Learning joint space–time–frequency features for EEG decoding on small labeled data.
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which control external equipment using cerebral activity, have received considerable attention recently. Translating brain activities measured by electroencephalography (EEG) into correct control commands is a critical problem in this field. Most existing EEG decoding methods separate feature extraction from classification and thus are not robust across different BCI users. In this paper, we propose to learn subject-specific features jointly with the classification rule. We develop a deep convolutional network (ConvNet) to decode EEG signals end-to-end by stacking time-frequency transformation, spatial filtering, and classification together. Our proposed ConvNet implements a joint space-time-frequency feature extraction scheme for EEG decoding. Morlet wavelet-like kernels used in our network significantly reduce the number of parameters compared with classical convolutional kernels and endow the features learned at the corresponding layer with a clear interpretation, i.e. spectral amplitude. We further utilize subject-to-subject weight transfer, which uses parameters of the networks trained for existing subjects to initialize the network for a new subject, to solve the dilemma between a large number of demanded data for training deep ConvNets and small labeled data collected in BCIs. The proposed approach is evaluated on three public data sets, obtaining superior classification performance compared with the state-of-the-art methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The result that a lightweight architecture was beneficial is in line with the recent growth of interest in the design of optimized layers in CNNs for EEG decoding.
“This result is in line with the recent growth of interest in the design of optimized layers in CNNs for EEG decoding as proposed by Zhao et al. (2019) and Borra et al. (2020b).”
From BCIAUT-P300: A Multi-Session and Multi-Subject Benchmark Dataset on Autism for P300-Based Brain-Computer-Interfaces (2020) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2019
Cites
Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization
Schirrmeister, R. T., Springenberg, J. T., Fiederer, L. D. J., Glasstetter, M., Eggensperger, K., Tangermann, M., Hutter, F., Burgard, W., & Ball, T. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23730 · Cited by 3,751 · see citing works
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143 · see citing works
Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis
Blankertz, B., Tomioka, R., Lemm, S., Kawanabe, M., & Muller, K.-R. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.4408441 · Cited by 2,080 · see citing works
Single-trial EEG RSVP classification using convolutional neural networks
Shamwell, J., Lee, H., Kwon, H., Marathe, A. R., Lawhern, V., & Nothwang, W. (2016) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.2224172 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Simões, M., Borra, D., Santamaría-Vázquez, E., GBT-UPM, Bittencourt-Villalpando, M., Krzemiński, D., Miladinović, A., Neural_Engineering_Group, Schmid, T., Zhao, H., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.568104 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Borra, D., Fantozzi, S., & Magosso, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.655840 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhao, D., Tang, F., Si, B., & Feng, X.
- Affiliations
- Shenyang Institute of Automation (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tang, Fengzhen
- Venue
- Neural Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 67-77
- ISSN
- 0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921618710
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SIA OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0801808)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDY-SSW-JSC005)
- CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program, China (Y8F1160101)
- State Key Laboratory of Robotics, China (Y7C120E101])
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Keywords
- EEG decoding, brain-computer interface, small labeled datasets, spatial filtering, time-frequency transforms
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Electroencephalography, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Brain-Computer Interfaces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review