REM sleep deprivation attenuates actin-binding protein cortactin: A link between sleep and hippocampal plasticity
Abstract
Rapid eye-movement sleep (REMS) is thought to affect synaptic plasticity. Cortactin is a cytoskeletal protein critically involved in the regulation of actin branching and stabilization including the actin backbone of dendritic spines. Hippocampal cortactin levels, phosphorylation, and processing appear to be altered during learning and long-term potentiation (LTP); consistent with a role for cortactin in the dendritic restructuring that accompanies synaptic plasticity. In this study juvenile male Sprague-Dawley rats were selectively REMS-deprived (RD) for 48 h by the flowerpot method. Cage control (CC) and large pedestal control (PC) animals were used for comparison. Animals were euthanized immediately, or 12 h, after removal from the pedestal. The hippocampus was dissected, flash-frozen, and stored for subsequent Western blot or quantitative RT-PCR analysis of cortactin. Cortactin mRNA/cDNA levels initially rose in PC and RD rats but returned to CC levels by 12 h after removal from the pedestal. Predictably cortactin protein levels were initially unchanged but were up-regulated after 12 h. The PC group had more total and tyrosine-phosphorylated cortactin protein expression than the RD and CC groups. This increase in cortactin was likely due to the exposure of the rats to the novel environment of the deprivation chambers thus triggering plasticity events. The lack of REMS, however, severely hampered cortactin protein up-regulation and phosphorylation observed in the PC group suggesting an attenuation of plasticity-related events. Thus, these data support a functional link between REMS and cytoskeletal reorganization in the hippocampus, a process that is essential for synaptic plasticity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selective deprivation of REM sleep appears to be sufficient for producing an impairment in LTP induction.
“Selective deprivation of REM sleep appears to be sufficient for producing an impairment in LTP induction (269,270,596,636,743,970,1010).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [270]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Davis, C. J., Meighan, P. C., Taishi, P., Krueger, J. M., Harding, J. W., & Wright, J. W.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davis, Christopher J.
- Venue
- Neuroscience Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 400
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-196
- ISSN
- 0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107167471
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Washington State University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-31453, R01NS031453)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- REM sleep deprivation, cortactin, hippocampus, synaptic plasticity, actin cytoskeleton, dendritic spines, cortactin phosphorylation, long-term potentiation, sleep and learning, cytoskeletal remodeling
- MeSH terms
- Actins, Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Protein Binding, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Sleep, REM, Statistics as Topic, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Cortactin, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review