Cited by 0Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Interpretable refinement of medical foundation-model segmentation via visual thinking states and uncertainty gating

Kanber, Bassam M., Gou, Shuiping, Liu, Bo, Noaman, Naglaa F., Mukred, Magd, Al Smadi, Ahmad·2026·Neurocomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2026.134426

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Kanber, B. M., Gou, S., Liu, B., Noaman, N. F., Mukred, M., & Al Smadi, A.
Affiliations
  • Xidian University (CN)
  • North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov (RU)
Corresponding author
Gou, Shuiping
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-11
Volume
700
Pages
134426
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7167620883
Cited by
0
References
27
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (T2541002, 62372358)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
medical image segmentation, foundation models, segmentation refinement, uncertainty gating, residual refinement, interpretability, MedSAM, bounding box prompts, skin lesion segmentation, lung CT segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review