Cited by 24Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Aging of the cingulum in the human brain: preliminary study of a diffusion tensor imaging study

Jang, Sung Ho, Kwon, Yong Hyun, Lee, Mi Young, Kim, Jae-Ryong, Seo, Jeong Pyo·2016·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

The cingulum, a major structure of the limbic system, is closely associated with memory function. In the current study, we investigated aging of the cingulum according to the location of the cingulum in each part of the cingulum after dividing the cingulum into five parts in normal subjects, using DTT parameters (fractional anisotropy (FA) and fiber number (FN)). Ninety healthy subjects (males: 44, females: 46, mean age: 49.0 years; range: 20-78 years) were enrolled in this study. Subjects were categorized according to six groups by age intervals of 10 years; each age group consisted of 15 subjects. The cingulum was divided into five parts (anterior, anterior superior, posterior superior cingulum, posterior, and inferior cingulum). The FA and FN of each part were measured. The FA value indicates the degree of directionality and integrity of white matter microstructures such as axons, myelin, and microtubules, and the FN reflects the total number of fibers in a neural tract. Age-related decline in the FA value may indicate demyelination, and a decline in the number of myelinated fibers of a neural tract can also lead to a decline of the FN. Significant differences in the FA value of the anterior cingulum and anterior superior cingulum, and the FN of the inferior cingulum were observed between age groups (AVOVA, p<0.05). A significant decrease was observed in the FA values of the anterior and anterior superior cingulum of the 60s and 70s age groups compared with those of the 20…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.11.018

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jang et al. (2016) reported decreased FA in anterior and anterior superior portions of the cingulum in older versus younger adults.

    “They reported decreased FA in anterior and anterior superior portions of the cingulum in older versus younger adults.”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Jang et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jang, S. H., Kwon, Y. H., Lee, M. Y., Kim, J.-R., & Seo, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Yeungnam University College (KR)
  • Daegu Haany University (KR)
Corresponding author
Seo, Jeong Pyo
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
610
Pages
213-217
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178717736
Cited by
24
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Center Program (2015R1A5A2009124)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
cingulum, brain aging, fractional anisotropy, fiber number, white matter integrity, demyelination, anterior cingulum, limbic system
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review