understanding of anatomy and physiology among undergraduate nursing students for integration into clinical practice: An integrative literature review

Nuuyoma, Vistolina, Mukerenge, Ndinohokwe F., Kuugongelwa, Suama·2025·Nurse Education in Practice

Abstract

Aim To critically examine and synthesise peer-reviewed scientific literature to describe how undergraduate nursing students can be prepared for the integration of anatomy and physiology into clinical practice. Background Anatomy and physiology courses provide a scientific foundation for health and disease processes and inform all interventions in their management. However, integrating anatomy and physiology into clinical practice is one of the more challenging aspects of nursing education. Design An integrative literature review METHODS: Data were retrieved from PubMed Central, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, Medline and EBSCOHOST databases, including CINAHL. Quality was ensured through the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Appraisal Tool. Data synthesis occurred alongside thematic analysis, which was conducted using a reflexive thematic analysis approach. The PRISMA guidelines were followed for reporting findings. Results Twenty-one articles were included in the review, representing studies across 11 countries in Africa, America, Asia and Europe. The findings revealed that preparation for undergraduate nursing students for the integration of anatomy and physiology into clinical practice is through learner-centred teaching and learning approaches, the use of technology, curriculum transformation, practical educational strategies, the clinical setting as a learning context, an interdisciplinary approach and the integration of anatomy and physiology within practical assessments. Conclusions…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104575

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuuyoma, V., Mukerenge, N. F., & Kuugongelwa, S.
Affiliations
University of Namibia (NA)
Corresponding author
Nuuyoma, Vistolina
Venue
Nurse Education in Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-10
Volume
88
Pages
104575
ISSN
1471-5953 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414826467
Cited by
3
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education in Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sigma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
anatomy and physiology education, undergraduate nursing students, integration into clinical practice, nursing curriculum reform, learner-centred teaching, educational technology, clinical learning, interdisciplinary teaching, practical assessment
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Physiology, Students, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review