Cited by 48Estrogen and related hormone effectsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Effects of treatment with estrogen and progesterone on the methamphetamine-induced cognitive impairment in ovariectomized rats

Ghazvini, Hamed, Khaksari, Mohammad, Esmaeilpour, Khadijeh, Shabani, Mohammad, Asadi-Shekaari, Majid, Khodamoradi, Mehdi, Sheibani, Vahid·2016·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Methamphetamine (METH) is one of the most powerful psychostimulant that leads to long lasting cognitive impairment. Earlier researches demonstrated that ovarian hormones including estrogen and progesterone ameliorate cognitive function against various central nervous system disorders. Moreover, recent studies demonstrate a neuroprotective role against methamphetamine toxicity. In current study the effects of estrogen and progesterone alone or in combination, on spatial learning and memory in METH-exposed ovariectomized (OVX) rats are investigated. Three weeks after ovariectomy, the animals were treated by estrogen (1mg/kg, i.p.) and progesterone (8mg/kg, i.p.) alone and in combination or vehicle during 14 consecutive days. On the 28th day, rats were exposed to a single-day METH regimens (four injections of 6mg/kg, s.c, at 2h intervals) 30min after the hormones treatment. Finally, spatial learning and memory were examined using the Morris water maze 2days after the last treatment. The findings showed that estrogen and progesterone did not have significant effect on spatial learning and memory in non METH-exposed OVX rats. The treatment with estrogen and progesterone alone in METH-exposed rats, significantly improved spatial learning and memory impairment. On the other hand, the cognitive performance of animals that received combination of estrogen plus progesterone in METH-exposed rats did not significantly differ from that of METH-exposed animals that received vehicle injections. Taken together, the present findings suggest that treatment with ovarian hormones can partially improve spatial learning and memory deficits induced by methamphetamine in OVX rats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.057

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ghazvini, H., Khaksari, M., Esmaeilpour, K., Shabani, M., Asadi-Shekaari, M., Khodamoradi, M., & Sheibani, V.
Affiliations
Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Sheibani, Vahid
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
619
Pages
60-67
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2290108961
Cited by
48
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kerman Neuroscience Research Center (KNRC/EC/92-65)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
methamphetamine, cognitive impairment, estrogen, progesterone, ovariectomy, spatial learning and memory, ovarian hormones, neuroprotection, psychostimulants, hormone combinations
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Cognition Disorders, Estradiol, Estrogens, Female, Memory, Short-Term, Methamphetamine, Ovariectomy, Progesterone, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Spatial Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review