Cited by 79Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAction Observation and Synchronization

Hemispheric dorsolateral prefrontal cortex lateralization in the regulation of empathy for pain

Open access
Rêgo, Gabriel G., Lapenta, Olívia M., Marques, Lucas M., Costa, Thiago L., Leite, Jorge, Carvalho, Sandra, Gonçalves, Óscar F., Brunoni, André R. +2 more·2015·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is involved in the cognitive appraisal and modulation of the pain experience. In this sham-controlled study, with healthy volunteers, we used bi-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the DLPFC to assess emotional reactions elicited by pain observation. Left-cathodal/right-anodal tDCS decreased valence and arousal evaluations compared to other tDCS conditions. Compared to sham condition, both left-cathodal/right-anodal and left-anodal/right-cathodal tDCS decreased hostility, sadness and self-pain perception. These decreased sensations after both active tDCS suggest a common role for left and right DLPFC in personal distress modulation. However, the differences in arousal and valence evaluations point to distinct roles of lateralized DLPFC in cognitive empathy, probably through distinct emotion regulation mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.03.042

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During a pain-related video observation task, both ANF3/CATF4 and ANF4/CATF3 tDCS effectively modulate valence/arousal evaluation and pupil dilatation response.

    “during a pain-related video observation task, both ANF3/CATF4 and ANF4/CATF3 tDCS effectively modulate valence/arousal evaluation and pupil dilatation response”

    From Ventrolateral but not Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex tDCS effectively impact emotion reappraisal – effects on Emotional Experience and Interbeat Interval (2018) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Procedures describe stimulation during pain-video observation, followed by valence and arousal ratings (section 2.2; page unavailable). The Results report significant valence and arousal differences for left-cathodal/right-anodal stimulation versus both sham and the opposite montage (section 3.1). Pupil dilation differed significantly between the two montages, but the left-cathodal/right-anodal comparison with sham was only a trend; the results do not show that both montages effectively modulated all three outcomes (section 3.2). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Each tDCS montage presents a particular effect resulting from the combination of the modulation of both electrodes.

    “each tDCS montage present a particular effect, resultant of the combination of the modulation of both electrodes”

    From Ventrolateral but not Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex tDCS effectively impact emotion reappraisal – effects on Emotional Experience and Interbeat Interval (2018) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Methods (§2.7; page unavailable) describe two montages that reverse the placement of anodal and cathodal electrodes, and the Results (§3.1; page unavailable) report different valence and arousal effects for those montages. This supports montage-dependent effects, but the study does not isolate each electrode’s contribution or establish that every montage’s effect results from their combined modulation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The right DLPFC has an effective role in the control of the emotional impact from negatively valent videos about pain.

    “These findings are consistent with another recent study by14, in which the authors showed an effective role of the right DLPFC in the control of the emotional impact from negatively valent videos about pain.”
  • Two contralateral PFC balanced tDCS montages (ANF3/CATF4 and ANF4/CATF3) can present two different effects even though they do not have opposite characteristics.

    “two contralateral PFC balanced tDCS montage (ANF3/CATF4 and ANF4/CATF3) could present two different effects even though they do not have opposite characteristics”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. K.N. Ochsner, J.A. Silvers, J.T. Buhle, Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: a synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1251 (2012).
  2. O. Seibt, A.R. Brunoni, Y. Huang, M. Bikson, The pursuit of DLPFC: non-neuronavigated methods to target the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex with symmetric bicephalic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Brain Stimulat. (2015), Available online, 16 Januarary 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.401 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rêgo, G. G., Lapenta, O. M., Marques, L. M., Costa, T. L., Leite, J., Carvalho, S., Gonçalves, Ó. F., Brunoni, A. R., Fregni, F., & Boggio, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Boggio, Paulo S.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
594
Pages
12-16
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965179975
Cited by
79
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2012/24696-1)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (2013‐0, 2012-5, 304164/2012-7)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, hemispheric lateralization, empathy for pain, cognitive empathy, emotional pain, transcranial direct current stimulation, pain observation, emotion regulation, valence and arousal, hostility, sadness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Arousal, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Pupil, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review