Cited by 2,620Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: A challenge at the 2017 International symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI), hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC)

Open access
Codella, Noel C. F., Gutman, David, Celebi, M. Emre, Helba, Brian, Marchetti, Michael A., Dusza, Stephen W., Kalloo, Aadi, Liopyris, Konstantinos +3 more·2018·2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018)

Abstract

This article describes the design, implementation, and results of the latest installment of the dermoscopic image analysis benchmark challenge. The goal is to support research and development of algorithms for automated diagnosis of melanoma, the most lethal skin cancer. The challenge was divided into 3 tasks: lesion segmentation, feature detection, and disease classification. Participation involved 593 registrations, 81 pre-submissions, 46 finalized submissions (including a 4-page manuscript), and approximately 50 attendees, making this the largest standardized and comparative study in this field to date. While the official challenge duration and ranking of participants has concluded, the dataset snapshots remain available for further research and development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isbi.2018.8363547

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural networks can leverage additional data by integrating multiple modalities into a general framework.

    “Previous works demonstrate the ability of neural networks to leverage additional data by integrating multiple modalities into a general framework.[11,27,28]”

    From Multimodal skin lesion classification using deep learning (2018) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Codella, N. C. F., Gutman, D., Celebi, M. E., Helba, B., Marchetti, M. A., Dusza, S. W., Kalloo, A., Liopyris, K., Mishra, N., Kittler, H., & Halpern, A.
Affiliations
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Central Arkansas (US)
  • Kitware (United States) (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-04
Pages
168-172
OpenAlex
W2346705140
Cited by
2,620
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 335 · 2025: 402 · 2024: 402 · 2023: 336 · 2022: 263 · 2021: 284 · 2020: 228 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 5
FWCI
448.07
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
melanoma detection, dermoscopic images, skin lesion segmentation, feature detection, skin cancer classification, benchmark challenge, automated diagnosis, ISIC dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review