Cited by 123EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Learning joint space–time–frequency features for EEG decoding on small labeled data.

Zhao, Dongye, Tang, Fengzhen, Si, Bailu, Feng, Xisheng·2019·Neural Networks

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which control external equipment using cerebral activity, have received considerable attention recently. Translating brain activities measured by electroencephalography (EEG) into correct control commands is a critical problem in this field. Most existing EEG decoding methods separate feature extraction from classification and thus are not robust across different BCI users. In this paper, we propose to learn subject-specific features jointly with the classification rule. We develop a deep convolutional network (ConvNet) to decode EEG signals end-to-end by stacking time-frequency transformation, spatial filtering, and classification together. Our proposed ConvNet implements a joint space-time-frequency feature extraction scheme for EEG decoding. Morlet wavelet-like kernels used in our network significantly reduce the number of parameters compared with classical convolutional kernels and endow the features learned at the corresponding layer with a clear interpretation, i.e. spectral amplitude. We further utilize subject-to-subject weight transfer, which uses parameters of the networks trained for existing subjects to initialize the network for a new subject, to solve the dilemma between a large number of demanded data for training deep ConvNets and small labeled data collected in BCIs. The proposed approach is evaluated on three public data sets, obtaining superior classification performance compared with the state-of-the-art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.02.009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, D., Tang, F., Si, B., & Feng, X.
Affiliations
Shenyang Institute of Automation (CN)
Corresponding author
Tang, Fengzhen
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
114
Pages
67-77
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921618710
Cited by
123
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SIA OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0801808)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDY-SSW-JSC005)
  • CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program, China (Y8F1160101)
  • State Key Laboratory of Robotics, China (Y7C120E101])
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
EEG decoding, brain-computer interface, small labeled datasets, spatial filtering, time-frequency transforms
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Electroencephalography, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review