Cited by 53Neural Networks and ApplicationsTheoretical and Computational PhysicsNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new mechanical approach to handle generalized Hopfield neural networks

Open access
Barra, Adriano, Beccaria, Matteo, Fachechi, Alberto·2018·Neural Networks

Abstract

We propose a modification of the cost function of the Hopfield model whose salient features shine in its Taylor expansion and result in more than pairwise interactions with alternate signs, suggesting a unified framework for handling both with deep learning and network pruning. In our analysis, we heavily rely on the Hamilton-Jacobi correspondence relating the statistical model with a mechanical system. In this picture, our model is nothing but the relativistic extension of the original Hopfield model (whose cost function is a quadratic form in the Mattis magnetization and mimics the non-relativistic counterpart, the so-called classical limit). We focus on the low-storage regime and solve the model analytically by taking advantage of the mechanical analogy, thus obtaining a complete characterization of the free energy and the associated self-consistency equations in the thermodynamic limit. Further, on the numerical side, we test the performances of our proposal with extensive Monte Carlo simulations, showing that the stability of spurious states (limiting the capabilities of the standard Hebbian construction) is sensibly reduced due to presence of unlearning contributions that prune them massively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.010

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Agliari, 2012, Multitasking associative networks, Physical Review Letters, 109, 268101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.268101 · DOI
  2. Agliari, 2013, Multitasking attractor networks with neuronal threshold noises, Neural Networks, 49, 19, 10.1016/j.neunet.2013.09.008 · DOI
  3. Agliari, 2013, Parallel retrieval of correlated patterns: From Hopfield networks to Boltzmann machines, Neural Networks, 38, 52, 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.11.010 · DOI
  4. Agliari, 2017, Neural Networks retrieving binary patterns in a sea of real ones, Journal of Statistical Physics, 168, 1085, 10.1007/s10955-017-1840-9 · DOI
  5. Arsie, 2015, Integrable viscous conservation laws, Nonlinearity, 28, 1859, 10.1088/0951-7715/28/6/1859 · DOI
  6. Arsie, 2015, On integrable conservation laws, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A (Mathematical and Physical Sciences), 471, 20140124
  7. Aserinsky, 1953, Regularly occurring periods of eye motility, and concomitant phenomena, during sleep, Science, 118, 273, 10.1126/science.118.3062.273 · DOI
  8. Barra, 2008, The mean field ising model trough interpolating techniques, Journal of Statistical Physics, 132, 787, 10.1007/s10955-008-9567-2 · DOI
  9. Barra, 2010, Replica symmetry breaking in mean field spin glasses trough Hamilton–Jacobi technique, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, P09006
  10. Barra, 2011, Equilibrium statistical mechanics of bipartite spin systems, Journal of Physics A, 44, 245002, 10.1088/1751-8113/44/24/245002 · DOI
  11. Barra, 2017, Phase transitions of restricted Boltzmann machines with generic priors, Physical Review E, 96, 042156, 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.042156 · DOI
  12. Barra, 2018, Phase diagram of restricted Boltzmann machines & generalized Hopfield models, Physical Review E, 97, 022310, 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.022310 · DOI
  13. Barra, 2012, On the equivalence among Hopfield neural networks and restricted Boltzman machines, Neural Networks, 34, 1, 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.06.003 · DOI
  14. Barra, 2014, On quantum and relativistic mechanical analogues in mean field spin models, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 470, 20140589
  15. Bovier, 1997, The retrieval phase of the Hopfield model: a rigorous analysis of the overlap distribution, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 107, 61, 10.1007/s004400050077 · DOI
  16. Bovier, 1994, Gibbs states of the Hopfield model in the regime of perfect memory, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 100, 329, 10.1007/BF01193704 · DOI
  17. Bovier, 1995, Gibbs states of the Hopfield model with extensively many patterns, Journal of Statistical Physics, 79, 395, 10.1007/BF02179395 · DOI
  18. Choromanska, 2015, The loss surfaces of multilayer networks, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics
  19. Decelle, A. Fissore, G., Furtlehner, C. (2017). Spectral learning of restricted Boltzmann machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.02917. · DOI
  20. Dotsenko, 1991, Statistical mechanics of Hopfield-like neural networks with modified interactions, Journal of Physics A, 24, 2419, 10.1088/0305-4470/24/10/026 · DOI
  21. Gardner, 1998, The space of interactions in neural network models, Journal of Physics A, 21, 257, 10.1088/0305-4470/21/1/030 · DOI
  22. Genovese, 2009, A mechanical approach to mean field spin models, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 50, 10.1063/1.3131687 · DOI
  23. Guerra, 2001, Sum rules for the free energy in the mean field spin glass model, Fields Institute Communications, 30, 161
  24. Guerra, 2012, How glassy are neural networks?, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, P07009
  25. Guerra, 2014, Mean Field bipartite spin models treated with mechanical techniques, European Physical Journal B, 87, 74, 10.1140/epjb/e2014-40952-4 · DOI
  26. Hassibi, B., Stork, D.G., Wolff, G. (1993). Optimal brain surgeon and general network pruning. In ICNN proc., Vol. 93 (pp. 293–299). IEEE Press. · DOI
  27. Hopfield, 1983, Unlearning has a stabilizing effect in collective memories, Nature Letters, 304, 280158, 10.1038/304158a0 · DOI
  28. Hopfield, 1985, Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems, Biological Cybernetics, 52, 141, 10.1007/BF00339943 · DOI
  29. Huang, 2010, Reconstructing the Hopfield network as an inverse Ising problem, Physical Review E, 81, 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.036104 · DOI
  30. Huang, 2005, A generalized growing and pruning RBF neural network for function approximation, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 16, 1045
  31. Huang, 2015, Advanced mean-field theory of the restricted Boltzmann machine, Physical Review E, 91, 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.050101 · DOI
  32. Kappen, 1998, Efficient learning in Boltzmann machines using linear response theory, Neural Computation, 10, 1137, 10.1162/089976698300017386 · DOI
  33. Kirk, 2007, NVIDIA CUDA software and GPU parallel computing architecture, Institute of Supply and Materials Management, 7, 103
  34. Kirkpatrick, 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 220, 671, 10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kleinfeld, 1987, Unlearning increases the storage capacity of content addressable memories, Biophysical Journal, 51, 47, 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83310-6 · DOI
  36. Le Roux, 2008, Representational power of restricted Boltzmann machines and deep belief networks, Neural Computation, 20, 1631, 10.1162/neco.2008.04-07-510 · DOI
  37. Mezard, 2017, Mean-field message-passing equations in the Hopfield model and its generalizations, Physical Review E, 95, 022117, 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.022117 · DOI
  38. Nickolls, 2008, Scalable parallel programming with CUDA, Queue, 6, 40, 10.1145/1365490.1365500 · DOI
  39. Nokura, 1996, Paramagnetic unlearning in neural network models, Physical Review E, 54, 5571, 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.5571 · DOI
  40. Nokura, 1998, Spin glass states of the anti-Hopfield model, Journal of Physics A, 31, 7447, 10.1088/0305-4470/31/37/007 · DOI
  41. Pastur, 1994, The replica-symmetric solution without replica trick for the Hopfield model, Journal of Statistical Physics, 74, 1161, 10.1007/BF02188221 · DOI
  42. Salakhutdinov, 2009, Deep Boltzmann machines, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics
  43. Schmidhuber, 2015, Deep learning in neural networks: An overview, Neural Networks, 61, 85, 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Stickgold, 2001, Sleep, learning and dreams: Off-line memory reprocessing, Science, 294, 1052, 10.1126/science.1063530 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Talagrand, 1998, Rigor ous results for the Hopfield model with many patterns, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 110, 177, 10.1007/s004400050148 · DOI
  46. Talagrand, 2000, Exponential inequalities and convergence of moments in the replica-symmetric regime of the Hopfield model, The Annals of Probability, 1393
  47. Tramel, 2016, Approximate message passing with restricted Boltzmann machine priors, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10.1088/1742-5468/2016/07/073401 · DOI
  48. Tubiana, 2017, Emergence of compositional representations in restricted Boltzmann machines, Physical Review Letters, 118, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.138301 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barra, A., Beccaria, M., & Fachechi, A.
Affiliations
University of Salento (IT)
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
106
Pages
205-222
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883260865
Cited by
53
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • AIRUS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • GNFM-INdAM (AGLIARI2018)
  • MIUR
  • Rete Match: Progetto Pythagoras (CUP:J48C17000250006))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
Hopfield neural network, cost function modification, mechanical analogy, free energy, self-consistent equations, thermodynamic limit, network pruning, unlearning, spurious states, Hebbian learning, deep learning, pairwise interactions
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Monte Carlo Method, Thermodynamics, Models, Statistical, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review