Cited by 2,049Cultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyFace Recognition and Perception

On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis

Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, Ambady, Nalini·2002·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

A meta-analysis examined emotion recognition within and across cultures. Emotions were universally recognized at better-than-chance levels. Accuracy was higher when emotions were both expressed and recognized by members of the same national, ethnic, or regional group, suggesting an in-group advantage. This advantage was smaller for cultural groups with greater exposure to one another, measured in terms of living in the same nation, physical proximity, and telephone communication. Majority group members were poorer at judging minority group members than the reverse. Cross-cultural accuracy was lower in studies that used a balanced research design, and higher in studies that used imitation rather than posed or spontaneous emotional expressions. Attributes of study design appeared not to moderate the size of the in-group advantage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.203

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The universality of facial expressions across different cultures has greatly facilitated the development of FER systems.

    “The universality of facial expressions across different cultures, as demonstrated in this well-known study at [7], has greatly facilitated the development of FER systems.”

    From SAFER: Situation Aware Facial Emotion Recognition (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

  • Individuals are approximately 9% more accurate at recognizing emotions expressed by members of their own cultural groups.

    “individuals are approximately 9% more accurate at recognizing emotions expressed by members of their own cultural groups”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Elfenbein & Ambady 2002

  • Ample research has documented the role of culture in emotion perception, showing a combination of universals and "dialects".

    “Although ample research has documented the role of culture in emotion perception, showing a combination of universals and “dialects” (Elfenbein & Ambady 2002), how culture influences the social effects of emotions is poorly understood, as research to date has almost exclusively studied Western samples.”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Elfenbein & Ambady 2002

  • One's understanding of emotions is dependent on one's cultural background; recognition of emotions is better between members of the same cultural group; perceiving and expressing emotions is determined by prevailing cultural models.

    “evidence suggests that one's understanding of emotions is dependent on one's cultural background, that recognition of one's own and others' emotions is better between members of the same cultural group, 162 and that perceiving and expressing emotions is determined by the prevailing cultural models. 163”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [162]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2002-03
Volume
128
Issue
2
Pages
203-235
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2159190230
Cited by
2,049
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 169 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 160 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 113 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 73
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
emotion recognition, universal emotions, cultural specificity, in-group advantage, intergroup differences, physical proximity, telephone communication, emotional expression
MeSH terms
Affect, Cognition, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review