Cited by 31Schizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Evaluating the relationship between reelin gene variants (rs7341475 and rs262355) and schizophrenia: A meta-analysis

Li, Wei, Guo, Xingzhi, Xiao, Shifu·2015·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Studies have suggested that reelin (RELN) polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of schizophrenia (SZ), but the results remained controversial. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to determine whether RELN variants (rs7341475 and rs262355) were associated with SZ risk. Studies were identified through retrieving Web of Science, PubMed and Embase databases from inception to May 2015. The genotype data were extracted to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For rs7341475, five studies with 4741 SZ patients and 10075 controls are included and the results indicate that carriage of A allele is associated with decreased SZ risk in dominant genetic model (OR=0.90, 95%CI=0.83-0.98) and additive model (OR=0.90, 95% CI=0.84-0.97). Subgroup analysis indicates that the association between rs7341475 and SZ is only significant in Caucasian. For rs262355, four studies with 2017 SZ patients and 3274 controls are included, the results demonstrate that carriage of A allele is associated with increased risk of SZ only in Caucasian (dominant model: OR=1.17, 95%CI=1.01-1.37; additive model OR=1.13, 95%CI=1.02-1.27). This meta-analysis suggests that rs7341475 (A/G) and rs262355 (A/T) polymorphisms in RELN gene are inversely associated with SZ risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.10.014

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Axonal guidance and reelin signaling are important pathways for nervous system development and have been implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders such as bipolar, SCZ, and ADHD.

    “Axonal guidance and reelin signaling are important pathways for nervous system development and have been implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders such as bipolar, SCZ, and ADHD [64–68]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Guo, X., & Xiao, S.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Xiao, Shifu
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
609
Pages
42-47
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177553103
Cited by
31
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81201030)
  • China Science and Technology Ministry National Pillar Program (2009BAI77B03)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
reelin, RELN gene, schizophrenia, genetic polymorphism, genetic susceptibility, allele association, Caucasian population
MeSH terms
Reelin Protein, Humans, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Polymorphism, Genetic, Risk, Schizophrenia, Serine Endopeptidases, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review