Cited by 224Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rodent empathy and affective neuroscience

Open access
Panksepp, Jules B., Lahvis, Garet P.·2011·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

In the past few years, several experimental studies have suggested that empathy occurs in the social lives of rodents. Thus, rodent behavioral models can now be developed to elucidate the mechanistic substrates of empathy at levels that have heretofore been unavailable. For example, the finding that mice from certain inbred strains express behavioral and physiological responses to conspecific distress, while others do not, underscores that the genetic underpinnings of empathy are specifiable and that they could be harnessed to develop new therapies for human psychosocial impairments. However, the advent of rodent models of empathy is met at the outset with a number of theoretical and semantic problems that are similar to those previously confronted by studies of empathy in humans. The distinct underlying components of empathy must be differentiated from one another and from lay usage of the term. The primary goal of this paper is to review a set of seminal studies that are directly relevant to developing a concept of empathy in rodents. We first consider some of the psychological phenomena that have been associated with empathy, and within this context, we consider the component processes, or endophenotypes of rodent empathy. We then review a series of recent experimental studies that demonstrate the capability of rodents to detect and respond to the affective state of their social partners. We focus primarily on experiments that examine how rodents share affective experiences of fear, but we also highlight how similar types of experimental paradigms can be utilized to evaluate the possibility that rodents share positive affective experiences. Taken together, these studies were inspired by Jaak Panksepp's theory that all mammals are capable of felt affective experiences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.013

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 86 references

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lipps, 1903, Einfühlung, innere Nachahmung, und Organepfindungen, Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 1, 185

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 223

Metadata

Authors
Panksepp, J. B., & Lahvis, G. P.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Panksepp, Jules B.
  • Lahvis, Garet P.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
1864-1875
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002401366
Cited by
224
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD046716)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
empathy, rodents, affective neuroscience, inbred mouse strains, endophenotypes, positive affective states, Panksepp
MeSH terms
Affect, Animals, Empathy, Fear, Interpersonal Relations, Neurosciences, Pain, Rodentia, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review