Cited by 48Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Familial Alzheimer's disease sustained by presenilin 2 mutations: Systematic review of literature and genotype–phenotype correlation

Canevelli, Marco, Piscopo, Paola, Talarico, Giuseppina, Vanacore, Nicola, Blasimme, Alessandro, Crestini, Alessio, Tosto, Giuseppe, Troili, Fernanda +3 more·2014·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD), despite representing a rare condition, is attracting a growing interest in the scientific community. Improved phenotyping of FAD cases may have a relevant impact both in clinical and research contexts. We performed a systematic review of studies describing the phenotypic features of FAD cases sustained by PSEN2 mutations, the less common cause of monogenic AD. Special attention was given to the clinical manifestations as well as to the main findings coming from the most commonly and widely adopted diagnostic procedures. Basing on the collected data, we also attempted to conduct a genotype-phenotype correlation analysis. Overall, the mutations involving the PSEN2 gene represent an extremely rare cause of FAD, having been reported to date in less than 200 cases. They are mainly associated, despite some peculiar and heterogeneous features, to a typical AD phenotype. Nevertheless, the frequent occurrence of psychotic symptoms may represent a potential distinctive element. The scarcity of available phenotypic descriptions strongly limits the implementation of genotype-phenotype correlations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PSEN2 mutations N141I and M239V represent approximately 75% of all PSEN2 mutations.

    “The mutations N141I (Volga German pedigree) and M239V represent ~75% of all PSEN2 mutations (91).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [91]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canevelli, M., Piscopo, P., Talarico, G., Vanacore, N., Blasimme, A., Crestini, A., Tosto, G., Troili, F., Lenzi, G. L., Confaloni, A., & Bruno, G.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
Corresponding author
Canevelli, Marco
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
42
Pages
170-179
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079253178
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
familial Alzheimer's disease, presenilin 2, PSEN2 mutations, genotype-phenotype correlation, clinical features, psychotic symptoms, diagnostic procedures, phenotypic heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Family, Humans, Mutation, Phenotype, Presenilin-2, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review