Cited by 34Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderRedox biology and oxidative stressAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

Superoxide production after acute and chronic treatment with methylphenidate in young and adult rats

Open access
Gomes, Karin M., Inácio, Cecília G., Valvassori, Samira S., Réus, Gislaine Z., Boeck, Carina R., Dal-Pizzol, Felipe, Quevedo, João·2009·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

The prescription of methylphenidate (MPH) has dramatically increased in this decade for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment. The action mechanism of MPH is not completely understood and studies have been demonstrated that MPH can lead to neurochemical adaptations. Superoxide radical anion is not very reactive per se. However, severe species derived from superoxide radical anion mediate most of its toxicity. In this study, the superoxide level in submitochondrial particles was evaluated in response to treatment with MPH in the age-dependent manner in rats. MPH was administrated acutely or chronically at doses of 1, 2 or 10 mg/kg i.p. The results showed that the acute administration of MPH in all doses in young rats increased the production of superoxide in the cerebellum and only in the high dose (10mg/kg) in the hippocampus, while chronic treatment had no effect. However, acute treatment in adult rats had no effect on production of superoxide, but chronic treatment decreased the production of superoxide in the cerebellum at the lower doses. Our data suggest that the MPH treatment can influence on production of superoxide in some brain areas, but this effect depends on age of animals and treatment regime with MPH.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.060

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. D.F. Connor, Preschool attention deficit hyperactivity disorder a review of prevalence, diagnosis, neurobiology, and stimulant treatment, J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 23 (2002) S1-S9.
  2. B. Halliwell, M.C. Gutteridge, Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 3rd ed., Oxford, London, 1999.
  3. T.G. Hastings, D.A. Lewis, M.J. Zigmond, Role of oxidation in the neurotoxic effects of intrastrial dopamine injections, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (1996) 1956-1961.
  4. Y. Ikai, M. Takad, Y. Shinonaga, N. Mizuno, Dopaminergic and non- dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area of the rat project, respectively, to the cerebellar cortex and deep cerebellar nuclei, Neuroscience 51 (1992), 719-128.
  5. A.C. Issy, C. Salum, E.A. Del Bel, Nitric oxide modulation of methylphenidate- induced disruption of prepulse inhibition in Swiss mice. Behav. Brain Res., in press, doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.08.003. · DOI
  6. T.E. Robinson, J.B. Becker, Enduring changes in brain and behaviour produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis, Brain Res. 396 (1986) 157-198.
  7. C. Saunders, J.V. Ferrer, L. Shi, J. Chen, G. Merril, M.E. Lamb, L.M.F. Leeb- Lundberg, L. Carvelli, J.A. Javitch, A. Galli, Amphetamine-induced loss of human dopamine transporter activity: an internalization-dependent and cocaine- sensitive mechanism, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (2000) 6850-6855.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomes, K. M., Inácio, C. G., Valvassori, S. S., Réus, G. Z., Boeck, C. R., Dal-Pizzol, F., & Quevedo, J.
Affiliations
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (BR)
Corresponding author
Quevedo, João
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
465
Issue
1
Pages
95-98
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059135623
Cited by
34
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense
  • Instituto Mente e Cérebro - Neurociência
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
methylphenidate, superoxide production, oxidative stress, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, age-dependent effects, cerebellum, hippocampus, submitochondrial particles, neurotoxicity, young and adult rats
MeSH terms
Aging, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Brain, Cerebellum, Corpus Striatum, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Hippocampus, Male, Methylphenidate, Mitochondria, Superoxides, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review