Cited by 578Time Series Analysis and ForecastingHydrological Forecasting Using AIStock Market Forecasting Methods

Transductive LSTM for time-series prediction: An application to weather forecasting

Open access
Karevan, Zahra, Suykens, Johan A.K.·2020·Neural Networks

Abstract

Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) has shown significant performance on many real-world applications due to its ability to capture long-term dependencies. In this paper, we utilize LSTM to obtain a data-driven forecasting model for an application of weather forecasting. Moreover, we propose Transductive LSTM (T-LSTM) which exploits the local information in time-series prediction. In transductive learning, the samples in the test point vicinity are considered to have higher impact on fitting the model. In this study, a quadratic cost function is considered for the regression problem. Localizing the objective function is done by considering a weighted quadratic cost function at which point the samples in the neighborhood of the test point have larger weights. We investigate two weighting schemes based on the cosine similarity between the training samples and the test point. In order to assess the performance of the proposed method in different weather conditions, the experiments are conducted on two different time periods of a year. The results show that T-LSTM results in better performance in the prediction task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.12.030

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karevan, Z., & Suykens, J. A. K.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Karevan, Zahra
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
125
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000500483
Cited by
578
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 14
FWCI
33.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.088114N)
  • Vlaamse regering
  • European Resuscitation Council
  • European Research Council (787960)
  • KU Leuven
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Keywords
time series forecasting, weather forecasting, transductive learning, local information, long short-term memory, data-driven prediction
MeSH terms
Weather, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review