Cited by 9Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Thirty years of collaboration with Gabriel horn

Bateson, Patrick·2015·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

All the collaborative work described in this review was on the process of behavioural imprinting occurring early in the life of domestic chicks. Finding a link between learning and a change in the brain was only a first step in establishing a representation of the imprinting object. A series of overlapping experiments were necessary to eliminate alternative explanations. Once completed, a structure, the intermediate and medial mesopallium (IMM), was found to be strongly linked to the formation of a neural representation of the object used for imprinting the birds. With the site identified, lesion experiments showed that it was necessary for imprinting but not associative learning. Also the two sides of the brain responded differently with the left IMM acting as a permanent store and the right side acting as a way station to other parts of the brain. The collaborative work led to many studies by Gabriel Horn with others on the molecular and cellular bases of imprinting, and also to neural net modelling and behavioural studies with me on the nature of category formation in intact animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.019

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main thrust in imprinting research apart from mechanism has been individual-level recognition, first in recognizing the mother and second in setting up a standard against which the individual can prefer to mate with a partner that differs slightly from close kin (sexual imprinting).

    “The main thrust in imprinting research apart from the emphasis on mechanism has been individual-level recognition, first in recognizing the mother and, second, in setting up a standard against which the individual can prefer to mate with a partner that differs slightly from close kin— recognized as a result of sexual imprinting (for a review see Bateson, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bateson, P.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Bateson, Patrick
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
50
Pages
4-11
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976043287
Cited by
9
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
domestic chicks, associative learning, hemispheric lateralization, category formation, neural network modeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Chickens, Humans, Imprinting, Psychological, Male, Memory, Models, Neurological, Neural Networks, Computer, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review