Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 846

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis

Open access
Marsh, Abigail A., Blair, R.J.R.·2008·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.08.003

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 97 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Matheson, 2005, Emotional understanding in aggressive and nonaggressive individuals with mild or moderate mental retardation, American Journal of Mental Retardation, 110, 57, 10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110<57:EUIAAN>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110<57:euiaan>2.0.co;2
  2. McCown, 1986, Inability of delinquents to recognize facial affects, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 489

Cited by

See all 846

Metadata

Authors
Marsh, A. A., & Blair, R. J. R.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
454-465
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972897873
Cited by
846
References
97
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.08.003
The paper
Marsh, A. A., & Blair, R. J. R. (2008). Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.08.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.