The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time series forecasting of petroleum production using deep LSTM recurrent networks
Abstract
Abstract Time series forecasting (TSF) is the task of predicting future values of a given sequence using historical data. Recently, this task has attracted the attention of researchers in the area of machine learning to address the limitations of traditional forecasting methods, which are time-consuming and full of complexity. With the increasing availability of extensive amounts of historical data along with the need of performing accurate production forecasting, particularly a powerful forecasting technique infers the stochastic dependency between past and future values is highly needed. In this paper, we propose a deep learning approach capable to address the limitations of traditional forecasting approaches and show accurate predictions. The proposed approach is a deep long-short term memory (DLSTM) architecture, as an extension of the traditional recurrent neural network. Genetic algorithm is applied in order to optimally configure DLSTM’s optimum architecture. For evaluation purpose, two case studies from the petroleum industry domain are carried out using the production data of two actual oilfields. Toward a fair evaluation, the performance of the proposed approach is compared with several standard methods, either statistical or soft computing. Using different measurement criteria, the empirical results show that the proposed DLSTM model outperforms other standard approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Engle, R. F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912773 · Cited by 20,795
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Another look at measures of forecast accuracy
Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 · Cited by 5,757
Cited by
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
An optimized model using LSTM network for demand forecasting
Abbasimehr, H., Shabani, M., & Yousefi, M. (2020) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106435 · Cited by 538
Sagheer, A., & Kotb, M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55320-6 · Cited by 351
Self-citationImproving time series forecasting using LSTM and attention models
Abbasimehr, H., & Paki, R. (2022) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02761-x · Cited by 312
Forecast Methods for Time Series Data: A Survey
Liu, Z., Zhu, Z., Gao, J., & Xu, C. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3091162 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Sagheer, A., & Kotb, M.
- Venue
- Neurocomputing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 323
- Pages
- 203-213
- ISSN
- 0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2894821558
- Cited by
- 968
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 50.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time series forecasting of petroleum production using deep LSTM recurrent networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.082
- The paper
- Sagheer, A., & Kotb, M. (2019). Time series forecasting of petroleum production using deep LSTM recurrent networks. Neurocomputing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.