Cited by 42Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsEmbodied and Extended CognitionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 228 of the 230 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.

Interoceptive technologies for psychiatric interventions: From diagnosis to clinical applications

Open access

Abstract

Interoception-the perception of internal bodily signals-has emerged as an area of interest due to its implications in emotion and the prevalence of dysfunctional interoceptive processes across psychopathological conditions. Despite the importance of interoception in cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry, its experimental manipulation remains technically challenging. This is due to the invasive nature of existing methods, the limitation of self-report and unimodal measures of interoception, and the absence of standardized approaches across disparate fields. This article integrates diverse research efforts from psychology, physiology, psychiatry, and engineering to address this oversight. Following a general introduction to the neurophysiology of interoception as hierarchical predictive processing, we review the existing paradigms for manipulating interoception (e.g., interoceptive modulation), their underlying mechanisms (e.g., interoceptive conditioning), and clinical applications (e.g., interoceptive exposure). We suggest a classification for interoceptive technologies and discuss their potential for diagnosing and treating mental health disorders. Despite promising results, considerable work is still needed to develop standardized, validated measures of interoceptive function across domains and before these technologies can translate safely and effectively to clinical settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105478

Cites

228 of 230 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–230 of 230

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Drury, 1919, The percentage of carbon dioxide in the alveolar air and the tolerance to accumulating carbon dioxide in so-called irritable heart of soldiers, Heart, 7, 165
  2. Heldestad, 2010, Reproducibility and influence of test modality order on thermal perception and thermal pain thresholds in quantitative sensory testing, Clin. Neurophysiol., 121, 1878, 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.055 · DOI
  3. Opdensteinen, K. et al., Pain, in press for publication.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Schoeller, F., Horowitz, A. H., Jain, A., Maes, P., Reggente, N., Christov-Moore, L., Pezzulo, G., Barca, L., Allen, M., Salomon, R., Miller, M., Di Lernia, D., Riva, G., Tsakiris, M., Chalah, M. A., Klein, A., Zhang, B., Garcia, T., Pollack, U., Trousselard, M., Verdonk, C., Dumas, G., Adrien, V., & Friston, K.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR)
  • Child Mind Institute (US)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
156
Pages
105478
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388948727
Cited by
42
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 945539)
  • Lundbeckfonden (R272‐2017‐4345)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (ERC-2016-COG, R272-2017-4345, #945539, 820213)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (dgecr-2023-00089)
  • H2020 European Research Council (820213, 948788, 724537)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
interoception, interoceptive conditioning, interoceptive exposure, predictive processing, mental illness, psychiatric diagnosis, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Cognitive Neuroscience, Awareness, Mental Disorders, Emotions, Heart Rate, Humans, Self Report, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review