PreprintCited by 11,008Neural Networks and ApplicationsSpeech Recognition and SynthesisTopic Modeling

Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling

Open access
Chung, Junyoung, Gulcehre, Caglar, Cho, KyungHyun, Bengio, Yoshua·2014·arXiv

Abstract

In this paper we compare different types of recurrent units in recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Especially, we focus on more sophisticated units that implement a gating mechanism, such as a long short-term memory (LSTM) unit and a recently proposed gated recurrent unit (GRU). We evaluate these recurrent units on the tasks of polyphonic music modeling and speech signal modeling. Our experiments revealed that these advanced recurrent units are indeed better than more traditional recurrent units such as tanh units. Also, we found GRU to be comparable to LSTM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recurrent neural networks and their variants, including long short-term memory and gated recurrent units, are effective for sequence modeling, capturing the impact of historical measurements on the current SOC.

    “RNNs and their variants, including long short-term memory (LSTM)[23] and gated recurrent units (GRUs)[24], are effective for sequence modeling, capturing the impact of historical measurements on the current SOC[25].”

    From Advancements in the estimation of the state of charge of lithium-ion battery: a comprehensive review of traditional and deep learning approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Background (p. 2) says RNNs using LSTM or GRU units perform well on tasks requiring long-term dependencies, and the Conclusion (p. 7) reports their effectiveness in sequence modeling. The paper studies music and speech data, however; it does not establish that these networks capture the effect of historical measurements on current battery state of charge (SOC). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GRU offers a significant reduction in computational complexity compared to LSTM network, making it a more lightweight and efficient alternative.

    “Additionally, it offers a significant reduction in computational complexity when examined to the LSTM network, making it a more lightweight and efficient alternative.”

    From X-GEVON- a novel explainable intelligent network to detect the multiple attacks in vanet systems (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction (p. 1) reports that, on some datasets and with approximately equal parameter counts, GRU models converged faster than LSTM models in CPU time. The Results and Analysis (p. 6) likewise reports faster progress on the music datasets but says the overall GRU–LSTM comparison is inconclusive. These findings do not establish a significant reduction in computational complexity or that GRU is generally a more lightweight alternative. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recurrent neural networks, including long short-term memory and gated recurrent networks, are state-of-the-art approaches in sequence modeling and transduction problems such as language modeling and machine translation.

    “Recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory [13] and gated recurrent [7] neural networks in particular, have been firmly established as state of the art approaches in sequence modeling and transduction problems such as language modeling and machine translation [35, 2, 5].”

    From Attention Is All You Need (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

  • GRU is particularly effective in dealing with extended sequences and retaining long-term dependencies.

    “GRU is particularly effective in dealing with extended sequences and retaining long-term dependencies.”
  • The fourth layer of CPC is the Gated Recurrent Unit, which also learns representations similar to supervised learning.

    “The fourth layer of CPC is the Gated Recurrent Unit [8], which also learns representations similar to supervised learning.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Y. Bengio, P. Simard, and P. Frasconi. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks , 5(2):157-166, 1994.
  2. J. Bergstra, O. Breuleux, F. Bastien, P. Lamblin, R. Pascanu, G. Desjardins, J. Turian, D. WardeFarley, and Y. Bengio. Theano: a CPU and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy) , June 2010. Oral Presentation.
  3. S. Hochreiter. Untersuchungen zu dynamischen neuronalen Netzen. Diploma thesis, Institut f¨ ur Informatik, Lehrstuhl Prof. Brauer, Technische Universit¨ at M¨ unchen, 1991. URL http:// www7.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/˜Ehochreit .
  4. R. Pascanu, T. Mikolov, and Y. Bengio. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'13) . ACM, 2013. URL http://icml.cc/2013/ .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y.
Affiliations
Alcatel-Lucent (France) (FR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1924770834
Cited by
11,008
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 768 · 2024: 1415 · 2023: 1354 · 2022: 1193 · 2021: 1688 · 2020: 1596 · 2019: 1225 · 2018: 921 · 2017: 505 · 2016: 190 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
gated recurrent neural networks, gated recurrent unit, long short-term memory, sequence modeling, speech signal modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review