The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Left–right asymmetries of behaviour and nervous system in invertebrates
Open accessAbstract
Evidence of left-right asymmetries in invertebrates has begun to emerge, suggesting that lateralization of the nervous system may be a feature of simpler brains as well as more complex ones. A variety of studies have revealed sensory and motor asymmetries in behaviour, as well as asymmetries in the nervous system, in invertebrates. Asymmetries in behaviour are apparent in olfaction (antennal asymmetries) and in vision (preferential use of the left or right visual hemifield during activities such as foraging or escape from predators) in animals as different as bees, fruitflies, cockroaches, octopuses, locusts, ants, spiders, crabs, snails, water bugs and cuttlefish. Asymmetries of the nervous system include lateralized position of specific brain structures (e.g., in fruitflies and snails) and of specific neurons (e.g., in nematodes). As in vertebrates, lateralization can occur both at the individual and at the population-level in invertebrates. Theoretical models have been developed supporting the hypothesis that the alignment of the direction of behavioural and brain asymmetries at the population-level could have arisen as a result of social selective pressures, when individually asymmetrical organisms had to coordinate with each other. The evidence reviewed suggests that lateralization at the population-level may be more likely to occur in social species among invertebrates, as well as vertebrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Suzuki, H., Thiele, T. R., Faumont, S., Ezcurra, M., Lockery, S. R., & Schafer, W. R. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06927 · Cited by 256
Laterality and human evolution
Corballis, M. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.96.3.492 · Cited by 250
Brain asymmetry and long-term memory
Pascual, A., Huang, K.-L., Neveu, J., & Préat, T. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/427605a · Cited by 208
Octopus Arm Choice Is Strongly Influenced by Eye Use
Byrne, R. A., Kuba, M. J., Meisel, D. V., Griebel, U., & Mather, J. A. (2006) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2006.04.026 · Cited by 46
Cited by
Natural variability in bee brain size and symmetry revealed by micro-CT imaging and deep learning
Lösel, P. D., Monchanin, C., Lebrun, R., Jayme, A., Relle, J. J., Devaud, J.-M., Heuveline, V., & Lihoreau, M. (2023) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011529 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Frasnelli, E., Vallortigara, G., & Rogers, L. J.
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1273-1291
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973450166
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Left–right asymmetries of behaviour and nervous system in invertebrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.006
- The paper
- Frasnelli, E., Vallortigara, G., & Rogers, L. J. (2012). Left–right asymmetries of behaviour and nervous system in invertebrates. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.