Cited by 207Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Learning with Side Information through Modality Hallucination

Hoffman, Judy, Gupta, Saurabh, Darrell, Trevor·2016·2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

We present a modality hallucination architecture for training an RGB object detection model which incorporates depth side information at training time. Our convolutional hallucination network learns a new and complementary RGB image representation which is taught to mimic convolutional mid-level features from a depth network. At test time images are processed jointly through the RGB and hallucination networks to produce improved detection performance. Thus, our method transfers information commonly extracted from depth training data to a network which can extract that information from the RGB counterpart. We present results on the standard NYUDv2 dataset and report improvement on the RGB detection task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2016.96

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In action recognition, prior missing modality studies follow transfer learning via knowledge distillation.

    “In the context of action recognition (Tran et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2016; Carreira and Zisserman 2017; Feichtenhofer et al. 2019), there are handful of studies towards this end (Hoffman, Gupta, and Darrell 2016; Luo et al. 2018; Garcia, Morerio, and Murino 2018, 2019; Garcia et al. 2019; Stroud et al. 2020), all of which follow transfer learning scheme via knowledge distillation (Hinton et al. 201”

    From Towards Good Practices for Missing Modality Robust Action Recognition (2023) · cites this paper as Hoffman, Gupta, and Darrell 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, J., Gupta, S., & Darrell, T.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-06
Pages
826-834
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2463402750
Cited by
207
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
side information, mid-level features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review