Cited by 774Machine Learning and AlgorithmsMachine Learning and Data ClassificationMachine Learning and ELM

A new learning paradigm: Learning using privileged information

Vapnik, Vladimir, Vashist, Akshay·2009·Neural Networks

Abstract

In the Afterword to the second edition of the book "Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data" by V. Vapnik, an advanced learning paradigm called Learning Using Hidden Information (LUHI) was introduced. This Afterword also suggested an extension of the SVM method (the so called SVM(gamma)+ method) to implement algorithms which address the LUHI paradigm (Vapnik, 1982-2006, Sections 2.4.2 and 2.5.3 of the Afterword). See also (Vapnik, Vashist, & Pavlovitch, 2008, 2009) for further development of the algorithms. In contrast to the existing machine learning paradigm where a teacher does not play an important role, the advanced learning paradigm considers some elements of human teaching. In the new paradigm along with examples, a teacher can provide students with hidden information that exists in explanations, comments, comparisons, and so on. This paper discusses details of the new paradigm and corresponding algorithms, introduces some new algorithms, considers several specific forms of privileged information, demonstrates superiority of the new learning paradigm over the classical learning paradigm when solving practical problems, and discusses general questions related to the new ideas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.042

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Typical multi-modal models suffer in missing modality scenarios.

    “As the typical multi-modal models suffer in such scenarios, there was a large body of studies to address the missing modality problem (Vapnik and Vashist 2009; Pechyony and Vapnik 2010; Vapnik, Izmailov et al. 2015; Lopez-Paz et al. 2015; Ma et al. 2022; Zhao, Li, and Jin 2021; Alayrac et al. 2020; Ma et al. 2021)”

    From Towards Good Practices for Missing Modality Robust Action Recognition (2023) · cites this paper as Vapnik and Vashist 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vapnik, V., & Vashist, A.
Corresponding author
Vapnik, Vladimir
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
22
Issue
5-6
Pages
544-557
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067562626
Cited by
774
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
Keywords
privileged information, support vector machine, learning paradigms
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Bayes Theorem, Forecasting, Language, Learning, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Time Factors, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Databases, Genetic, Information Dissemination, Mathematical Concepts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review