CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 172Child Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuropsychological functioning of childhood trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis

Malarbi, S., Abu-Rayya, H.M., Muscara, F., Stargatt, R.·2017·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study reviewed evidence for cognitive impairments in trauma-exposed children with and without PTSD. Twenty-seven studies were eligible for meta-analysis, totalling 1526 participants, including 412 trauma-exposed children (PTSD unknown), 300 children with PTSD (PTSD+), 323 children without PTSD (PTSD-), and 491 trauma-naive controls. Eligible studies mostly investigated familial-maltreatment trauma (k=22). Trauma-exposed children (PTSD unknown) performed more poorly overall than controls (d=-0.57). Cognitive deficits were seen in PTSD+ compared to controls, including a large effect size (ES) for general intelligence (d=-0.88), moderate ESs for language/verbal (d=-0.65), visuospatial (d=-0.53), information processing (d=-0.62), learning and memory (d=-0.67), and executive skills (d=-0.52). PTSD+ showed poorer general intelligence (d=-0.28) and visuospatial skills (d=-0.42) compared to PTSD-, whilst PTSD- showed poorer executive function (d=-0.23) and learning and memory (d=-0.61) compared to controls. In conclusion, trauma-exposed children showed cognitive deficits compared to controls, although greatest deficits were associated with PTSD diagnosis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.004

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 127 references

3 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Brennan, S.G., 2003. The relationship between maltreatment in childhood and delinquency: An examination of IQ and executive functions(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from US, ProQuest information & learning, (63).
  2. Broomand, C., 2003. The effects of physical abuse on the development of executive functions in children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from US, ProQuest information & learning. 63.
  3. Cianciulli, C. (2001). Declarative memory, cortisol reactivity, and psychological symptoms in chronically abused girls(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from US, ProQuest information & learning, (61).
  4. Goodman, M.B., 1996. Cracks in the bell curve: The impact of chronic and complex trauma on the cognitive skills and knowledge of school-age children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from US, ProQuest information & learning. 57.
  5. Hoffman, C., 2008. Executive function of children with post traumatic stress disorder (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from US, ProQuest information & learning. 69.
  6. Mills, 2011, Child Abuse Neglect., 127, 4
  7. Palmer, L., 1996. Neuropsychological sequelae in psychologically traumatized children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from US, ProQuest information & learning. 56.
  8. Warren, A.M., 1997. Neuropsychological aspects of sustained attention in sexually abused children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from US, ProQuest information & learning. 58.
  9. Whitlock, T.L., 2009. Comparison of exposure to trauma and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from US, ProQuest information & learning. 69.
  10. Yehuda, 2015, Post-traumatic stress disorder, Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim., 1, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Malarbi, S., Abu-Rayya, H. M., Muscara, F., & Stargatt, R.
Affiliations
Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Malarbi, S.
ORCID
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
72
Pages
68-86
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.004
OpenAlex
W2553975206
Semantic Scholar
60f65cb935aa878c32163698e1ed38d0a2ac1b64
Cited by
172
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
childhood trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, neuropsychological performance, cognitive impairment, general intelligence, executive function, learning and memory, visuospatial ability, information processing, family maltreatment, trauma-exposed children
MeSH terms
Child, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Learning, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review